1
SaulGoodman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Beyond the insanity of the statement, the correct grammatical construction would be "woven" not "weaved." Unless she meant that "white supremacy" is currently being "weaved" into our founding documents and principles?

3
SaulGoodman 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think he's pretty funny. I liked him on Anthony Cumia's show.

6
SaulGoodman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Judge just ruled not to sequester the jury after people went nuts over a police-involved shooting (Dante Wright). One of the jurors is from the neighborhood where the Wright shooting happened (Brooklyn Heights). The judge thinks the jurors will see unrest related to the incident but won't be affected because it's not unrest related to a verdict. I don't see how riots and unrest against police wouldn't prejudice jurors against a MN police officer like Chauvin.

0
SaulGoodman 0 points ago +1 / -1

But it's a religious ceremony with accompanying legal recognition (e.g., divorce laws, marriage property laws, wills and trust - when you die your, property goes to your spouse usually). It's not just a one-time ceremony.

2
SaulGoodman 2 points ago +2 / -0

They needed to figure out how many fraudulent ballots were necessary to get to 50%+1.

18
SaulGoodman 18 points ago +18 / -0

The voting machines generate a high number of ballot errors. For each ballot with an "error," the vote counters get to "adjudicate" a ballot and, of course, they "adjudicate" the ballots in favor of Sleepy Joe. Adjudication is where a lot of the funny business happens.

8
SaulGoodman 8 points ago +8 / -0

Here's a link to DePerno's election defense fund: https://www.depernolaw.com/

Looks like he's doing good work. I'd rather contribute to him than the RNC.

4
SaulGoodman 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's sort of like how Lance Armstrong "won" all those Tour de France titles. Of course, with politics there isn't a governing body to strip Dems of all the laws they pass once the cheating is irrefutably revealed and everyone accepts it in decades hence (see, e.g., JFK stealing the election from Nixon in 1960).

5
SaulGoodman 5 points ago +5 / -0

We'll see how cross goes. I think Tobin is the only witness that the State has presented thus far that actually helped proved their case.

1
SaulGoodman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the hell are they at the border? It's not like they miraculously descended from heaven and appeared at the border. Where are the parents?

4
SaulGoodman 4 points ago +4 / -0

So Gardner was trying, on the one hand, to argue that she was neutral and objective in the McCloskey case but on the other hand, she was fundraising by sending out emails about the case that begged for money.

3
SaulGoodman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did Hall pass Floyd the counterfeit bill? I must have missed that part. Another strange thing about Hall is that Floyd claimed he was claustrophobic and refused to sit in a police car when he was sitting in a car with Hall moments before.

2
SaulGoodman 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know, if I was facing murder charges like Chauvin, I would demand that my lawyer do this.

One of the prosecution lawyers has been trying to get a Johnnie Cochran-style rhyme about Chauvin to catch on: "He did not get up and he did not let up!" Pretty cringey IMO but maybe it works on the slow of thinking.

7
SaulGoodman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The funny thing is Floyd's "girlfriend" (nickname: momma) testified that Floyd worked out every day, went to the gym, lifted weights, etc. This supports the idea that Floyd was strong and police struggled bringing him into compliance when he resisted arrest. It would also support the idea that pinning him to the ground, including with a knee on the neck, was not lethal force and that Chauvin would not have had an intent to kill (reckless or otherwise) when he pinned a strong man like Floyd to the ground.

view more: Next ›