2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Zero likes: Yep. It appears that even the lefties in Canada don't like him.

Nevertheless, and unfortunately, it looks like he is a politically-connected cockroach, working in the shadows:

https://www.thelittleeducationreport.ca/page2

As to my username, it's a reference to the historical Rosetta Stone:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone

Years ago, there were a couple of old languages in the Middle East that archeologists couldn't translate, from the writing samples they had.

Then they found the Rosetta Stone, which contained a political announcement, where the same message was written in multiple languages. That provided the key to start translating the previously undecipherable languages.

I didn't know about Tool, but the name makes sense for a translation engine.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was curious, so I found his twit feed:

https://twitter.com/jdouglaslittle

Then I wondered how he could post so frequently, and also do his job as a University Professor, so I looked further.

Over the past 24 hours, not counting retweets, he posted at times:

1h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 7h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 12h, 12h, 13h, 13h, 13h, 13h, 13h, 13h, 13h, 15h, 17h 20h, 23h

When did he sleep?

Now I'm thinking his feed is being used by an organization that has a reason to wants us all to take the Vax, say Pfizer or the CCP.

And the professor is probably getting blood money.

4
RosettaStone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good often underestimates Evil, because Good assumes that others have principles, and Evil does not.

On the other hand...

Evil often underestimates Good, because Evil assumes that others do not have principles, and Good does.

5
RosettaStone 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's crazy to think, he was a Bernie bro...

There are many idealistic people who see the same problems we do, but have been taught the wrong solutions. That's a positive foundation, and it's sometimes possible to get those people to see the truth, given time.

Ayn Rand once said that it might be easier to teach Liberty to students from a Russian school, who had been taught hard-core Communism, because at least they had learned to think in terms of principles. American students, on the other hand, were being taught that there are no principles on which to base their knowledge (Rand recognized Critical Theory before it was even a thing).

5
RosettaStone 5 points ago +5 / -0

BuT DiEt HaS nO EfFeCt On AcNe!

I got rid of my chronic brochitus/asthma with diet changes. I've never had a recurrence, and I barely even get colds now.

Doctors never wanted to look for a cause, or even talk about it. They only wanted to put me on drugs for the rest of my life.

3
RosettaStone 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only explanation is that the vaccines compromise your natural antibodies.

You are correct. Some based researchers have shown that to be the case.

10
RosettaStone 10 points ago +10 / -0

Plus, you won't be doing your part to create nice new variants.

1
RosettaStone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plus, if the suit is brought by multiple employees, with multiple injuries, then the claim is even stronger.

9
RosettaStone 9 points ago +9 / -0

Right. And we all know that the government would never inflate the numbers to make themselves look good.

8
RosettaStone 8 points ago +8 / -0

She also gets the special "Hillary Clinton" treatment with Futures trading.

Pelosi, and the company bribing her, both buy the same futures, through the same brokerage firm. The brokerage firm buys both sides of the bet, up and down.

Then, when the time is right, and the Futures have made a major shift in price, the brokerage firm shuffles the assignments, giving the winning Futures to Pelosi, and the losing Futures to the company paying the bribe.

Thus, the bribe gets paid in a way that looks legal.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. Random non sequiturs are a standard feature of Patriots.win.

Welcome aboard, and much respect.

4
RosettaStone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rape Ape, Rape Ape.

(You have to be old enough in order to get that one.)

6
RosettaStone 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't give up. It's only permanent until the California Democrats get voted out. Oh, wait...

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the insurance company will not pay out, because you chose to undergo an experimental procedure.

12
RosettaStone 12 points ago +13 / -1

Some of us have loved ones who ignored our advice and got vaxxed, not because they're evil, but because they were afraid, and they were taught, all their lives, to listen to authority.

We don't want to lose loved ones just because they were foolish.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. So there is. Is his password password?

3
RosettaStone 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget the Media's other roles in the fraud, which occur before the election:

  1. Controlling which candidates get seen and heard by the voters.

  2. Disparaging candidates who are popular enough to challenge the cabal's chosen candidate.

  3. Fake Polls, designed to make the fraudulent result seem plausible.

5
RosettaStone 5 points ago +5 / -0

People in the media can get into legal trouble for things like defamation (e.g. saying someone is guilty of something when it has not been proven).

But that usually results in a civil lawsuit, rather than criminal charges.

I agree with the OP that willfully helping to cover up a stolen election is a criminal act, possibly rising to the level of sedition.

I look forward to the day when enemies of the country, like Stahl, pay the price for their crimes.

There are so many others that need to be on the list. A random sample that comes to my mind includes Anderson Cooper, Barbara Walters, Judy Woodruff, Christiane Amanpour, Don Lemon, Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyers, Trevor Noah, Chris Cuomo, Lester Holt, Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, Jake Tapper, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

I'd throw in the ladies of The View, but they'd probably get off by claiming that their IQ was too low to understand what they were doing.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

True. Gorka, Charlie Kirk, and some others, appear to be part of a group that is partly on our side (they don't want America to be a Communist dictatorship), but they are also not totally on the side of freedom.

I think they are hoping that, when the smoke clears, they will be the ones in charge... you know,,, for the good of the country. :-/

1
RosettaStone 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how the left has always won, they're willing to go all in and we're trying to be civilized.

They won so easily because the good people had been conned (by the media and corrupt leaders), and didn't understand the true nature of the fight.

We're awake now. It's going to be a lot harder to stop us this time.

view more: Next ›