2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +3 / -1

They all have 40mm grenade launchers? M203s? Can just anyone buy those?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, well in the last week barr has unequivocally been proven to be against trump. Nothing will come from him. It'll be the other guys. What do you think these "... remedial actions to be taken other than the sanctions..." will be?

That's my whole point with this EO. What is everyone here on TDW think those other actions are? It seems to me people are implying this somehow relates to insurrection or martial law, and it doesn't. If you are implying the recomendations other than the said sanctions are to use the insurrection act, well then maybe I buy it. This in itself is NOT that though.

People are making a jump that isn't explicitly stated with this. It doesn't talk about throwing anyone in prison, military tribunals, or any of that far-fetched stuff.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

what's the reason she was removed? The last 2 sentences there about "insulated from political bias?"

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

What can he do with the EO!? Have you people read it? It's about sanctions! That's it! It's not our saving grace. Show me quotes from it and your interpretation because I read it all last week and I'm not seeing it.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

What part do u think is the saving grace in it and how will it play out? I read the whole thing. It's about sanctions.

-2
Schroeder09 -2 points ago +1 / -3

It just allows him to freeze assets going to CCP sympathizers. It doesn't do anything for the election and I don't know why people are acting like it's such a big deal. Has nothing to do with being the first step to call martial law or anything like that either. They're totally separate issues. Call martial law or anything like that either. They're totally separate issues.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/13/us/politics/trump-allies-election-overturn-congress-pence.html

The times talked about this today. I know, it's the New York times. They lie. however, this one seems intuitive to me. How could one guy in the country just decide not to count the electoral votes? I would think we would have seen this more often if it were true and possible. It just doesn't seem right in my opinion. I hope it is.

Ps- I don't know how to archive stuff and don't want to take the time to do it so spare me the "you're giving the NYT traffic" comments. Just read the opposing opinion.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mike pence can't just NOT count the electoral votes like we keep seeing on here. Yes, this is NYT saying pence can't do that but I believe it. How could he just NOT count the votes? I'd that we're the case we'd see this all the time. I hope it's true. Just doesn't even make sense if u think about it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/13/us/politics/trump-allies-election-overturn-congress-pence.html

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

I take the tweets as desperation. He was frustrated and going off. :-(

by mtgc
1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

But does the EO give them access to the dominion machines, servers, etc? No. That's still something that needs subpoena.

by mtgc
1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does the senate and house play in to martial law or the insurrection act? Do they need to approve anything? I have a feeling the cucked RINOs in the legislature will joint the leftists and cry, "COUP!"

6
Schroeder09 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know what this picture is in reference to with him having and upside down face, but it's hilarious for whatever reason.

by mtgc
1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blocked. It means they can't transfer funds. Idk how people are interpreting this as seizing anything.

54
Schroeder09 54 points ago +55 / -1

I agree with this. There's been a huge uptick in the communist China infiltration talk. Tons of it. Even the leaked list of names of CCP influenced people in major corporations and in America that came out this morning. Huge uptick in the last week. I think this stuff is coming from the Trump administration and Trump allies. How he can weaponize it to prove this deal to the American people when nobody is on his side including the corrupt supreme court, I don't know. Hoping and praying though.

by mtgc
-2
Schroeder09 -2 points ago +3 / -5

All it does is let him put sanctions on interfering countries. What good does that do for 40 days? It's not like it allows him to enact martial law and sees all this stuff. I think people saying that "blocking assets"= seize are wrong.

0
Schroeder09 0 points ago +1 / -1

Toes at the eater's edge.... waiting for GEOTUS to command us... to cross.... THE RUBICON.

by Han9000
3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

Has anyone actually seen the frazzle drip video?

I heard 9/12 cops in NYC who supposedly saw it all "committed suicide."

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's my original list or repubs only. Couple bad addresses on it.

Here’s a link to a TDW with a google sheet of all battleground state republican House of Representatives and senate emails. Most have phone numbers too. You can copy and email all of em at once in seconds as opposed to jumping through a bunch of web pages for the emails to copy individually or by going through all the reps’ and senators’ web page contact forms. There are different sheets in the document for each fraud-ridden battleground state.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyUvpe/all-battleground-states-republic/

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't it say this was done 7-20-2020? And can you paste the text or list where you're seeing that the part that relates to vote certification?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Terrible how they wrote about this. You'd think it was from the times and not the post. "far right white nationalist group, the proud boys."

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

That? That's what we're supposed to see? What's the big deal with that aside from the fact that it's kinda gay.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›