Article III, Section 2
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Amendment XI
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
Please tell me how your interpretation makes sense, because I’m simply not seeing it
If they vote against this case, they’re also invalidating the clause that says how many electors each state gets (it’s literally the same sentence). I’d bet Texas sends 400 electors in retaliation if that happens
There’s so much wrong with this, but I’ll just point out
but mostly SCOTUS does not get involved in state squabbles
“Getting involved in state squabbles” is quite literally the explicit reason SCOTUS exists. Who else is supposed to handle them?
When a household name is handcuffed in a cell, yes. Until then, no
Anyone who’s tested positive and quarantining should make reservations. Don’t inform them of this until you’re seated. Doesn’t matter if something’s open if there’s no staff to keep it open
Electors meet in their respective state capitols. We’ll need more human chains
> be me
> hear about campaign to call AG
hi mr Becerra, please join the Texas lawsuit. ... no? Call my Senator to complain? Okay... I guess I’ll do that
> look up senator’s contact info
hi Sen. Harris, please support the lawsuit that would directly damage your campaign... no? Go shove what where?
Someone please help free me from this hellscape
Nothing’s official yet as far as I know, but there’s rumors that Florida and Louisiana are strongly considering joining
Amendment XII
...the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed...
The President of the Senate is also called the Vice President. Pence runs the show there in the same way the Speaker runs the House
Martial law to enforce a police state of commie clown world bullshit
drake_no.jpg
Martial law to enforce the laws and Constitution of the United States, which could include the death penalty for those found guilty of violating them
drake_yes.jpg
I’ll join you, although there are ethical concerns when we get to the tech CEOs. I might have a conflict of interest with one in particular
POTUS has to be 35+. Maybe that’s what you remembered?
That fucker Wilson let them get income tax, the Federal Reserve, and popular election of Senators (they used to be chosen by state legislatures) all in the same year. Future times will look back at 1913 as the year our troubles really started
Thank you Doggos for setting this up. By the way, u/spez is a cuck, I have very reliable sources telling me this
The difference is that until about two months ago everyone just assumed we’d be able to vote our way back to the right path. That’s why Trump won in 2016
Now we’re seeing that even that isn’t possible. There’s probably tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of people literally just waiting to see what the courts do before they decide if the Minecraft servers need to be turned online. Peaceful resolution is obviously ideal, but if that’s never going to happen, even in theory... I know for my part if Trump said the storm is upon us I’d join the fight
My assessment
-
Trump will be inaugurated for his second term in January. This shit is all to root out who’s actually loyal and who’s not
-
optics only matter to the extent that corrupt officials understand what happens to them if they continue to enable the corruption
-
if SCOTUS cucks out, optics are completely irrelevant. Now tell me, what happens when 80 million of the most heavily armed population in world history decides that they are not represented in their government and that something needs to be done to fix that problem?
Other friendly reminder: rumor has it Sidney Powell is a military lawyer and can prosecute these types of cases
It is, but I’m convinced the reason Trump fans aren’t banned is so that Chyna can data mine them more
There’s no challenge Chunk Yogurt can’t overcome. Except not being a sweaty wildebeest
Can’t watch (and don’t want to click on faceberg links). What’s going on?
Just nuke San Francuckso, Los Diablos, and Sacrilego, and 95% of our problems are solved
“Randomly”
Why do voting machines use iOS? If they don’t why do they need iOS updates?
That aside, the other point I didn’t mention is that these machines shouldn’t need update deployed on the fly in the first place. The banking system still uses a ton of COBOL and FORTRAN internally because the code was written 50 years ago and it fucking works. Our nuclear arsenals are basically unhackable since the ancient frameworks are incompatible with anything used in the modern world. Voting simply needs a basic “votes go in, totals come out,” anyone saying internet is required needs to give a damn good reason for it
One of the explicit reasons SCOTUS exists is to resolve “Controversies between two or more States.” Not making a ruling here is an admission that they’re completely useless