I absolutely do answer polls. By artificially inflating democrat numbers.
They will tell you that, "We're all different" and yet we will retort "and yet you're all the same"; mutton dressed as lamb.
Power; and power alone is what each of these require, and, though yes, we'd be first to go. The others seem to be under some delusion that the remaining group(s) will not have one faction rise to the surface out of the desire for complete homogenous control, as has occurred time and time again in Leftist Political events.
If you're here, and you are actually open to some outside thought; what cause are you actually unanimously united for? You know, aside from having, literally anyone else, run the country provided it forwards your specific agenda, because that's what you're doing:
Most of you that want to defund the police don't give a single shit about whether the Trans get their 'rights', you don't care if those of historic slave stock get their reparations, because you're probably requesting this so whatever unscrupulous activity you have performed before can now occur without penalty, or to penalise someone for 'upholding a law which you perceive to be incorrect or petty'.
Most of you that want reparations don't care if guns are banned, and don't care if the Trans get their rights, because you can use the money/assets granted by reparations to spend it however you see fit. If that's a new car, an investment in business, charitable donation, or trivial spending, you don't care because you get to profit.
Most of you that want Trans rights do not care if guns are banned, and don't care if those of historic slave stock get their reparations. You get the rights you require which 'raise you up' and have a partly unquestionable status and unique position within society that has never been seen before. You get a level of 'benefit of the doubt' that is above that of the other groups.
Leftist world view, and it is innately communist thinking, predicates the mob mentality such that "First we focus on this issue, and then we'll get to my issue" never noting that, once those in the mob are satisfied that their issue has been met; who is going to support you? The Mensheviks aren't still alive and kicking.
Conservative (and centrist) world view suggests that traditional and natural are uniquely unalienable and that those promising the world, a utopia, are simply conmen; there is no magic water, there are no cure-alls. You get out what you put in, and to get a lot out, you need to have paid a lot in, be that in time, money, effort or ingenuity (or some amalgamation of all four).
If you sit there thinking that "These businesses haven't earned this; they have been profiting off of the back of the proletariat", query who came up with the idea; who patented the machinery, who disseminated that knowledge, who funded the construction, what projects arose as a result of the necessitated labour force? Then look at your career politicians; a job which is fundamentally predicated on a disagreement necessitating a solution. Do you not find it interesting that some of these people have been in this job for over 40 years and have made hundreds of millions of dollars. It is not in their interest to solve problems when it inherently makes them money.
I could sit here and say 'you've been lied to' but you'll dismiss me out of hand, as you likely may do anyway. But think critically just for one moment; if you have been fighting these issues (some of which) for over 60 years.
Take a look at your team; because your players haven't changed and yet you never get on the scoreboard. "Maybe this time" is a gamblers fallacy; the house always wins, and it's on your dime.
For me; the game changing move is President Trump; Every time.
Ham-Beast
Ham-Planet
Ham-Galaxy
Ham-Dromeda <- This one.
4 Legs Good, 2 Legs Baaaaaaad
I thought there was some sort of ultra life threatening virus running amock?
Didn't you know it's systemic; i just ignore every other statistic that would actually suggest that this is not the case.
Tragedy in Biden Land today as the man was Nuked from Orbit. Sources close to the Biden's say they're extremely upset about the violence prescribed by these words, and that if you aren't also upset, you aren't black.
I didn't know Kamala Harris was on the panel.
There is something extremely sexy about strong, disciplined, principled women.
If you don't find that mama bear tenacity sexy (or find it intimidating) spend more time around it; because that's one of the single best traits they can carry. On top of intellect and beauty too.
I've always been slightly disappointed with the ending of Law Abiding Citizen myself.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg has entered the chat.
I disliked the idea of a man (Dr Ivo "Eggman" Robotnik) with an IQ of 300 being played by Jim Carey.
But then the idea of a man with an IQ of 300 being beaten by a hedgehog immediately swung me right back on board and I reconsidered that Jim Carey is probably most suited to being a deranged lunatic of no real common sense.
Reasonable people interpret events in reasonable ways.
Unreasonable people interpret events in unreasonable ways.
Everyone knows the context with which Trump was highlighting Pelosi's statements, at the most reasonable level, it is a foolish position to advocate for large numbers of people in a confined space, when you're supposedly addressing something which spreads in these conditions.
Unreasonable people interpret this in exactly the way you iterated above with "It's technically untrue". If you have to fall back on a technicality you're being dictated to and don't want to admit it.
"Friendly reminder that one of the most important actions for a corrupt government to take is making the public distrust the media"
Sigh If there's one vapid moron there's thousands of vapid morons.
It is not an action of a corrupt government to make the public distrust the media, arguably it is irrespective of government such that the public should be critical of the media. There are two sides to the coin; maybe take a little bit of self-reflection and take a look at things and see that you are clearly not even attempting to play fair, and you wonder why people don't trust you. Note This is all incredulity, they don't care about the people that don't believe them, they just find them useful to keep the indoctrinated firmly under their spell by reinforcing that they are infact the smart ones. I mean, you only need to read that quote in the opposite ends of the spectrum
"Friendly reminder that one of the most important actions for a legitimate government to take is making the public [unquestioningly] trust the media"
and suddenly you start to see that both are fundamentally flawed approaches, but the former certainly is preferable to the latter; unless you think you'll be the farmer (when you're probably likely to be the cattle).
It is the sign of a corrupt government to outright censor ALL forms of media; either through direct propaganda through your owned outlets, or by destroying or restricting other outlets that would publish counter to the official line. Some might even imprison journalists or perform other similar action in order to contain the narrative.
The fact you're able to publish flagrant lies and disinformation live on air (and then publish a short retraction digitally), to extent that a number of networks almost worked the nation up in to a frenzy such that they called for death for a teenager who was simply smiling in the face of confrontation by grown men is but one part of proof that there is no integrity held within the mainstream media outlets.
Let us not forget the quashing by ABC of the Epstein story either.
Let us not forget the statistical analysis of the 2016 presidential election and the statistically improbable basis of a 90% Hillary victory (unless they knew something we didn't, like maybe some sort of 'security' by a previous administration, or maybe it really was only soft-balling questions to Hillary and no more cooperation than that).
Nothing these days makes me laugh more than the news reports (worldwide), the 'comedians', the talking heads and similar, and remembering a few familiar quotes:
"All propaganda has to be popular and has to accomodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach."
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."
Remind me what some of the biggest news stories have been?
Epstein Killed Himself (Doubtful)
Russia Collusion (No Evidence)
Ukraine Impeachment (Complete bollocks)
All but the Epstein debacle have been proved irrefutably untrue, and yet, how many times has it been repeated before any evidence was collected.
In all cases they sell lies; if my mother was a journalist I would not trust her to tell me the day I was born.
I'm afraid I can't see redacted; I can only see thedonald.win. No problem, sounds like a shit hole anyway; probably ran by a bunch of communists.
"Metaphorically slay his enemies."
Literal curses that slay her enemies are Hillary's playing field.
You're on a trip through the Impeachment Zone, you stop to ask Adam Schiff for direction, only to discover he has no reasons or something. Up ahead a door in the road, you swerve, narrowly avoiding "the scary door".
"This hurts me more than it hurts you", says the person wielding the bike lock.
"Errors"
If it's a 'bug' it wouldn't occur in one direction. Would be interesting to see if it was a one way street, because then thats malicious code.
Blonde haired, Blue eyed, 'European' style facial hair (you know what I mean).
Brownshirt anyone?
But didn't you hear on Reddit? We hate cops /s