LOL They did this here in New Zealand. Cannot ask, not even verbally or informally, whether someone is of maori descent or not.
Then they came to collect statistics of how "underrepresented" maori were in Masters/PhD programs, and they couldn't get any data because it was illegal for anyone to collect it. And all their claims were dismissed because they had no evidence to support it.
Now they're angry and want it reversed, again.
Honk fucking honk.
You don't have to add "in Minecraft", it's a quote from a book:
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers
shit on all of them equally
Correct. Wasn't trying to "poor me" AZ, I was amping up to show the political bias of the whole shitshow.
All the vaccines are shit, the AZ one is being singled out to punish the UK:
Site is shit, but the numbers come straight out of http://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html
...what?
That's a false dichotomy. A group of parents can easily pool money together to pay a qualified individual to teach their kids difficult subjects. Said teacher will likely get a better wage without the ridiculous overhead of the public school system. Third option, way better.
You're also ignoring something: It's High School level. It can't be THAT hard if you graduated from High School, now can it?
on your shoulder for 8 minutes
Fixed that for you.
With a knee on my shoulder? I'll take the pin down.
It's about 40x more deadly than the flu shot, or about 80x if you take into account that you need two shots instead of one. So to answer your question: A lot.
Plenty of doctors are willing to help you fren:
Consensus building. You lock out an account, have the bots descend on the tweet to excoriate the person who posted it, and it looks like everyone disagrees with him.
Someone's gotta pay for all that money they're spending on illegal aliens:
He's not wrong. Here's the data when the adverse effects are limited to "DEATH" (note that there's more entries for people dying than just this one, there's brain death, cardiac death... I chose 10011906 (DEATH) only for the sake of simplicity and making a direct comparison simpler to interpret):
But what's really going to blow your mind is this:
The second table has ALL the entries in the VAERS database, i.e., all the reports where something was reported immediately following the vaccine. There's no material difference between 2020 and 2019. 2021, however, is almost to the level of 2020 and 2019, and we're just entering April.
What does this mean? If you look at the "DEATH" table, compare to the table for all entries, what it looks like is that there's people getting vaccinated for the coof that, in other circumstances, wouldn't (and shouldn't) have gotten vaccinated.
2021 looks like it's going to be a screamer. Expect 150,000+ entries in the VAERS database.
EDIT: I transposed the table, had to fix my post. the spike is in 2021, not 2020. Holy shit this is going to be hysterical.
"Challenging your whiteness"? WTF is that even supposed to mean?
And they continue to push the envelope. We've gone from vaccine passports being a conspiracy theory to "okay, but they won't be mandatory!" Next steps should be "just because you need them to do everything doesn't mean they're mandatory!", followed by "okay, they're mandatory, but the tattoos on the arm are optional!"
Ah right, I did see that one, but glided by because of one obvious thing: The vaccines have, in fact, not been developed to meet the same safety and efficacy standards :D
Still, I don't think they saw it as significant in that document, whereas it's very significant IRL.
Boar's head is underappreciated. It's freaking delicious.
A very important difference between the scenario as presented and how it went down in reality is the use of antivirals and therapeutics. The scenario goes into detail about how some therapeutics were chosen, social media spread stories about side effects, and how it undermined confidence in further therapeutics that proved to be more efficient, etc.
Instead, the media and the globalists were adamant against therapeutics (not just HCQ), and continued to push against them even in the face of strong supporting evidence. This is also shown in the number of studies that were retracted after the fact on HCQ.
Why? Because that was the cudgel they needed against President Trump. He bit with the rushed vaccines, but wouldn't have gone along with the rest of their shit (you think Trump would OK "vaccine passports"? Not in your lifetime). The endgame was the vaccines and the control, but the road there was more rocky. They just needed a few extra corpses to pave their way to power.
EDIT: Reading on (damn it's long, and the writer is not very gifted), there's another thing they missed. When they talk about the "groups opposed to the vaccine", they don't mention once those who are skeptical of a rushed vaccine. I think this is going to catch them by surprise, and also why there doesn't seem to be a cohesive narrative against them. Notice how the initial response to questions about vaccine safety followed the "plan" closely, but fell on its face when they started labeling people as "anti-vaxxers". Why? Because many people are not against vaccines in general, but are very much against the experimental and under-tested new tech.
EDIT2: This one they're following to a T: "To reach members of these groups—which, with the exception of the pocketed communities, were largely spread throughout the country—the US government added a new, aggressive advertising campaign to its pro-vaccination efforts. This campaign provided targeted internet advertisements to individuals as they conducted web searches or visited anti-vaccination websites. If someone searched Google for “Corovax side effects,” for example, a sidebar advertisement appeared on the results page explaining the benefits of the vaccine. Likewise, if someone wished to view the Kalocivir (note: this is the fictional antiviral used in the scenario, which had side effects) vomiting video on YouTube, they would first have to watch either a montage of pictures illustrating the effects of SPARS or a clip of Paul Farmer’s explanation of Corovax’s benefits."
EDIT3: Oh LOL, this one is amazing. The author asks the following: "Given the uncertain long-term safety profile of the Corovax vaccine, why are both science and sympathy necessary when communicating about a possible correlation between vaccination and adverse events?" Going by how the leftists are reacting towards the unvaccinated, the answer is "it's not necessary at all!"
EDIT4: Very telling paragraph here: "As the pandemic tapered off, several influential politicians and agency representatives came under fire for sensationalizing the severity of the event for perceived political gain. As with many public health interventions, successful efforts to reduce the impact of the pandemic created the illusion that the event was not nearly as serious as experts suggested it would be. President Archer’s detractors in the Republican Party seized the opportunity to publicly disparage the President and his administration’s response to the pandemic, urging voters to elect “a strong leader with the best interests of the American people at heart.” ". And there's the playbook, only the author flipped the parties. Also, there were no successful efforts to reduce the impact of the pandemic LOL (lockdowns, mask mandates, neither of them had a significant effect vs. places that didn't use those two).
That's a typo, it should read:
It lacks diversity, experts.
Donations (blood and organs) are a funny thing. The medical staff are certainly getting paid. The hospitals/clinics are, too. And the person receiving the donation is surely getting a benefit, if not monetary. The only person who gets nothing out of the whole thing is the donor.
It's a nice post, but there isn't a lot of actual data. Mostly examples which they don't make clear if they're hypothetical or not.
I love posting pictures of the Mosin or the Number 4 just for the idiot to go "see, that's totally not a weapon of war!"
Protip: Write upside down. Your handwriting will be regular, but different from yours.
"Chase down people who disagree with me until they agree so they're not a threat to democracy!"
Notice how they're switching to "well, it's very rare to get a blood clot, stop being paranoid!" as if blood clots are the only side effect of the underdeveloped vaccines.
COVID vaccines are ~40x more likely to kill you than the flu vaccine. It might be a low chance, but it's unbelievably higher than regular vaccines.