3
RussianBot6969 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't want to talk about how many hundreds of thousands showed up to protest or about the lack of a counter-protest from the supposed highest-vote-getter-in-American history.

We all know why

3
RussianBot6969 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's remarkable is that, with a crowd that size of pissed-off supporters of the President, the violence was limited to exactly one location and was promptly quelled. There wasn't citywide violence or looting; there weren't nightly riots for 100 days; there weren't smashed storefronts, ruined businesses, or widespread assaults on police officers.

Hundreds of thousands of people showed up to peacefully protest the fraud. A few hooligans acted out and others caved to the hysteria that is mob-mentality. It was targeted at a very specific group.

2
RussianBot6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd suggest Republicans boycott the process, but if even one breaks rank and attends, the Senate has quorum and only needs 2/3 of the 51 present to convict.

And we all know Romney will show up

4
RussianBot6969 4 points ago +5 / -1

And they're still having to resort to bullshit underhanded tactics like this. No one other than my brainwashed proggie coworkers think that Biden is a legitimate president.

8
RussianBot6969 8 points ago +8 / -0

Republicans (the non-cucked ones): This is the most illegitimate, unconstitutional impeachment ever!!!

Democrats: Hold my beer....

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was a show of force, plain and simple. The Empire is striking back and they want to scare any normies and sunshine patriots into silence.

3
RussianBot6969 3 points ago +3 / -0

A corollary to that law is that if Democrats are accusing their political opponents of something terrible, they are in the process of doing that very thing.

6
RussianBot6969 6 points ago +6 / -0

What she means is that so many real humans showed up to vote for Trump that it exceeded their predetermined Dominion specifications. They weren't supposed to lose. HIJACKED!!!!

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

End the lockdowns. It's a cheaper and more effective stimulus.

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's the truth of the matter:

People who still have gainful employment don't deserve and shouldn't receive a government handout (this includes myself, as much as I could use an extra $2k)

People who have lost their jobs due to the lockdown, some help for them is fine, BUT A MORE EFFECTIVE AND CHEAPER STIMULULS WOULD BE REOPENING THE ECONOMY

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stall it and draw a line in the sand. If nothing else, force those fuckers in congress to have to come in to work another day.

5
RussianBot6969 5 points ago +5 / -0

Beijing Mitch is ready to get back to enriching himself while whoring the American economy out to the CCP. It's been a lean 4 years for him and his commie-loving family; they had to get by on hundreds of millions of dollars instead of the billions they are used to. Mitch needs to look after his family, too, after all.

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump's not even out of office yet (and God willing, he won't be for at least another four years) and Beijing Mitch is already rushing to get back to business as usual.

Fuck every Republican whose pathetic ass was saved by Trump's support.

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know what they say about guys with big carbon footprints...

view more: Next ›