1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +4 / -3

Germans fought against evil overlords as well as the French did 100+ years before, and they had the same dismal outcome.

Edit. Lest I'm misundersood: natsoc was itself doomed, a house built on sand.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Video was dumb. Just another rebranding of CRT where whites are the victims and anyone who isn't actively pro-white is anti-white.

I've heard decent arguments for both ethno nationalism and the evil ZOG conspiracy, but that was just retarded.

2
RootinTootin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good video... Really? I'm late to this thread but that video was the same lame gatekeeping and purity tests that ethno-statists always revert to.

Peterson isn't pretending to fight CRT and cultural marxism because he secretly hates white people, he's just opposed to all forms of racial identitariansm including white nationalism. You can call him an idiot for still trying to be a classical liberal in 2023, but that's about it.

3
RootinTootin 3 points ago +3 / -0

News flash, they don't need trump or a republican in office to get rich, a dem will work just fine too

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess there's never been a period in US history where we've existed without income tax, the federal reserve, socialized welfare, AND police departments. Nope, never happened. Private citizens and communities can't take care of themselves.

11
RootinTootin 11 points ago +11 / -0

No that's too long. I need each session condensed to a 30 sec video with just a dancing girl and an audio voice over.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +2 / -1

What would you need in addition to the 2nd ammendment, and the due processes protected in other amendments, to prevent crimes? Is not rising crime directly related to the infringement of our basic human rights?

Why do you think you need police to actually prevent crimes, as opposed to just finding criminals after the fact.

2
RootinTootin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whatever. I used to genuinely think like you apparently claim to, but as time went by I never saw one aggressively violent person arrested. There's been some close ones like these dudes that went after a reporter, but then you watch the actual video and it's not that bad.

I'm sorry but I don't give credence anymore to plea deals, especially when someones been locked up over a year without trial, nor convictions by a DC jury. I need to see the evidence for myself, which so far has been extremely underwhelming.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the love of God this isn't hard. Just show me good evidence, not heresay, of someone from our side who was genuinely violent and is now locked up. FYI Law 101: the prosecutions allegations are not evidence.

4
RootinTootin 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's pleading not guiltily to all charges. Im sure the DC jury will believe it all, but I now give zero credence to what the DOJ claims, or what capital police testimony is. Again, I'd like to see where he was on ANY video doing these violent things.

3
RootinTootin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who? Who has been charged? I saw that video and there is maybe 1 or 2 people that actually look like they deliberately attacked. Have they been charged? Everyone else is just being pushed around in the crowd and getting pepper sprayed.

3
RootinTootin 3 points ago +3 / -0

He had a cane with a built in stun gun.

Doesn't matter though, even without out it I'm sure they would have said the cane was a deadly weapon, and the DC jury would have agreed.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure it was much better this time in 2022. Ignoring a problem always makes it go away.

-1
RootinTootin -1 points ago +4 / -5

Scared.

Rumor was McConnell and rinos said they would get the 2/3 votes to convict him with impeachment if he didn't sftu and gtfo

Whoever gets in next, even if Trump again, needs to be willing to be JFKed if any serious change is to be done at the federal level.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

We already weren't on it behind the scenes, least that's my understanding. Nixon more just made it official when we were called out on it

2
RootinTootin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never meant you specifically fren. That was meant as a generic "you"

view more: Next ›