Impressive length.
What the fuck.
Lmao imagine Jake Tapper has to wear a sign around his neck that says FAKE NEWS every time he’s on the air
Gina Haspel has been against declassifying docs related to Russia hoax / Flynn investigation. Given the McCabe hearing happened today, it could be related to that. Regardless, she is not our friend.
Shouldn’t this be trivial to verify by randomly calling mail-in voters and asking them if they did in fact vote?
Highly recommend going on Reddit, searching “Pompeo” and ordering by total comments in last day. They are freaking out about this
Don't worry Jake, it works both ways. I will not be hiring any wokies at my company.
Come on. It clearly says on that page that 1800 is used for privacy purposes
remember when they quarantined us and then a month later the whole world was quarantined?
But which 132k? The analysis here is from the voter file data, and AFAICT there is no way to link each of these voters to a ballot?
Right, but the problem is that this research is based on voter files -- not ballots. Ballots are anonymous. Is there a way to match each ballot to which voter cast it? I'm under the impression that there's not. So how do you know which ballots to invalidate?
They wouldn't match up if people were voting for Biden and republicans on the rest of the ticket.... which a lot of people did. In case you haven't noticed, the media brainwashed a significant percent of the country into thinking orange man bad. I know my dad at least voted for Biden + republican downticket.
yes? If "muh blockchain" and "muh watermarks" were true, they would have evidence and that's exactly what I would expect them to say. And Rudy wouldn't be filing suit about "we can't watch the ballots" if they had anything even close to hard evidence of systemic fraud.
People here are starting to sound like "here's how bernie can still win," it's embarassing. I don't blame Trump for not conceding, but if he doesn't have actual evidence of SYSTEMIC, industrial-scale fraud, this is going nowhere and you're just coping.
How do you differentiate "voted only for Joe Biden" from "voted for Joe Biden and the rest republican?"
I'm a computer scientist, and I promise you this is nothing but retarded Q bullshit
The Dems answer to this is that people voted for Biden and then for republicans downticket. How can you differentiate that? It’s what my dad did. There were a lot of people who don’t like Trump but don’t want the democrats in control either.
I guess the best counterargument is that this was most pronounced only in swing states.
No it doesn’t. It sounds stupidly retarded if you know anything about computers.
And btw here is the head of CISA explicitly saying the watermark BS is false: https://twitter.com/cisakrebs/status/1324799793709928449?s=21
where's hunter?
> Spend 4 years calling Drumpf a fascist
> Unironically make a list of undesirables
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_action_role-playing_game
on the chans it means someone pretending to have inside info but they're actually bullshitting
If the watermark LARP were true, Trump would have started pressing it by now. It's a LARP.
This is from September 24th.
Hey guys, I know it says my comment only has one upvote, but I just found a box of 100k votes and they’re all upvotes.
gateway pundit is the king of overhyping bullshit stories that are either fake or underwhelming
We being who?
We’ve completely taken over the national conversation. A lot of it is because people hate us. But the narrative is driven by Trump, and Trump voters. We have a lot of power.