1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +2 / -1

I mean, it's not really an excuse. It actually does go against their laws to launch a first strike. They would indeed get fucked up if they did, of course. But they won't. There would be no reason to nuke Ukraine as that will still not make them surrender. It'll only make more countries, including Ukraine, want to acquire nukes.

1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Step 1: let the left form their own country

Step 2: declare war on said country citing historical right to the land

Step 3: enslave the leftists

Step 4: profit

-4
ShampocalypseWOW -4 points ago +4 / -8

Not sure what that has to do with our weapons being smuggled to Africa or not, but I mostly agree with you. I would add that our weapons are pretty good, but what has been more decisive for Ukraine has actually been the training and organizational help from NATO over the last several years. They are able to fight more like a western army. Russia is still stuck in its retarded Soviet way of fighting, which very few exceptions. This makes all the difference, really. Without good organization, leadership, and intel, our fancy weapons wouldn't be nearly as effective. Ukraine is doing very well. I wouldn't say we are holding them back by much by not giving them more amd better weapons. I think the fighting is just that difficult. They have limits on their ability to generate and absorb troops into their force structure. They're doing it, but only at a certain rate. They are losing men at a certain rate too. Their counter-offensives are appropriate to the pace they are capable of based on their limitations and the reality of the battlefield. Russia, on the other hand, clearly has no fucking clue how to fight a coherent war. They tried to zerg rush them and got bogged down. They don't know how to maintain a pace for offense or even how to defend. That's why they keep mindlessly going for these single objectives like Bakmhut, getting nowhere while their lines are pushed back elsewhere. Totally retarded. They showed they had no idea what they were doing from day 1 of this war.

Edit: triggered some russofags lol!

-1
ShampocalypseWOW -1 points ago +2 / -3

It's all awfully silly the way they've gone about this shit. But I guess there must be some factor which ties their hands more than we can see as outside observers. At any rate, the fallout (both literal and figurative) from using nukes I am sure is not something Russia wants to deal with, despite what some of their more retarded propagandists on TV say. If the let that genie out of the bottle it will not end well for them in many different ways.

-3
ShampocalypseWOW -3 points ago +7 / -10

You can see countless videos of Ukrainians using stingers and javelins.

You can fantasize all you want about weapons being used against Americans. Clutch your pearls hard enough and maybe it'll actually happen one day. Do you have any idea how many weapons were smuggled during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?? And not a single jet liner or civilian tank destroyed back home...

0
ShampocalypseWOW 0 points ago +3 / -3

Exactly. I'd like to see how they calculated that that is a 13 year supply. They probably mean 13 peacetime years, which is stupid.

-3
ShampocalypseWOW -3 points ago +6 / -9

The article does not say what kind of weapons have been smuggled out. Likely it will be nothing more than small arms and RPGs.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +2 / -4

The missiles we built to fight the Russian army were used up fighting the Russian army?? You do not say!

1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +4 / -3

On certain issues, surprisingly yes. They annexed parts of Ukraine specifically to give them the legal right to send conscripts there to fight, because they didn't have the legal ability to send them outside the national borders. Also, they had no legal ability to declare war on Ukrainr (nor would they want to because of all that would entail), so they just called it a "special military operation", which is legally a meaningless term. However, it allows them to move the military into action somehow. Ukraine too hasn't declared war for much the same reasons.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +1 / -3

McCarthy was right. But he didn't go far enough.

Nixon did nothing wrong with Watergate. But he took us off the gold standard and opened us up to the ChiComs and for each of those he can never be forgiven.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +1 / -3

Maybe, maybe not. Either way he turned into a bitch.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +1 / -3

There hasn't been a group this faggy since the time the late night tv talk show propagandists got together.

-1
ShampocalypseWOW -1 points ago +2 / -3

Far too late. They should have stood up for our rights before that mandate ever happened. They should have stood up for our rights when we requested religious accommodations, which we had every right to be granted. Now we know every member if the military left will "just follow orders" even if they know it's wrong, because their careers come first.

9
ShampocalypseWOW 9 points ago +14 / -5

Dave sure is a monumental faggot, but Kurt wasn't much better. Read his suicide letter. That changed my mind about him completely. He'd be a woke faggot now too if he had had the balls to get over himself.

-1
ShampocalypseWOW -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yeah, it's bigger than that. But I'm wondering where the dividing line is between short and long flights considering flying top to bottom would take no more than an hour.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +1 / -3

Taiwan gets trained by the US, which has buckets of experience. Also, defending is a LOT easier, especially defending against an amphibious assault.

-2
ShampocalypseWOW -2 points ago +3 / -5

Because war is hard. The kind of war China would need to do is the hardest. And they have absolutely no war experience. Worse, they're corrupt commies with shit equipment.

view more: Next ›