which law is it against?

there are important differences between laws and rules or policies. are you sure there's really a law that says a voting machine can't be connected to any network? which one?

when saying they are not to be connected to networks, that could just be describing best practice.

were they not destroyed?

nope. youre off topic. Fitton's statement is about rep/sen pairs objecting to electors (objections only happen when there is 1 set, not 2). There's no need to object when there's competing electors because shit already has to happen when there's 2 sets.

your scenario is something different than the one Fitton described.

they have the aluminum bottles where's he's at. lucky. wish we had those here.

yea, but the "they" in your first sentence is the house democrats, not republicans.

isn't this some real underpants gnome shit?

what's the step AFTER republicans back the objection?

because that step alone will not result in trump being declared winner. there has to be something else in between.

why is this key?

house dems aren't going to be persuaded to vote against biden electors no matter what state the objections come from.

won’t make any wild

trump said will be wild

if you expect a mod to do something, you need to name names. they have no idea who you are talking about otherwise.

interview voice is lin woods voice not john roberts.

if there is a tape of roberts, it hasn't been released. this post is only what lin woods has said about a tape that he claims exists but he won't let anybody hear.

so, even if you have software, there's nothing for you to check. if you want to be optimistic, there's nothing "yet" for you to check.

people are talking about it.

but the reason it isn't getting more traction is because wood is only describing the tapes, he isn't releasing them for anybody else to hear.

most people have been shown voter fraud by him 0 times.

if media doesn't cover it, many people don't see any of it.

"official"? what's the source here?

it doesn't really change the point that much, but i'd like to see this number out to 1 or 2 decimal places because the title probably isn't exactly true. it's probably not 9385-0, probably something like 9385-38, which with percentages rounded to nearest integer rounds to 100-0.

But if it actually is 9385 - 0 , that is super amazing.

9385-38 is still pretty crazy. but 0% rounded down is not quite as striking as literally 0 votes would be.

If this is the 'after' screenshot, seems like there should be a 'before' screenshot? Otherwise how do we know whether twitter changed this vs typed in wrong?

Is this part of a tweet chain with the other image in another tweet?

not sure why pelosi cares. house dems would just vote down any objections after 2 hours and move on to the next one and vote that one down 2 hours later rinse and repeat until its over.

i understand why mcconnell cares. he wants to vote down objections too but realizes that would massively fuckup future gop fundraising.

today I learned that reading comprehension is so bad that Americans believe "voters" and "people voting" are identical terms

those are identical terms.

did you mean "votes"? cuz Trump said "votes", not "voters". or are you being the bad reading comprehension american that you are learning about?

that's not how normies consume news. Normies are people who watch the news or cable news or their newspaper or hear about it from somebody else who watched one of those things.

If it's not covered by mainstream media, it's not reaching the normies.

so they apologize for confusion about their position...

but refuse to comment on their position to clarify and end the confusion?

all the faith he is demonstrating here is that he has faith that they are spying on americans.

yes, a vote in both house and senate. if both house and senate agree that the objection has merit, then the original votes are overruled and replaced with what the objector says it should be.

If house and senate both agree that the objection is in error, and the votes presented were lawful, then the original electoral votes stand.

If split, house and senate disagree ... original electoral votes stand.

Both house and senate have to agree for there to be a change.

If you'd like to read this process yourself, search for "3 usc 15" and do a ctrl f for "objection" and you can read the exact text. It's not long, the whole thing is a few paragraphs, and this specific part about objections is just a few sentences. But you'll see that this is also where the "2 hour" limit comes from.

so op, you think getting the vaccine sooner is a good and desirable thing?

one might think that giving the vaccine to others and not me would make him a bro looking out for me, not that he hates me.

mabye you're right though. In that case, I hope he hates me so much that I get pushed so far back in line that they run out and don't make any more and I'll never get one.

can you link to 3 of them please so I can see them too?

it's per state. They don't read the votes of each elector individually, they read the votes of each state, like "Wyoming gives 3 votes to Trump" or "Wyoming gives 2 votes to Trump and 1 vote to Biden" and then a rep/sen pair can object to the state's tally.

People mistakenly think the objection is per elector because the times it's been used in recent past has been due to a faithless elector. But the objection is to the state's tally, not the individual elector.

why was she arguing saying that the mall isn't private property? that's one point where the security guard is almost certainly correct - that the mall is private property.