by Dride
2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

i gave them a call yesterday. the receptionist sounded happy until i said "this is his constituency now and we want him to do this." she made a comment that he was the first one on board with kentucky about this issue. I think she took it as a threat and mean comment. The kids were hollering in the background for me or I would have fought back. Gonna call again today because idk what she was talking about with Kentucky and she isn't gonna cock me off!

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep contacting AZ legislature.

Here’s a link to a TDW with a google sheet of all battleground state republican House of Representatives and senate emails. Most have phone numbers too. You can copy and email all of em at once in seconds as opposed to jumping through a bunch of web pages for the emails to copy individually or by going through all the reps’ and senators’ web page contact forms. There are different sheets in the document for each fraud-ridden battleground state.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyUvpe/all-battleground-states-republic/

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thanks for the clarification! This is somewhat settling although idk how to reconcile today's 9-0 decision. Can't singularly blame kavanaugh at 9-0 though.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +3 / -1

I understand that. Don't accuse me of not reading the article. The point is he even allowed something so corrupt. The post mark means nothing. Easily chested and made up.

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya. I know "doomers" right? I post about the dumb anti-doomers all the time. Stupidly optimistic. Heads in the sand avoiding looking at reality. We're winning! (While court cases are lost again and again)

Anyway, you're right. How will it go? Is it gonna be all military if this would ever happen? By the way I don't think it will. I think he'll leave peacefully and we'll be a fallen nation and stepping in to the start of the end times. I think it's what NEEDS to happen, but it just won't. Anyway, so is it gonna be our military rounding people up for military tribunal trials since all our courts are corrupt? He gets to pick the judge's in a military tribunal doesn't he?

Or does he get on this nation wide emergency broadcast Network, tell us all what's happening, round up a lot with the military, but also request patriots to help at certain locations?

Let's entertain the crazy Q talk because sadly I believe it's the only option left.

0
Schroeder09 0 points ago +2 / -2

Did u read the article I linked to? It's from before the election. He ruled with cuck roberts that NC could could ballots 9 days after election so long as they were post-marked by election day.

Now you expect him to go the other way? Some of the merits from the NC will implicitly if not explicitly be mentioned or considered in the TX case id think. Your logic would require that he'd change his mind from when he made this ruling.

I read a story s few months ago that there have been multiple times where it seemed kavanaugh was gonna rule with the conservatives, Roberts pulled him aside, and then he ruled with the cuck traitor roberts and the libs. I don't have an original link though.

-1
Schroeder09 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I've been telling people he's gonna sell us down the river and sl our the country. No hard evidence though. I forgot he stood there with this ruling already.

Military option is all that's left.

-65
Schroeder09 -65 points ago +10 / -75

When this fails and everyone here says, "it's ok pedes. We have XXX left."

What is xxx? I think we're down to the military option as of today.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

But he posted someone else's twitter so what do you have to actually say about the point?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do other states have to join Texas by the 10th at 10am then?

5
Schroeder09 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are a bunch of morons on here who think they’re helping the cause by down voting and shouting anyone down that discusses anything based in reality. If you aren’t saying “WE’RE WINNING PEDES!!!!!” while loss after loss rolls in in court “you’re a “doomer.” I call these morons the “anti-doomers.”

Someone must have thought someone you said was based in reality and it must not have been good for our movement.

-1
Schroeder09 -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's what I'm saying. I think we need to realize the military option is all that's left.

This very morning much less yesterday people were saying "we'll know more about how they're gonna rule on these cases coming up based off this PA one." Now it failed and it's,"We expected this. The TX lawsuit is IT!”

I just don't believe any of it anymore and the optimism on TDW has gone past "optimism" and is full on stupidity, head in the sand blindness.

0
Schroeder09 0 points ago +1 / -1

Can't anyone here be realistic? The certification does matter! Doesn't this bring PA out of contest and unable to be disputed? Ga is certified.

If nothing else this certification is something for the RINO legislatures to behind. Like the idiot ga judge you powell yesterday "there's no mechanism to undo the certification."

Whatever. They can do whatever they want and always do. Especially now. Repeal it on the grounds that it was false and fraudulent.

Realism is called "dooming" here! This decision good. It isn't ok!

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +7 / -4

You people are insane! You guys are all saying today that we would see how the supreme Court was going to be handling these cases based off how they ruled on this one. Now that they've ruled, you're saying we're going to get them in the next one in Texas!

I'm going to stop coming here because you guys have your head in the sand. Mark Levin's on the radio talking about how this is horrible and he's for storming the capital! this is not good. It's set precedent at the legislature can do whatever it wants and stomp all over the Constitution. Levin says they all ruled together. 9-0.

And as dirt TDW's opinion; do I listen to you guys now saying we're winning by losing? Our do I listen to you from earlier today where you said this was going to be a big indicator of where we're going?

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. Everyone acting like this is okay is a freaking retard. earlier today they were posts on here that said judging by how they ruled on this it would be indicative of what was to come. Now that they've ruled unfavorably the posts all say "this was expected. No big deal. We'll get them with the Texas case."

Stores are going to help. The only thing left is the military option. It's been that way since November 3rd.

How do we see who voted which direction? I have been thinking since this all started that kavanaugh is going to stab us in the back! Was it him!?

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya, this isn't good and not expected like dinner have said.

-2
Schroeder09 -2 points ago +2 / -4

No I'm saying they have to be laughing at him and thomas for being moral purists shooting themselves, the court, and the country in the foot to be able to say how pure and perfect they are.

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

I enter them ALL in the TO line.

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +8 / -6

Agreed. This is not ok. This is a set back. I appreciate the analysis in here but some honest realistic analysis would be appreciated too.

"We're ok."

What? They're gonna certify and then RINOs will hide behind that. It CERTAINLY 100% makes things hard by NOT giving the relief.

These liberal justices have to LOOOOOVE knowing how they're gonna rule as activists and the sucker moral purist conservatives will STILL rule the textual law to a T even when the WHOLE republic is at its knees. Couldn't they have made a different decision based on the fact that the vote and certification is based on fraud?

15
Schroeder09 15 points ago +15 / -0

And Don't give up on the Republican House of Representatives and senators either! I just read somewhere today that they were looking into ways to have a special session without the governor's calling it.

Here’s a link to a TDW with a google sheet of all battleground state republican House of Representatives and senate emails. Most have phone numbers too. You can copy and email all of em at once in seconds as opposed to jumping through a bunch of web pages for the emails to copy individually or by going through all the reps’ and senators’ web page contact forms. There are different sheets in the document for each fraud-ridden battleground state.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyUvpe/all-battleground-states-republic/

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›