1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn’t the Kelly case in Pennsylvania allege the same thing as the Texas case at the state legislature was cut out of the election change process? The main point of it was the emergency injunction due to this violation. Scotus has basically already stabbed us in the back and revealed themselves as globalist. I don’t know why people think there’s going to be a different outcome with the Texas case. The only thing left is the military option. I wonder if Biden gave them a deal. Maybe he said if you let the steel stand I won’t pack to court.

And yes, I know the actual case wasn’t dismissed but the emergency injunction was the main point for it. Overcoming the fact that all this fraud is certified is gonna be an obstacle for the public and for the Supreme Court which acts cowardly and afraid of its shadow “oh we don’t rule on original cases and we’re afraid to make people mad!!!”

That’s how they’re acted before this high profile case.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can actually see how some of these features are useful and needed. For example you might need to be able to check off a box if the machine doesn’t read it. Maybe there’s a box that was obviously filled out with pen, but somebody did it sloppily and only halfway. Then you would have to select it like she does in the video. But, if there is mountain tent these features could be used for bad. The same thing could be said with paper ballots. If somebody doesn’t fill in a ticket the adjudicator could.

However, being on a computer screen where you can quickly scroll through things does make the cheating easier. However, this would be called in an audit. This video doesn’t address anything algorithmic. That too though, could be call in an audit. It makes me even wonder if these things do what people are claiming and they’re that devious. I think the main source of fraud is the mail in ballots. That can’t be audited for authenticity. Especially if you don’t have signature verification on them. You can have some guy filling them out in his basement. Or in China like in that video we all saw!

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mi Republican reps' emails and numbers can all be found here. don't forget to call for abraham aiyash's removal too!** He's the terrorist who threatened monica palmer and the other Republican canvasser in wayne county and dox'ed them on love stream.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

Called yost twice. Yesterday and today. Anyone get any feedback of you've been calling too?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Called host yesterday and today. Yesterday the lady acted snarky. Today the last was nice but was working from home for the scamdemic and had no idea if this was being talked about in the office or not. She didn't indicate if the phone was ringing off the hook about this issue either( not that she said it wasn't though).

Where r the Ohio pedes?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. If these cock RINOs on the Supreme Court let them get away with this I bet Biden has given them a deal that he won’t Pack the supreme court if They just let him steal this.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Democrats' idiot response that basically said "yeah we broke the law but nobody else has done anything about it ever before and you shouldn't either."

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well why wouldn't they say that then? At the end of the day, anyone who thinks the Texas case encompasses the Pennsylvania one is completely 100% assuming. They could have offered that explanation. They arrogantly offered nothing.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here’s a link to a TDW with a google sheet of all battleground state republican House of Representatives and senate emails. Most have phone numbers too. You can copy and email all of em at once in seconds as opposed to jumping through a bunch of web pages for the emails to copy individually or by going through all the reps’ and senators’ web page contact forms. There are different sheets in the document for each fraud-ridden battleground state.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyUvpe/all-battleground-states-republic/

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where are the results coming out of the dominion machine analysis that was supposed to happen in it and trim county in Michigan two days ago? Jenna Ella said it would take 48 hours. That was yesterday morning.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they’re realists. Oreily is a cuck RINO imo. He jumped on e “it’s over” train 2 days after the election and I’m not exaggerating. 2-3 days when they were still fabricating ballots.

The other people are being realistic and making measures in this universe and reality. The Cracken was the case that was going to end at all. Lynn Woods case was the case that was going to end it all. Then eeevvvvvvverrryyyyone here said The ruling on the Pennsylvania Scotus case would show us how they would rule on the other Scotus cases that would reach them. Well they filled unfavorably for us and TDW talking point became “ this was expected. The real case is the Tx case.” Yeah, there are multiple posts on here yesterday when the News broke at the Pennsylvania case was for all intents and purposes kicked out. The emergency injunction it is what it really tried to gain, and that was dismissed. Furthermore, these people also started saying that the Texas case was where it was at when they had only known about the Texas case for two hours.

So which TDW members do you believe? pre-4 PM yesterday or post? These cucks you’re listening to probably are not reporting on the TX case because it’s gonna fail. Scotus didn’t even issue an explanation for their dismissal yesterday. No one on here has talked about how arrogant that in itself was. They didn’t even owe us an explanation. Not even so much of us, what about the plaintive? Kelly or whatever his name was. He was dismissed without reason why.

These scotus judges- apparently Thomas and Alito to my disbelief too- are cuck RINOs. They won’t save us. They’re saying the constitution doesn’t matter. The only thing left is the military option.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Insurrection???

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya I think so too. I'm gonna call on my way home again, but who knows how much difference any of this makes.

I hope others r considering running for office as much as I am after this debacle. We need these RINOs out. It's hard to threaten them with being primaried when they know by in large that no one will run against them, and what are you gonna do?vote for the Democrat crazy person?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

does this encourage you or the opposite? sounds like side-stepping to me. Is Yost gonna cuck out?

by Owl91
1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

good point. probably thrown out or lost

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

didnt this only happen in PA though? the other states just had violation of existing election law i thought? I guess GA had the consent decree. Is that the illegal election law change in GA? What about MI, WI, and AZ?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, i understand this. that's why i mentioned that part about there not really being anywhere else to go. They're gonna be the "awkward guy in the room" though when they have to hear cases and look at evidence. Cuck cowards afraid of public opinion and what people will think.

0
Schroeder09 0 points ago +1 / -1

this is thought to be the largest sticking point with the TX SCOTUS case. the supreme court is an appeals court. They're spineless cowards and don't take original cases even when the fate of the country and subsequent world is at stake as demonstrated by their dismissal without the decency of an explanation of the PA emergency injunction request. I believe SCOTUS will have to hear arguments and and look at evidence on thsi TX case. SInce they're spinless, cucc, cowards it's the biggest problem. However, there may be no other place to take this case, so I'm praying it works.

Based on their arrogant and unanimous (no explanation) dismissal of the PA emergency injunction I think they're gonna cuck out. The military option is all that's left, and who really believes that's gonna happen?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

ya the injunction was denied in pa

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

teh TX case was dismissed at SCOTUS?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

shouldn't forget abraham aiyash the representative elect that threatened the MI canvasser, Monica Palmer.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›