The establishment media's narrative is that the spike in overnight votes was simply due to the large number of absentee ballots that were cast, that the spikes were just further reporting, and that this isn't evidence of fraud. How do we counter this?
Example from a Wisconsin NBC station:
President Trump held a roughly 100,000 vote lead late Tuesday night. However, in Wisconsin’s largest county, election workers finished counting 169,519 absentee ballots between 3:00 and 4:00 a.m. Absentee votes are believed to heavily support the Democrats and it proved true in Wisconsin, as Biden gained a lead in Wisconsin by roughly 20,000 votes, with NBC News projecting the Badger State for Biden.
Another example from a DC CBS station:
To find out what caused this shift, the team reached out to two elections experts, Gary Nordlinger, a politics professor at The George Washington University and David Becker, the Executive Director at the Center For Election Innovation and Research.
Both experts confirmed that this was not indicative of voter fraud.
The vote totals shifted simply because there were more votes to count. When most of us went to sleep on Election Night, there were still hundreds-of-thousands of votes not yet counted, including many absentee ballots, which favored Former Vice President Biden.
"This has been an unprecedented election for early voting this year," said Nordlinger. "So you still (had) hundreds-of-thousands, if not over a million ballots to count. The difference between when we went to bed and woke up this morning was further reporting of results."
We need to get in front of this narrative now. This will become the repetitive mantra until people get sick of the whole discussion and their minds become occupied with the frivolity of day-to-day living. What is the best rebuttal to this? Messaging is super important and I don't think pointing out a spike in votes will persuade the persuadable population.