"One Bad apple can spoil the bunch"
Of course, the best deterrent for Voter Fraud is to levy the most severe penalties for being found guilty of it; preferably before it gets to the stage we have currently arrived at.
But as a message for the future; this would be a sufficient deterrent.
DO NOT JUST TUNE IN FOR TUCKER.
If Tucker is the man we all think he is; he is prepared to fight this by leaving Fox if ALL ratings drop. If he is in it for the financial security; it suggests that it was all talk.
Allow him to make that decision. BUT TURN OFF FOX.
Again; Republicans with an ~1% difference between Republican President & Republican Senate.
Democrats with a substantially higher ~6.5% difference between Democrat Presidential Candidate & Democrat Senator.
If you're seeing numbers of higher than 2-3% variance; something is very badly wrong.
"Cope"
I mean, we've just mobilized the biggest Anti-Fraud movement the United States have ever seen, and it not only threatens to secure a second term Trump presidency, but it threatens to utterly annihilate any 'normie' Democrat support as they will become known as the Party that cheat in order to win.
It will then likely escalate into conflict; and to those that came here to simply say "Cope" (These smooth brains, I tell you.).
We're coping well thanks. How about you?
Traitors to the very end; and this time, there will be an end.
I hear Nascar has a Garage pull with his name on it.
Todd Howard; is that you?
"It's treason then."
"Seymour; Trump is winning the presidency!"
"No mother it's just being called for Biden."
I, and I believe many others here, couldn't live with myself if I was knowingly (or perhaps even unwittingly) a part of this.
Integrity; it is missing from many. I respect the hell out of the Democrats that have called out the Fraud; this is a bipartisan issue (or should be).
Let this be their death throes.
In some of these he also outperformed his own party representative by as many as 90000 votes (compared to not even 3000 for Trump).
In terms of discrepancy between President & Representative. Republicans have an ~1% discrepancy. Democrats have higher than 30% discrepancy.
~1% of Voters for Trump; did not support the Republic representative.
Over 30% of Voters for Biden; did not support the Democratic representative.
It's laughable.
I don't trust him; but I wouldn't refuse help from him either.
You have erroneously written "delivered" as "deported", you have also written "Gallows" as "Gitmo".
It's an easy mistake to make.
"Undercutting the process"
The gallows are too good for you.
Queen pawn takes Knight; Discover Check.
There is no alternative punishment available for those guilty of treason.
They're not only immediately disqualified, they're also then fined (punished) and then banned from competing for a period of time, or permanently.
Another extremely astute observation; and not an uncommon one but providing new insight regardless (tl;dr at the bottom):
"Cult of Opinion" - This is the phrase that essentially describes most people in the world; immaterial of the degree of education in many cases. The phrase essentially means to parrot popular phrasing and messages that are currently accepted by 51% such that it will result in confirmation from a majority reaffirming your opinions.
Most of us will probably just be familiar with an 'Echo Chamber'. Cult of Opinion does not require knowledge; it requires memory. If you are capable of regurgitating a popular message, you will acquire affirmation from the majority that support this message, regardless of whether you actually understand the message, its implications, feasibility, and logic behind it.
"Trump said to 'Grab them by the Pussy'"
"Yeah he's such a creep isn't he"
"I can't believe someone would say such a thing"
Sound familiar; no one is saying: "Well what was the context of it?"
Religion Many on here will say "I think belief in God is what is missing", and I don't entirely disagree; I am more concerned in believing of a dire consequence, than I am of believing in paradise - not to say I don't profoundly and positively think of this.
I act not because I consider how this will carry favor.
I act because I consider how inaction will carry disfavor.
The move away from God has caused some problems; and I don't criticize Atheism for its skepticism: I'm not concerned for an ultimate proof of an existence, because it changes nothing.
I either die; and I'm in a hole in the ground (or burned, that's not for me personally), but I have no consciousness to know that is the case if I consider the atheistic and base human logic understanding.
Or I die, and am then judged based on the life I have lived, and either suffer eternally, or enjoy paradise (perhaps paradise after death is such that there is no knowledge of death, think of a lucid state, or perhaps think of where you have cases of Deja-vu, sometimes I find myself thinking that perhaps this is what is meant; perhaps it is that intangible, indiscernible feeling that perhaps there is something else 'Is this me?')
I am the type of person that would accept the atheist argument; of perhaps there is nothingness. But I also accept that, well even if that is the case I would rather have a healthy fear of unpleasantness that we feel in life, existing for all time, in an intense and unending fashion.
To me it is personal. I can hope; But ultimately everyone's decisions are ultimately their own. Some may have devils in their ears, but they're the ones to listen.
Wisdom over Knowledge
This I think is something where i think our side is also in part to blame; I think in many cases we have chosen knowledge (The understanding of a subject) without considering implementation, reasoning for acquisition and actually reflecting upon how we should pass this knowledge forward - and most importantly how to deal with those resistant to this knowledge.
I think we, in the past, have made errors in the past by putting out knowledge to those that, if we were honest, we knew weren't prepared to hear it. We should have had the wisdom to find a way to lead them to this knowledge themselves, and support them when they acknowledge they wish to learn. Forcing a knowledge suppository into anyone has them remain steadfast to what they originally believed to be true; you can't present even objective truths to someone that does not consider life to be an objective reality. Wisdom is the foresight to be able to frame something, when arguing in good faith, or with those that genuinely don't know, knowledge that they are most likely to grasp and how we have come this far. And wisdom is knowing when your knowledge is for those that are listening in on an argument, and not necessarily who you are arguing with.
That's not to say you don't have Big Tech and Media making life more difficult; but this is the culmination of many years of slow erosion, it certainly was not just the last 10 years that this has suddenly sprung up from; this has been a long time coming.
The parental element; "I discipline you because I love you" has also been eroded which has only further exacerbated the ability to pass on knowledge; there is some knowledge in life that are gender based lessons, and are better served from one than another.
Learning respect for women, for example, is best served from a Father; that's not because you cannot learn it from Women, because you can, but I believe the subtext is different:
If you are a mother; you have raised your son. You will have raised him to respect women (probably on a subconscious level as a need for procreation) but because for a society to function they are just as equal to men. However; you may be particularly short and petite, and your son may be significantly taller, and heavier. Your son will likely respect you out of gratitude for raising him and providing for him; that doesn't mean that will necessarily translate to other women - especially if you begin to mix in feelings of betrayal; etc etc. If he 'owes other women nothing' you might find your lesson of respect has been misplaced; and he views women as requiring respect out of their ability to care.
If you are a Father; you have raised your son. You will have raised him to respect women (probably on a subconscious level as a need for procreation) but also on an overt level that they are necessary for procreation, AND that for a society to function they are necessary and just as equal to men, filling in different roles; and that OTHER MEN will defend 'their females' quite aggressively, especially against other males, and in an especially aggressive fashion against other males that mistreat them. Your father is probably close to your height, and for a significantly longer portion of your life (as a young man), poses a consistent 'threat' (of physical discipline) in comparison to your mother who probably does not keep that level of 'threat' for the same periods of time. You will respect them, out of that innate sense of judgement, because the threat presently exists in addition to the reasons your mother has probably espoused.
You will be inclined to gravitate towards respect out of judgement, because this is a base value, 'even if they wrong you, it is your place to walk away'. You can defend yourself, but it is your responsibility to walk away. If that base value does not exist, the threat does not appear present, the incentive to walk away is lower.
Alternatively think raising the child at early stages, there is no substitute for a mother; as Men, we're often quite tactile and excitable individuals, with often an air of impatience, which can manifest as frustration for others (as it can in politics), a Mother knows that some things are matters of time; and know the speed at which their child is capable of grasping things.
There are some lessons which are better delivered by one, than another.
Cult of Opinion. Loss of 'Faith' and the lessons affirmed by it. Loss of 'Family group' and the lessons enforced by it.
These three factors are what cause fragmentation in society. You can be irreligious, it's as I say; I'm more than willing to accept their argument that there may well be nothing. But I'm not going to say you're wrong for thinking that, and I don't expect them to tell me I'm wrong for putting my trust elsewhere. Likewise I will stand-by that there are some lessons that are better delivered in different ways; that currently we simply do not do.
Unprecedented times as they say. (The following will not be as succinct). Do I think we have any prayer of neutralizing the hydra?
That depends on where we as a collective are prepared to stop. From the outset the opposition has framed us as uneducated, 'racist' and cult-like; they have framed us in such a way that we can be viewed as less than human. Either in need of re-education (which they know we will not accept), or some other 'solution'. They have framed Trump's administration, and us as supporters, as innately being unwilling to accept any result that would require Trump to peacefully hand over the office of President, they'll never say anything about our reasons.
Do we present the risk of becoming persona non grata, as we are the last remaining threat to the 'Establishments' seizure of power by any means necessary; and from Trumps announcement of his intention to run for President, it should be clear to see that it truly was "by any means necessary".
I'm not a 'Doomer'; nor is this a 'Black Pill' - this isn't a message to say "Bend over and take it". This message just outlines exactly why the fight on our hands is monumental.
We are already in the process of exhausting all righteous and just options available to us; and I pray that these processes reveal the truth, and result in a righteous victory for President Trump. However; if they do not reveal the truth (and I mean that as the truth is absolute) and there are no sufficient explanations, then there are those of us here which will say:
"I'm out; we'll plan for 2024"
For others, what began at the ballot box, will end at the ammo box, and I'm not here to talk down to anyone that feels that the sentiment is a LARP, or that they are equally treasonous. Sometimes people need that personal element to fully invest themselves for the cause.
I truly hope this particular battle ends at the Ballot box, or the Jury Box.
BUT WHAT IF WE WIN!
I will always end on a high; because what we're feeling now is a sharp bend in the track as a train with no brakes! The Train will rock; the carriages will shake, but it's because we have never taken this track at speeds like this before.
My actual answer for "What can be done"/"Do we have any prayer of neutralizing the hydra" is that yes; but there will have to be a heavy amount of sacrifices made knowing that we will possibly never get a President like President Trump again - and that in many ways could be used to an advantage for a Fist Fight of a Second Term Presidency.
And it would need to be a bloody fist fight.
Actions speak louder than words as they say; and the time for sternly worded letters and complaints had long passed. Action against all factions would be necessary (in ways i briefly illustrated before).
Assume we do win; if we unchain Trump - we would need a candidate for 2024 who looked more moderate than Trump to begin to undo the damage caused over the last 30-50 years of the slowly drifting value systems. Think about an Olive branch, that might be unpalatable, but there would need to be 'something' that can be viewed as significant, whilst not dealing substantial long term damage.
Assuming that we win; we MUST assume that we lose 2024; The Establishment (and depending on the aggression in tackling the Hydra, potentially some current Trump voters) will heavily push away from any even slightly conservative leaning figure; hence the above idea of someone that fits the build for someone that could be the starting point for a healing process.
We would have to continue our fight knowing that killing the Hydra will be slow going; and the way to strike all blows at once, is to slowly poison its primary water source. As much as their tactics are conniving and under-handed, they have worked for so long because they are under-handed; they have invested so much time to ensure they had control. That they could leverage what they need to leverage.
These tactics may be a necessary adoption. We either fight in the light of day; come what may - and win or lose it all. Or we fight in the darkness waiting for the time when it is us that hold all the cards.
Keep hope in your hearts fellow patriots! There are battles being fought across the country; we can't let the man down. Get in contact with each other; check how we're doing. Have a friendly chat. Keep morale high; it takes more than one fight to win a war; it takes more than a single loss to lose a war!
610 fields to be precise.
The Hydra exists; it's not necessarily 'people' (It is but you'll understand my point shortly) but it is the mechanisms that allow groups of people to manipulate. You have a Hydra with at least 6 heads:
Big Tech - Controlling 'Free' Information available to the Public, and capable of deplatforming its enemies.
Media - Controlling the movement of information, and providing a focused, single-minded narrative among ALL Corporate Media entities (including foreign media entities, E.g. BBC, ITV, etc).
Education - Enforcing the learning of Information, weakening critical thinking skills, and the ability to question an established narrative (Revisionist History).
Political - An opposition (with a known propensity for fraud [Illegals, Dead Voting, etc]) that insists upon itself, with the major support of the 3 institutions above WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
Legal/Law Enforcement - A Legislative and Enforcement body that intentionally refuses to pursue crimes [and High Crimes at that], whilst pursuing low level crimes that, will in all likelihood, be overturned.
Financial - They're (Media/Eduction etc) getting their money from somewhere because they have been hemorrhaging money with their insistent 'woke culture' seeping into all facets of these institutions and driving people away in large numbers. The money they're finding to bail out felons, rioters. Etc.
The issue is of course; you would have to strike 6 simultaneous blows to all 6 institutions to sufficiently neutralise the threat that is posed. The people are an after-thought; because the systems themselves are so rotten, that any major work may cause the entire thing to collapse into itself. Striking Media & Big Tech would deal the most significant blow; namely acting as a distraction by overburdening them (I.e. Forcing them to report on themselves) whilst you tackle the remaining 4 heads. The Top two; are the most outwardly damaging; the latter 4 are the ones that are most entrenched and would simply cause the same problem to arise 5, 10, 20, 50 years later if not sufficiently dealt with, but you simply cannot target those 4 institutions whilst Big Tech & Media are capable of framing this in whatever they desire. You kill the Media and Big Tech by overburdening them whilst tackling the other 4; making it seem like Big Tech and the Media are the primary targets, Section 230 reform (intentionally stalled). With this in place; you can tackle the remaining four with firings (because in terms of financial/political/legislative, it now looks like the Media/Big tech has a vested interest because they are being investigated).
Presently of course, we have bigger problems. But the Hydra has at least 6 heads.
The penalty for both should be the same.
Cut it all out; that includes Tucker (but is not because of Tucker).
Hit them where it hurts; anyone wise enough to see the writing on the wall will leave and understand what the viewer was desiring.
Globalists my friend.
Same the world over; BBC, ITV, CNN, AP, ABC, NBC, CNNBC, etc etc.