5
Shalomtoyou 5 points ago +5 / -0

My lesson would be never to trust black people. Is that the lesson he wanted to teach her?

3
Shalomtoyou 3 points ago +3 / -0

Naw, I was red pilled after 9/11. I saw the leftists on my campus blame 9/11 on the Jews and I was like: "What the hell?"

Being a transvestite never was the source of my politics. I knew from day one that I was surrounded by crazies. Some were nice crazies. And I certainly had a lot of fun. And let's be honest, it was easier to get laid and dates.

But my Judaism made me red pill way more than the dressing did.

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just give me a bowling bowl and I'll knock them all down at once. Strike!

4
Shalomtoyou 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, there's many deceptions in the doctrine, just as there are in transgenderism.

You have the Psychologists in present day who can't honestly study the phenomenon because of the social implications.

You have the Psychologists who studied it 50 years ago when you still could do some serious study of the condition.

And you have the activists that pick and choose which study that is most flattering, and really wants push in the halls of power to get legal goodies for themselves. And come up with a narrative story that best advances their cause but is basically propaganda.

And behind them, you might have them getting money from Communists who see the whole movement as useful for destabilizing a target nation.

2
Shalomtoyou 2 points ago +3 / -1

And that's the problem with group justice.

Did some women do that to some men? Sure.

Did THIS girl do that to anybody? I don't think so.

So why the hell should she be punished? For being born into a group that has some bad apples?

That'll start the wrong kind of Civil War.

4
Shalomtoyou 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of Shylock's lines in Shakespeare's play, "The Merchant of Venice."

"You take my house when you take that which supports my house. You take my life when you take the means by which I live.'

2
Shalomtoyou 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember when Eharmony was ONLY male-female relationships, because the authors understood those best and may have been religious. Their claim was that they had no idea how to match same sex couples.

They got sued and had to let in the same sex couples.

Not sure what happened since.

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

My understanding that the Greek homosexuality was usually grown men with boys. Maybe teens or younger. Pederasty.

They would have found the idea of two grown men in a relationship to be weird.

Is my understanding wrong?

6
Shalomtoyou 6 points ago +7 / -1

After our second daughter was born, was so busy and tired with the two kids. And maybe getting older, a lot of my sex drive went away too. Which sucks. But so did the urge to dress. And having children was tremendously reinforcing to my masculinity. Our culture doesn't value men or fathers. I found the value in the experience.

6
Shalomtoyou 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah, back when I was in the scene... I called myself a transvestite. I liked "she" but I didn't go ape crazy if someone got it wrong. I once shared a taxi to go to a party with some drag queens. They called each other "he". Even though they wore ten times as much makeup as I did. I liked the "girl next door" look. They liked the.... well, you've seen drag queens. They look like clowns, or the "lady face" the way minstrel vaudeville once did black face.

My guess is that gay men probably are most attracted to straight men. I always wondered, for instance... you've seen some gay men with the ... bit of a lisp in the talk, the higher voices? I always wonder if this is something they could or could not control... like when I go to synagogue and somehow my speech sounds a little more like a Brooklyn Jew even though I'm from California. It's weird.... but maybe they feel more aroused by a man who doesn't have those traits, and too many of their fellow gay men do?

My guess on who's attracted to trans people is almost a separate sexual orientation. Or someone who's bi enough to find it interesting to mix... though many don't. But what do I know, I've been married for a bit now and have been out of the dating pool for a while.

0
Shalomtoyou 0 points ago +1 / -1

D A M N.....

16
Shalomtoyou 16 points ago +17 / -1

Well, my guess on that is two-fold... especially since I used to be a crossdresser myself. (Kinda gave it up a few years ago).

The reasons for that are this:

  1. You got to use a LOT of makeup to conceal the male face.

  2. Many "trans women" are motivated by sexuality. Autogynphelia is the best theory I found to explain my experience. The use of women's trappings and wardrobe is an arousal, a high. The pain of not doing it was the pain of avoiding a sexual fetish. So they enjoy putting on the makeup -- literally.

I remember a black jack dealer back in Vegas.... young girl. She was complaining that her boss made her wear lip gloss and she hated the feeling of it on her lips. I promise you, that's something no trans person would complain about -- they adore that feeling. It's part of the thrill.

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's a reason it's "Karen" not "Kevin."

40
Shalomtoyou 40 points ago +42 / -2

Yeah, I heard interviews of fashion models who quit because they were starving themselves for jobs. Why? Because the guys giving the jobs were gay men and wanted them to look like what gay men wanted: Skinny boys.

And the funny thing is, straight men don't WANT the skinny boy look. They LIKE curves!

60
Shalomtoyou 60 points ago +61 / -1

Twenty years ago I met a crossdresser who told me ....she? he? Whatever....

Anyway.... this crossdresser did lingerie commercials. Shaved legs, put on the stockings, pictures, got money and product as payment.

When I asked: "But you're a guy and its your legs in the stockings in women's ad magazines?"

I was told: "ALL the models in those magazines are men."

"So women who are starving themselves to get their legs to look like the models... are comparing themselves to men? Men who just shave their legs to look feminine?"

"Yes."

Now it's out in the open....

9
Shalomtoyou 9 points ago +12 / -3

Yeah.

You know what irritates the hell out of me? Her overnight rocket to the top of people's consciousness. When all she was was a teenage woke scold.

I tried for years to be an author. Am I a great writer? Well, I think I'm pretty good. Not the best. But better than a lot. How much attention did my books get? Not much. Maybe because I'm not much of a sale person. Or I didn't know the right people.

But man... one reason is I don't write progressive shit. If the themes of my book touched the right Prog nerve to institute their vision of evil, I probably would have rocketed to the top ten list over night.

18
Shalomtoyou 18 points ago +19 / -1

Yeah, I remember that. And he's right. Her story was tragic, well worth knowing. But her philosophy was that of an immature girl who was still naive even in such straits.

CF: Greta Thunburg.... without the tragic story.

8
Shalomtoyou 8 points ago +9 / -1

Mike Adams said one of Trump's methods to winning the White House is a strategy called Declassification. Ezra Cohen Watnik is in a good position to execute this strategy. Basically, release documents that prove Biden is a traitor who betrayed America to China, amongst other incriminating documents.

In fact, the best solution we have to avoid a Civil War would be to make a deal with Biden. Offer to pardon him, or to not release the documents, in exchange for a concession. Biden conceding would reduce the Civil War the leftists are planning if Trump wins. (Reduce, Not eliminate).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›