2
SamuelColt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The response should have been a trial and subsequent execution of irresponsible fucks like Anthony Fauci who think their precious "research" justifies putting everyone at risk of lab leaks.

5
SamuelColt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I made a couple of grand off of their shitty IPO. Would definitely never hold that stock long term.

5
SamuelColt 5 points ago +5 / -0

ATF will just issue a new regulation saying it's a firearm.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

?? I didn't call anyone a "glowie." I didn't even remotely imply anyone is a "glowie."

I get frustrated when Big Tech workers talk about how terrible Big Tech is but just continue going in to work and doing their jobs for those azzholes. Better to be a "useless keyboard warrior" than to be that guy.

But if, as you say, you're actually proactively doing something to work against the problems, then kudos to you and sorry for calling you out.

3
SamuelColt 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's trying to take away the intelligence "community's" global megaphone. Twitter is a core tool for globohomo's efforts to "spread democracy" (that is, unseat politicians who aren't onboard with the program). They've been using it for years to peddle influence all over the map. They can't have someone coming in and taking that away from them.

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, OK. All media outlets acting in concert. Totally organic news story. Just like when all of Silicon Valley cancelled Alex Jones at the same time. It wasn't a coordinated hit at all.

-1
SamuelColt -1 points ago +5 / -6

If the internet had existed in 1943, this is the equivalent of popping up in a thread about the German government and saying "I'm a senior officer in the SS."

You know you are part of the problem, right?

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

So even though the US Marshals are ostensibly responsible for federal judiciary security, they've been abdicating their duties to the state police this entire time?

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, don't "do this 1000 times if you have to." They don't "have to." 1 page bills. 20 bills maximum per congressional session. Limit is 1 session every 2 years.

Every 1000 pages of federal legislation they wipe off the books earns them an additional 1 page bonus bill they can pass. Every federal department or agency they terminate earns them an additional 10 pages of bonus bills.

Edit: And no more agencies with the power to legislate by regulation. The practice should be banned.

11
SamuelColt 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fuck Soleimani. He was a legitimate target and deserved to die.

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +4 / -0

And the FBI as a whole isn't even interested in stopping the cartel, just getting a piece of the pie in the form of regular cash seizures to fatten their own budget.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who cares? Twitter isn't real life. Who is that going to influence other than losers who already love Beta O'Fag?

10
SamuelColt 10 points ago +10 / -0

Also, how utterly pointless is that? What was accomplished by supplanting nuclear with wind for that period of time? Congratulations to the green brigade, you managed to step on reliable green power with shittier green power.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Aside from whatever geopolitical games the State Dept and IC are playing, the boomer "Russia is bad" mentality is definitely playing into it. I had a debate last week with a boomer about Russia/Ukraine and he got irrationally emotional and angry. There is a raw hatred that was taught to that generation that I personally don't understand.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahaha, you do realize that it takes years of exploration first, don't you? Don't be a retard.

Yes, asshole, so let's stop dicking around and get it started. No time like the present.

7
SamuelColt 7 points ago +9 / -2

OK, then you pick up the tab for the rest of us at the gas pump.

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +4 / -0

People aren't this stupid. If your phone can accurately show you where you are on a map and give you turn by turn directions as you drive, then that's exactly how precise any geolocation data will be, too.

Anyone making this imprecision claim is acting in bad faith.

view more: Next ›