Here my idea: A man representing the establishment plays the game where figures pop out of a set of holes and you have to punch them on the head to make them disappear again. One figure is Trump who is about to disappear as the man (establishment) just hits him on the head with his bat. At the same time a new figure pops out of another hole, the WallStreetBets mascot ;) Like the idea?

The last days felt like a news blackout because no new strategy was announced. In fact there seems to be a last option, the "quo warranto" legal action against Biden after inauguration. Maybe it was the strategy to not reveal it, but now should be the time to use it. Are there any news?: https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/01/12/quo-warranto-the-two-words-biden-pelosi-fear-most/

I' from Germany and made the following discovery:

The Wau Holland Foundation donates to Wikileaks: https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate

Wau Holland was a co-founder of the CCC (Chaos Computer Club) and the Wau Holland Foundation is his administration of estates after he died. The CCC is a hacker club. I looked into their early magazines from the 80's and there self-appointed "psychopaths" wrote articles against modern network infrastructure (ISDN) with the claim that they enable surveillance. When I remember this time everyone was sick of modems with 2400 to 14400 baud, so this was definitely not in the best interest of hackers. In the late 90's the hacker called "Tron" committed "suicide" (which nobody really believed) after he developed a cryptographic telephone. I think the CCC was an instrument to attract hackers just to be able to have control over such things. (There is even someone else whose dissertation about cryptocaphic telephones was suddenly cancelled at the same time). Today they have an Antifa-flag at the entrance of their conference and talks are only about lefty topics. Security of voting machines used to be an issue but now is somehow forgotten even if the conference takes place now (it's usually between Christmas and New Year).

You can even donate to the campaign of the Wau Holland foundation against voting machines: http://www.wauland.de/en/donate/

The campaign website is rather outdated though. Not that there are any news involving compromised voting machines. Have you heard of any recently? Neither do I ;) https://www.wauland.de/en/projects/campaign-against-voting-computers/

What do you think? Is this the reason why Assange gets no pardon from Trump?

I came across this article: https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari/watch/trump-s-latest-con-ripping-off-maga-fans-after-losing-98046021506

Is there transparency of donations and spendings of the trump campaign? Is the "trump campaign" a private company or is it some other construct?

Greetings from Germany,

just last year I was able to "decode" what's happening by reading a sociological book from the 70s, called "Die Arbeit tun die anderen" (the others do the work) by Helmut Schelsky. Let' start with a medieval society as an example:

You have craftsmen, farmers, a king with his officers and clergy including the pope. The craftsmen and farmers produce food and tools, all what you need for a living. The king and his officers declare rules, build infrastructure, store up for bad times and defend the country against invaders (or invade others ;) ). The clergy preaches from the bible and teaches novices reading the bible, make others fear ("if you don't believe you go to hell") and sell indulgence. So if you ask now "who does real productive work" then the clergy drops out first. The craftsmen and farmers do the most real work, the king also if he is a good king. If he starts useless wars then he wastes precious resources of the society. So there is a "key classifier": "clergy" vs "non-clergy".

Next you have the class theory of Karl Marx. A "class" is a group of people sharing common interests emerging from their position in society. For example an owner of a production plant wants to pay his workers as little as possible and his products as expensive as possible. Two different factory owners have this same "class interest" because of their position in society, not because they "conspire". This is important to note that "conspiracy theory" is used to ridicule secret collaboration which of course does not exist. What we have to look for are "class interests" which exist and are openly visible. For example two bakers bake bread at 4am and need the permission to do so. They don't conspire, they have just the same "class interest". Karl Marx identified the proletariat and the bourgeoisie as the two main classes at his time during the industrial revolution, but he failed to identify the clergy as actually the most important class of the "mass society" since the industrial revolution.

Now the trick is to transfer the "clergy" vs "non-clergy" classifier to today. Who is the clergy? That's everyone who produces information, i.e. "preaches" and produces emotions, especially fear. Of course the media pop into mind, but also artists, actors, singers, novel writers and so on. Important are also professors because today many believe "if it's science, it must be true". So the modern clergy is located in universities like in medieval cloisters with tons of students as novices, but their real use is to be "voting cattle". They invent things such as "critical race theory" and "man-made climate change". Critical race theory postulates that certain races or ethnicities are inherently evil and climate change is the modern "if you don't believe you will go to hell". Also NGO's who fight for all sorts of environmental problems that actually don't exist (California wildfires were mismanagement) or pretend to help at the other side of the world are a part of the clergy. They simply replace your actual reality with a kind of fiction that is created out of writing, sound and images. Therefore classified as "clergy". So we have this simple explanation:

Trump vs Biden is a Marxian class battle of "non-clergy" vs "clergy"

When you have understood this concept, remember the "king" and his officials. A king needs the "belief of legitimation" so that people follow him, even into wars. Who does he ask for help? Bingo! The clergy. The clergy delivers moral justification for is actions. Therefore being in the position to define morale is a powerful tool of rulership which is in the hands of the clergy. That's important to note that morale is not an universal measure such as "human rights", but morale gets created to fulfill certain goals. For example "human rights" are used as a tool to enforce migration or planned parenthood or all the other liberal stuff. How does the "king" pay the clergy? By letting it (mis)use the monopoly on legitimate use of force. Two examples from Germany. 1. The "old clergy", the Christian Church, raises taxes that are collected by the state. 2. The "new clergy", the public broadcasting stations, are allowed to collect about 20 Euros per month from every household. That's actually how I found out, I asked myself why this is possible and even visited court trials as a spectator and there I saw that the judge is in the board of the church at the same time and there had a superior from the public broadcasting station. Guess how the verdicts are spoken every time? Our church is not a real church, it's a bunch of liberal fools which I left of course, that's at least possible.

This is the explanation of the behavior of Democrats, they are clergy, and the Republicans, they cooperate with the clergy in exchange for moral justification and therefore are loyal to the clergy and not to Trump. Utah helps Trump because they are Mormons and therefore don't belong to the "Democrat/liberal clergy" and need neither climate change nor BLM to sort out their lives.

A good method of telling "clergy" from "non-clergy" is looking into Wikipedia even if it is not a trusted source. The people who belong to the "clergy" boast with their accomplishments there and this reads like "Later that year Biden was elected to a county council seat in a usually Republican district of New Castle County, Delaware, running on a liberal platform that included support for public housing in the suburbs". The platform doesn't matter, it's that they directly went into politics and did no real work. Or for Bernie Sanders: "He attended the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, where Martin Luther King Jr. gave the "I Have a Dream" speech". He marched for jobs, but he never wanted to have one. Others should do them, "others do the work", like the title of my book. Or maybe you know Sam Harris who speaks about "police violence", "peaceful protests" and "systemic racism" in his podcast. "Harris became interested in philosophical questions while at Stanford University after an experience with the empathogen–entactogen MDMA (colloquially known as ecstasy). The experience led him to be interested in the idea that he might be able to achieve spiritual insights without the use of drugs". Identified as "clergy".

Another method of telling "clergy" from "non-clergy" is to see if they promote work and vocational training as a means to make a living and respect blue collar jobs. I saw the video "What Matters 2020" directly on the BLM website and identified it as "clergy". Trump spoke positive about those who can repair cars and importance of vocational training: "non-clergy". Note here that even most labor unions are "clergy" because they are information producers and make horse trades with big companies, thereby enriching themselves and even using Antifa on their demonstrations.

And an indirect method of telling "clergy" from "non-clergy" is the attitude towards abortion. "planned parenthood" is "clergy", "pro life" is "non-clergy", in a sense that "pro life" is indeed also "clergy" because it is promoted by Christians and the like, but today's Christians do not use their belief to make a living in large numbers. Maybe they have one priest in a community of a hundred or so. The problem with the modern "clergy" is that they are large numbers of people who do no productive work and live solely from spreading "religion" and serving as "voting cattle" to the Democrats, thereby perpetuating the rulership of the "clergy".

Then there is the concept of "caring" which is identified as a method of rulership in my sociological literature. "Caring is the only method of terror, for which the cared owes thanks" and by this citation the German Nazis were addressed. The Democrats/liberals "care" for minorities in a sense that they want to rule over them. In the old days they wanted to maintain slavery, then malcolm x also identified what liberals really are (search for "malcolm x liberals" in Youtube) and this concept manifests itself today in "if you don't vote for me, you ain't black". At the same time they import them in mass numbers. Sounds like slavery? Therefore another simple equation:

Trumpism is the second abolishment of slavery

Maybe these insights are helpful, good luck!