Thank you for at least looking at this as though it is written in legalese rather than common English.
Yes military communication happens in common tongue with meanings as defined by Webster while the regulations are written with words as defined by Blacks law dictionary.
I would only add that you may consider raising your perspective, 40k foot as opposed to 35k. By this I am referring to the District of Columbia. Is it part of the United States? Or is it a foreign entity that has been ruling over the sovereign United States?
Remember the swamp communicates in legalese not common English.
Have so many forgotten “that it depends on what your definition of is, is”.
Look up anything you do not fully understand the legal definition of. Then read 11.3 again and decide for yourself.
The time for spoon feeding is long over. How can we hope to have our Republic without putting in the effort to comprehend and maintain it.
To truly participate will require a greater degree of sophistication from us than in the past when We the people were lulled to sleep by the globalists and their puppets.
https://tjaglcspublic.army.mil/dod-low-manual
Army.mil url, trust it or not that’s up to you Fren.
11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration of the occupation after the general close of military operations. 11.3.1 End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when the conditions for its application are no longer met.81 In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the Occupying Power.82 Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control.83 For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory. Belligerent occupation also may end when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the Occupying Power and the State of the occupied territory (although, as discussed in the following subsection, certain GC obligations may continue to apply).84 For example, if a new, 79 For example, John D. Negroponte & Jeremy Greenstock, Letter Dated 8 May 2003 from the Permanent Representatives of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/2003/538 (“the United States, the United Kingdom, and Coalition partners, acting under existing command and control arrangements through the Commander of Coalition Forces, have created the Coalition Provisional Authority, which includes the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, to exercise the powers of government temporarily, and, as necessary, especially to provide security, to allow the delivery of humanitarian aid, and to eliminate weapons of mass destruction. The United States, the United Kingdom and Coalition partners, working through the Coalition Provisional Authority, shall inter alia, provide for security in and for the provisional administration of Iraq ... .”). 80 For example, U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1483, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1483, 2 (May 22, 2003) (“Noting the letter of 8 May 2003 from the Permanent Representatives of the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the President of the Security Council (S/2003/538) and recognizing the specific authorities, responsibilities, and obligations under applicable international law of these states as occupying powers under unified command (the ‘Authority’),”); U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 661, U.N. Doc. S/RES/661 (1990) (Aug. 6, 1990) (“Determined to bring the invasion and occupation of Kuwait by Iraq to an end and to restore the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Kuwait,”). 81 Refer to § 11.2.2 (Standard for Determining When Territory Is Considered Occupied). 82 WINTHROP, MILITARY LAW & PRECEDENTS 801 (“The status of military government continues from the inception of the actual occupation till the invader is expelled by force of arms, or himself abandons the conquest, or till, under a treaty of peace, the country is restored to its original allegiance or becomes incorporated with the domain of the prevailing belligerent.”). 83 Refer to § 11.2.2.1 (“Actually Placed” – Effectiveness of Occupation). 84 Refer to § 11.2.2.3 (“Of the Hostile Army” – Belligerent Occupation Applies to Enemy Territory). 769
independent government of the previously occupied territory assumes control of the territory and consents to the presence of the previously occupying forces, then such a situation would no longer be considered a belligerent occupation. Similarly, if a peace treaty legitimately transfers the territory to the sovereignty of the Occupying Power, then the Occupying Power would no longer be characterized as such. However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory.85 11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of military operations.86 In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC: • 1 through 12 (general provisions and common articles, e.g., the Protecting Power continues to function, and the derogation for security reasons continues to apply); • 27, 29 through 34 (humane treatment); • 47 (preserves rights as against change by annexation or arrangement with the local authorities so long as occupation lasts); • 49 (transfers, evacuation, and deportation); • 51, 52 (prohibitions against certain compulsory service and protection of workers); • 53 (respect for property); • 59, 61 through 63 (facilitating relief programs); • 64 through 77 (criminal proceedings); and • 143 (access by Protecting Powers and the ICRC).87 The one-year time limit for the cessation of the application of the GC (apart from the provisions that continue to apply to the extent that the Occupying Power exercises the functions of government in occupied territory) was proposed to account for situations like those of 85 Refer to § 11.4.2 (Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory). 86 Refer to § 10.3.4 (Commencement and Duration of Protected Person Status). 87 GC art. 6 (“In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to 34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.”). 770
Germany and Japan after World War II.88 AP I provides that the 1949 Geneva Conventions and AP I shall cease to apply, in the case of occupied territories, on the termination of the occupation;89 coalition partners that are Occupying Powers and Parties to AP I would be bound by this rule. In any case, individuals entitled to GC protection who remain in the custody of the Occupying Power following the end of occupation retain that protection until their release, repatriation, or re-establishment.90 In addition, it may be appropriate following the end of occupation to continue to apply by analogy certain rules from the law of belligerent occupation, even if such rules do not apply as a matter of law.91 11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER
http://web.archive.org/web/20201222031321/http://notfooledbygovernment.com/gold-fringed-flag-facts/
We are all in for the show together, whatever direction that may be it has been interesting.
May the Source and creator of all things bless you all, even the haters.
Best learn how to pray then Frens.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/522/67/
The decision is worth reading.
https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/693/44/f74bf8fba3ce40739c1425f3488cce7c.jpg
The anticipation is agonizing. For us and them.
https://nationaltoday.com/national-popcorn-day/
Indeed it is Fren 🍿🍿
Firstly nice troll 👏 👏 👏
100% Yes. I was speaking the other day about how Trump the showman may run this out to get everyone invested in the outcome. Even forcing the true neutral political agnostics to pick a side.
Best learn to pray the way it was meant to be done Frens.
To pray like they have never prayed before they should learn how it was meant to be done.
https://www.arktekice.com/post/datbase-of-sedition
20,000 incidents
My perspective formed from multiple on the ground first person reports.
It’s true that the protesters at the capital did move forward through teargas, pepper balls, and rubber bullets.
I repeat they walked forward through that deterrence unfazed and when they reached the top of the inauguration stage they stood proud rather than tearing the building down stone by stone and lynching any officials they could find like a bunch of Jacobins.
In time they became aware that a woman had died inside the building that day, and still they did not press forward and end the lives of those inside.
This sounds like real Americans to me.
Yes some people did smash the shit out of some windows. But how many people in that mass on the inauguration stage even suspected that such activities were happening on the other three sides of the building?
Yes Jan 6 2021 has significance. Decide it’s meaning on your own as self-sovereign souls. The media will do all they can to frame this to hurt you. There is nothing new in this choice on their part.
However if we all keep playing into it do we deserve anything better?
Every day is our opportunity to take on a more sophisticated relationship with the world we interact with.
Step up and play the game by your own choosing or eat the shit sandwich they keep dangling in front of you.
They think you are dumb. Why would you think it too?
Controlling my optimism, but would you call this winning?
OP to locate your balls call 605–475–6968.
As I understand it this image is moments before she received the “vaccine”.
I think it's safe to say at this point that "movie 2 has ended".
"At present a vast majority of the audience having very little to do with their lives except be energetically invested in the outcome of this great drama we have been privy to are consistently perched on the edge of their seats.
The true neutrals are finally being pushed to make their choice, "Authoritarianism or Individual Liberty?", bringing forth their additional energies into the vortex.
Even persons who had ignored the word chakra their entire lives can sense the charge, the potential of this moment.
Will Biden really be inaugurated?
Will it be a deep fake false flag?
Is Trump going to do anything with his PEADs or just lay down and die?
Did the the people hang their hopes and intentions on the wrong man?
Has it all been a sham?
Find out next time in part three of our ongoing series the Great Awakening."
Done in my best dragon ball Z narrator voice.
Or to fake his assassination and blame Trump supporters.
Understanding is beyond the grasp of a tiny minority of people. It may take time but I assure you attaining comprehension is worth the effort.
Before Trump I never thought I’d care enough to learn these things.