2
RustyJShackleford 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're playing it off like the mixed up test results.

From the article:

Clark had gone to the drive thru testing sight at Manatee Rural Health, but before she was able to get swabbed, she left the line because she realized it was for people with symptoms only.

https://www.mysuncoast.com/2020/07/19/concerns-arise-some-receive-positive-covid-results-never-got-tested/

I saw it said somewhere else, but this lends the idea credit.: You schedule a test. You check in (to the "symptom line," no doubt). You never get the test, but since you scheduled a test (and even checked into the symptom line), you must have COVID symptoms. BAM. Assumed COVID positive.

4
RustyJShackleford 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's back. They did the same to a bunch of conservative news sites. They claimed it was a technical glitch. You know, like they actually tested out the new blacklist code live. They weren't ready to throw the switch just yet. It was an accident.

4
RustyJShackleford 4 points ago +4 / -0

First actual answer I've been able to find. Thank you.

2
RustyJShackleford 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was just trying to figure out the same thing. I see something about a windows DNS exploit, but thats it. Don't know if that has anything to do with it. SEVERAL other sites were down as well.

14
RustyJShackleford 14 points ago +14 / -0

Because the CDC says that it "will likely change." Sounds like that bit is there to keep people from talking about it because we should expect it to be classified as an epidemic again soon.

7
RustyJShackleford 7 points ago +7 / -0

You have a shit ton of .223 at your local gun store? We have a 2 box minimum that stays on the shelves for about 20 minutes a couple times a week. Also, cool governor. Trade you for the tool, err, governor of AZ.

10
RustyJShackleford 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not to detract from the work of the journalist, but is no one else actually reading the reports like this? No wonder the numbers are all wrong.

1
RustyJShackleford 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't count on it. We can't even get accurate number for the Rona. There's no way anyone is going to report accurate numbers for deaths caused by Rona fear mongers.

by rl38345
1
RustyJShackleford 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if she did, would the names ever see the light of day? Are the people who would be questioning her trustworthy? Or does it all just get buried. Assuming that even happens before the Arkencide sets in.

35
RustyJShackleford 35 points ago +35 / -0

I'm rarely surprised by how rude the press can be, but WOW. In what world was it appropriate to ask snarky questions while he was signing that?

19
RustyJShackleford 19 points ago +19 / -0

Smoke. It was not tear gas, it was smoke. Must have been an irritation because it wasn't PTFE free gluten free farm raised smoke.

by Fujiada
12
RustyJShackleford 12 points ago +12 / -0

Wow. Just caught the end. She pretty much doused them all with gasoline, lit a match, and calmly left the room. Fantastic job.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
17
RustyJShackleford 17 points ago +18 / -1

Vaccine for everyone who wants to get it. Not everyone is going to want to get it.

THAT'S what I like to hear!

13
RustyJShackleford 13 points ago +13 / -0

I don't want people to think this is dependent on a vaccine.

Good.

30
RustyJShackleford 30 points ago +30 / -0

Same here, but $10 says the lefties will scream to have it forced on everyone.

4
RustyJShackleford 4 points ago +4 / -0

I should probably clarify, really, the unmasking has to be required to perform the duties of the requestor, so a bit more strict than I said. But yes, if it is proven that the unmasking was not needed specifically for intel reasons, a crime has been committed. Whether anyone will actually prosecute that, I somehow doubt it. Look for the youtube link someone posted about the specifics of unmasking.Was very informative.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›