WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

By also keeping them as far away from these pedophiles as possible.

They weren't concerned with Kavanaghs Schedules; I won't be concerned with theirs.

It is used to show that word that has been used incorrectly, or otherwise is a typing error.

Hi JonnyB?

This is Unhinged Door Solutions. We're sorry we missed you earlier today.

We arrived to fit the 5th Door to your Property but after knocking on the previous 4 we assumed that you were out.

If you would like to call us I have left a calling card with you, and our office hours are 9-5 and we can reschedule the fitting of this additional door for your property.

Warmest Regards

Unhinged.

Out of a Global Population of ~7.8 Billion (7,800,000,000). "The World Health Organization said that its "best estimates" suggest one in 10 people worldwide may have been infected by the coronavirus. The figure represents more than 20 times the number of confirmed cases, which currently stands at more than 35 million."

Let's do some basic mathematics. 35,000,000 * 20 = 700,000,000 (700 million) Of that 700 million, let us grossly inflate their number and say 2 million have died (we know this to be false).

2000000 / 700,000,000 = 0.0028... * 100 = 0.28%, but lets call it 0.3% And the irony of it all; this is actually erring in Covid-19's death rate favor.

"Oh but it's not as simple as you suggest, as Covid-19 could spread exponentially"

And yet it is the mortality rate which is the thing to actually be concerned about; which is almost never reported, and when it is reported, tends to use grossly over-inflated figures where "Covid-19 is mentioned". The sad truth is there are some out there that would die from a faint breeze; it's not a happy truth, but the reality is there are some where this virus could have been anything and they still would have probably died.

It should be noted therefore that, let us say that There would be 300 deaths per 100000 (one hundred thousand). 0.3%

Influenza sits at 0.1% CFR with an Infectivity rate (IFR) of 0.025 - 0.04%. WuFlu has preliminary estimates at 0.82 - 9.64% (CFR) with IFR of 0.12 - 1.08% Their argument is that this is supposed to be 5 to 12 times more deadly than Influenza (yet the statistics above show this at 8 to 90 times as deadly - the sheer scope of variance doesn't fill a statistician with hope); plainly, it isn't significantly more deadly; it can be considered to be 'more deadly' but to claim it at a significant rate is disingenuous and there are similar problems with the infectivity rates given the World Health Organizations own statement causes them problems. It is somewhat passable that it is more infectious than Influenza (I could get into it but I'd argue around 4 times more infectious than seasonal Flu could at least be considered passable though i'd argue this would be the highest estimate).

What is concerning is how they are even close to considering that it is up to 12 times as deadly as Influenza. For reference, that would mean that if you had 1000 people in a room, all infected with influenza, odds are 1 person would die (0.1%). Let's therefore say there were 700,000,000 all infected with Influenza; odds are 700,000 would die (0.1%).

We must now look at the Deaths we SHOULD be seeing if their estimations are even slightly plausible. 12 times more deadly means 0.1 * 12 = 1.2% (700,000,000 / 1000)*12 = 8,400,000

For reference, that would suggest that we should be sitting at Eight Million Four Hundred Thousand deaths; (we're currently just over 1 million).

5 times more deadly means 0.1 * 5 = 0.5% (700,000,000 / 1000)*5 = 3,500,000

For reference, that would suggest if it was five times more deadly than Influenza, we should have expected to see three million five hundred thousand deaths; (we're currently just over 1 million).

Again; I cannot overstate that, in direct comparison to influenza, Covid-19 is anywhere from maybe twice to four times as deadly as Influenza, and in both cases, you're looking at statistics of about 1-4 in every 1000.

That's the problem when you keep lying (whether it's intentional or otherwise). You forget which lies you have told, and eventually you just have to move the frame of reference to something else. This is without even comparing the fact that this is without breaking it down to affected groups and other additional factors. This is just basic mathematics of "How many deaths are we prepared to call a problem", because apparently 0.5% is too high.

Call me heartless (and it's fine, because I'm prepared in the cases where it's me that it is called on), but even if i were to say 5 in every 1000 people and even if I knew all 5; it is simply outrageous that there are those that will consider complete lock-downs, curfew are the responsible measures to take, rather than trying to find a means to protect those 5 people, as opposed to telling all 1000 that it's their responsibility to make sure that those 5 people do not die.

She strikes me as the kind of person that would own a rubber suit; but probably not for the above purpose.

bUt 210,000 pEoPlE hAvE dIeD! Over 1 Million globally

...

Out of a Global Population of ~7.8 Trillion (7,800,000,000). "The World Health Organization said Monday that its "best estimates" suggest one in 10 people worldwide may have been infected by the coronavirus. The figure represents more than 20 times the number of confirmed cases, which currently stands at more than 35 million."

Let's do some basic mathematics. 35,000,000 * 20 = 700,000,000 (700 million) Of that 700 million, let us grossly inflate their number and say 2 million have died.

2000000 / 700,000,000 = 0.0028... * 100 = 0.28%, but lets call it 0.3% And the irony of it all; this is actually erring in Covid-19's death rate favor.

"Oh but it's not as simple as you suggest, as Covid-19 could spread exponentially"

And yet it is the mortality rate which is the thing to actually be concerned about; which is almost never reported, and when it is reported, tends to use grossly over-inflated figures where "Covid-19 is mentioned". The sad truth is there are some out there that would die from a faint breeze; it's not a happy truth, but the reality is there are some where this virus could have been anything and they still would have probably died.

It should be noted therefore that, let us say that There would be 300 deaths per 100000 (one hundred thousand). 0.3%

Influenza sits at 0.1% CFR with an Infectivity rate (IFR) of 0.025 - 0.04%. WuFlu has preliminary estimates at 0.82 - 9.64% (CFR) with IFR of 0.12 - 1.08% Their argument is that this is supposed to be 5 to 12 times more deadly than Influenza (yet the statistics above show this at 8 to 90 times as deadly - the sheer scope of variance doesn't fill a statistician with hope); plainly, it isn't significantly more deadly; it can be considered to be 'more deadly' but to claim it at a significant rate is disingenuous and there are similar problems with the infectivity rates given the World Health Organizations own statement causes them problems. It is somewhat passable that it is more infectious than Influenza (I could get into it but I'd argue around 4 times more infectious than seasonal Flu could at least be considered passable though i'd argue this would be the highest estimate).

What is concerning is how they are even close to considering that it is up to 12 times as deadly as Influenza. For reference, that would mean that if you had 1000 people in a room, all infected with influenza, odds are 1 person would die (0.1%). Let's therefore say there were 700,000,000 all infected with Influenza; odds are 700,000 would die (0.1%).

We must now look at the Deaths we SHOULD be seeing if their estimations are even slightly plausible. 12 times more deadly means 0.1 * 12 = 1.2% (700,000,000 / 1000)*12 = 8,400,000

For reference, that would suggest that we should be sitting at Eight Million Four Hundred Thousand deaths; (we're currently just over 1 million).

5 times more deadly means 0.1 * 5 = 0.5% (700,000,000 / 1000)*5 = 3,500,000

For reference, that would suggest if it was five times more deadly than Influenza, we should have expected to see three million five hundred thousand deaths; (we're currently just over 1 million).

Again; I cannot overstate that, in direct comparrison to influenza, Covid-19 is anywhere from twice to four times as deadly as Influenza, and in both cases, you're looking at statistics of about 1-4 in every 1000.

That's the problem when you keep lying (whether it's intentional or otherwise). You forget which lies you have told, and eventually you just have to move the frame of reference to something else. This is without even comparing the fact that this is without breaking it down to affected groups and other additional factors. This is just basic mathematics of "How many deaths are we prepared to call a problem", because apparently 0.5% is too high.

Call me heartless (and it's fine, because i'm prepared in the cases where it's me that it is called on), but even if i were to say 5 in every 1000 people and even if I knew all 5; it is simply outrageous that there are those that will consider complete lockdowns, curfew are the responsible measures to take, rather than trying to find a means to protect those 5 people, as opposed to telling all 1000 that it's their responsibility to make sure that those 5 people do not die.

There is a justification for punishing someone for 'lack of knowledge', 'lack of foresight', 'incompetence' or some measure of the above depending on the ranking.

Let me put it to you this way: If you hire a new employee to stack shelves at your multi-billion dollar shop. Said employee has had some prior experience but no formal training, he is unfamiliar with the stock counting system, and as such results in mis-ordering a much higher quantity of stock which cannot be held in storage. Said mistake costs the company money, but it is difficult to blame the employee due to a previous failing by the company for failing to provide sufficient training that could have averted the issue. If subsequent training was provided then it could be argued that this would count as a mark on his record, because it was his mistake.

If you have been in high levels of government, like, let's say First Lady of the United States, and have held numerous high-ranking positions, and are otherwise respected to have a great deal of competency in the legal profession for instance. Or perhaps a director of intelligence, or maybe even a senior member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, it isn't quite so reasonable that you aren't aware of how to sufficiently store data, how data is transferred, and the types of device and tools used to 'Wipe' said data.

There are two options:

1. Gross incompetency such that they were hired into a position they were never capable of doing - as such, the very act of which could be argued to be criminal - but at the very least means they should have all access and privileges revoked due to the present danger they represent.

2. They're playing dumb because the rules allow them to play dumb because the deck of cards they're playing with is loaded with aces whilst ours still contain the joker. Because option 1 above sure as hell does not apply with Government at the highest level (at present) - which essentially shows they have intentionally 'looked the other way' (Netflix) or intentionally interfered (above) and are just waiting for it all to blow over.

At high levels, complicity is malicious. Never take it at face value; there's too much at stake for it to be a 'chance mistake' as often as these occur.

Either way, anyone else who WAS involved needs speedy trial, death penalty.

I remember when I invited you and your family to my BBQ and fed you.

I remember when I asked that courier to move up so he didn't block your drive.

I remember giving you the footage when my security camera caught the man who struck your car and ran.

God knows me without question, and I accept that judgement as absolute. Your judgement however; weak and infantile, it is not worth the paper it's written on - that you couldn't have the decency to tell it to me face-to-face. Anonymously written, Anonymously delivered, decrying that it is I, who is too small and dirty to be forgiven by yourself, but apparently worthy of being absolved by the grace of god. Let it be known to all that once, I will forgive them. But I will never forget.

Do not foul his name and speak of his tolerance and mercy to a kind man.

Leftists and Covid-19 a brief history, and the Blackpill:

Prior to the Wuflu: Heh; this planet is long overdue for some form of apocalypse to reduce the planets population. Look at all these gammon/white-supremacist/racist/etc (predominantly aimed at the 50+ demographic).

Wuflu begins affecting non-American/Western European nations: "They won't need to shut anything down; we can still run as normal - why should we need to shut borders with other countries?"

Wuflu affects their Country: "Why didn't we shut it all down? What sort of incompetence is this?"

Wuflu transpires to adversely affect those with underlying medical conditions, particularly those affecting the lungs, but is otherwise anywhere from indistinguishable from a common-cold, to a relatively comparative form of Influenza: "We must keep the country shut down so that we can protect our elderly"

Wuflu is or is not stopped by masks, no one is really certain, but everyone else is saying that is so therefore, wear your mask; because remember, the mask isn't to stop you from catching it, it's to stop you spreading it if you have it (no seriously some of this was the logic). "Where is your mask?!"

Wuflu and the shut-downs (for which they advocated) prevents a large number of them from working (particularly apparent in European countries for reference): "Please supplement our income, even though we aren't actually working"

1. This is actually a solution.

2. This would never be considered a solution, it's just not our problem.

3. Of course it's our problem what did you expect to happen?

4. It's our problem and it's our problem because it doesn't affect us directly, but it affects maybe someone we know... maybe.

5. It's actually your problem too because you're responsible for my health and well being and we will force you to accommodate my needs.

6. Not only is this your problem, but finding a means to feed us (whilst feeding yourself) is also your problem, despite the fact you may be the only one working, and we'll have you arrested if you don't play the game by our rules.

7. Hah, Now that Trump has Covid-19, he'll see how bad it is, we hope he dies, but we just won't say that, we'll just skirt around it as if no one can tell that's what we're thinking so we can claim superiority.

8. What do you mean Trump has left Hospital and it wasn't that serious? He can't do that, he's putting lives at risk!

9. He's clearly still delusional and hopped up on medication and steroids no one else gets and is completely insane and dangerous, just like he's always been. He's just rallying his base that believes its a hoax.

2 (and everything subsequent) directly opposes 1

3&4 directly opposes 2 (see Pelosi China town statements, Trump travel bans)

5 implies it's everyone else's 'collective responsibility', as opposed to 3 and 4 which would insist upon Personal responsibility.

6 is just more hypocrisy; I assume everyone is familiar with the saying Die on your feet, or live on your knees. These are those kneeling.

7 directly opposes 4 (that the left is doing this out of a care for everyone) and directly opposes a number of other statistics regarding lethality (among others).

8 directly opposes 7 in that even a 70 year old, in a high-stress work environment (and a reasonably unhealthy lifestyle - by the lefts own standards) can't contract a severe strain of China Virus and die from it.

9 directly opposes 3; under pretense that if there is a 'cure' and it's being hidden from you, it could only be argued that it would be the left 'hiding it' as all medical professionals speaking out against the narrative have summarily been de-platformed; this either means one of two things: They were right, and the left couldn't stomach a cheap, effective cure/treatment. They were wrong, but there isn't a cure and your argument is fundamentally flawed because your own officials would state it. No one is saying that the virus does not exist. Those in this base are saying that almost all of the evidence surrounding this virus has been heavily tampered with, such that other professionals are willing to put their careers on the line to speak out against it, and for all of those afraid of the virus, you can't get it to kill an 'unfit, unhealthy, obese, 70 year old'.

Face it; these people have always been at war with eastasia.

You can't convince these people; the issue then becomes, well what happens after the election. You have those that won't accept defeat; because they will insist that it was the opposition that did the cheating (whilst said opposition makes attempts to secure an election) whilst proclaiming that if said opposition loses the election, they also will not accept the election; because they don't like what the people decided, and because the Trump administration has mislead them and convinced them that the election would be unfair. No matter what the outcome is; they have already decided what their reaction is; these are not reasonable people.

This is not just subject to Covid-19; this is subject to every facet of your life; because if they won't die on their feet, they will insist you join them on your knees, or quite literally die on your feet.

This is the blackpill.

There is no convincing; because they are not capable of being convinced. Everyone that disagrees is a liar. There is no truth but their truth.

What options are available in the wake of this; because the reality is, November 3rd is the event horizon; what happens after?

Why not leverage the idea that they agree fundamentally with the destruction. The fact they have been caught bailing them out.

Is White Supremacy even an Idea; really?

Is it though?

What is essentially being predicated with the statement of "White Supremacy" is that those of predominantly Western European Heritage wish to create uniform hegemony over all others that could even in part be considered 'non-white' all that this requires is ignoring all of the other political conflicts between these groups such that there is actually very little unification with a number of clear factions clearly existing on every level. What this predicates itself upon is that it enshrines that the powerful cannot ascertain the exact agreements that each individual nation should craft with each other (unless it is China of course, in which case allow them to build your infrastructure, and buy up the existing) but they are all in complete unilateral agreement that one thing that will always resist and oppose all legislature (and similar) from anyone non-white, no matter about the credibility of the Idea.

All you have to do is ignore: Around 1000 years of European History. Nationalism and the unification and break-up of large portions of Europe. History of Empire; be that Roman, Britannic, or others. and the very founding principles of the Establishment of the United States of America and the republic.

The idea that "White Supremacy" is an idea that is prevalent; let alone that it is rising and dangerous is utterly nonsensical - to even consider there to be any truth that it is rising is disingenuous and intentionally malicious (levied by politicians and the media). Patriotism however, that is rising - something I hope to see paying dividends come November 3rd.

I see as of that screenshot the ministry of truth has not decided that all he speaks are lies.

Honestly though I imagine they just "didn't feel like work today".

"Hello my name is Hank Americanman and I will be your tech support today."

That sounds awfully inefficient for something Rope, Gravity and a sufficient drop will do for a dime on the dollar.

Look into the History of Isabel Wilkerson and her work (including the endorsements, and its historiographical research) and its flimsy foundations especially to make rather leaping comparisons to Nazi Germany and India, in terms of Caste system when looking at America.

No seriously, she actively makes comparrisons for a caste system in America existing as akin to those that arose in Nazi Germany, and India.

No mother it's just a peaceful protest.

Yes; it's a European dialect.

"Quick Trial. Death Penalty."

Rot in Hell

But it wouldn't have been indelible in the hippocampus!

Twitter: This post advocates violence

It's not often; but on occasion, I've worked about 60 hours solidly (just on an occasional break, and to eat).

The amount of hours that this man puts in for all of us is astounding, and (even aside from the office itself) is deserving of the utmost respect.

I'd settle on Rammstein's Zerstören, but there are a number of others that would work sufficiently.

Part of me is pleased that it ends on a high note.

Another part of me is immeasurably disappointed it doesn't bring up Benghazi as proof of the Democrat's (and SoB's) Hatred. What's that saying about projection again...