132
11

I am starting to believe that a war is going on between the old NATO loyalists and China. It's a new kind of war involving mind altering viruses. Nano and weather technology. Wokeness to destroy culture. Rigged voting machines. Psychological and even spiritual warfare. This war is designed to not affect commercial life in the same way Standard Oil wasn't affected by WW2. It's a war where the battlefield extends from human thoughts and up into outer space. Instead of bombing enemy nations it reengineers the psychology of the population by turning a virus into a cult. Or making them hate their culture. The collaborators create lockdowns so they can't retaliate.

But here is the thing. All nations have been already defeated by China and occupational governments are already installed with the exception of Hungary, Poland, Belarus and the USA (MAGA) . These pariah states are holding out against China because their leadership understand the existential dynamics of the new kind of world war and are in a kind of psychological and cultural Stalingrad. The Tech Giants see themselves as 'off world' in this Theatre of Conflict, yet will submit to the winner to avoid an actual military engagement regardless of the cost to the human race.

The likes of the Great Reset should be seen as the psycho-culture-economic version of Hiroshima. Why nuke the West when you can train them to destroy themselves from within using everything from Greta Thunberg to Male Pregnancy. Then you are defeated without a single shot fired. Just point to their statues and tell them they are racist.

  • Thomas Sheridan

last time TWIT locked my account for "suspicious activity" it allowed me to request to maintain anonymity, but now there's no option to skip verification. I don't want @Jack to have my number, this is BS!! has this happened to anyone else? they said it was because today is a "sensitive time", so I'm guessing it happened to everyone who stayed anonymous up to this point.

19
11
10
125

Everyone is upset with Sidney Powell "not working with the Trump Campaign or as Trump's personal attorney." Yet I've been looking back to see if I could even find where she was publicly hired by either in the first place. Someone let me know if you find it.

Regardless, Trump will not win the election on the strength of anything Sidney Powell might say or has been speaking about. I wrote over a week ago how Trump will win. Amy Coney Barrett will read the laws of those states regarding the manner in which the respective legislatures have determined the states' electors shall be determined, and she will apply those laws. Any ballots that do not fit within the requirements of the law she will throw out and Trump will win.

Why just her? Because the rest of the High Court is deadlocked. Afterward, any of the ballots she throws out will then themselves be scrutinized. But that has nothing to do with Trump remaining in office. Those determinations are nothing to do with election law. And they are not civil law, as in a civil rights case of Trump against the perpetrators.

No, those determinations relate to CRIMINAL LAW. They are matters for CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Sidney Powell's area of concern has not been anything that will win the election for Trump. There would be no time to work that kind of case anyway, and Sidney Powell would not be in a position of authority to prosecute the cases she has been talking about...at least not yet...Are you getting this?

As a practical fact, fraud will be shown to occur "on the ground" in the states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and now Nevada. The evidence is overwhelming. Those states cannot certify votes when there are more votes than voters, massive drops of votes at once, 98% being for Biden, thousands of pristine mail-in ballots, eye witnesses, etc. etc. And so that is the evidence that will turn over the results in those states for Trump. Presenting that evidence, for that specific purpose, will be the job of Rudy and others on his team.

But recall Thursday's press conference. Rudy spent 40 minutes going over the evidence that will win the election for Trump. All that time Sidney Powell stood behind silent. But when Rudy was finished, what did he do? He called Sidney Powell up to speak to her areas of concern, which all deal with criminality. None of that is even germane to the law suits the Trump Campaign is working in the battleground states. Did Rudy not know what Sidney was going to say? Of course he knew what she was going to say. Well, if her remarks, not only then but on any number of media outlets since have torn a riff among the Trump legal staff, maybe even one between Trump himself and Sidney Powell, then why would Rudy have stood by to let her present her remarks in the first place? That makes no sense.

And so, when things don't make sense, normally that means there is an angle that is misunderstood. So now we have Rudy and staff who will present the cases that will rise quickly to the Supreme Court. Amy Coney Barrett will read the laws and apply them, which means the fraudulent votes will be thrown out in at least Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and likely Nevada. Trump will win.

In the meantime, you will not be hearing from Sidney Powell. The press is going to have a field day with her, they already have. Trump knows the art of war, act weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak. This is a war. Remember, the Germans were certain the D-Day invasion would come via Pas de Calais. But instead it came from where no one expected it, Normandy.

So now, everyone has counted Sidney Powell out. She's a nut, a "conspiracy theorist." Don't be silly. Sidney Powell is one of the most accomplished federal prosecutors on record. She has been lead counsel in more than 500 appeals in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, resulting in more than 180 published opinions. She is a past-president and former governor of the Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit. She is a Fellow and past-president of the American Academy of Appellate Attorneys. A nutty conspiracy theorist would not have a biography like that.

Remember what Sidney said. She is going to "release the Kraken." She would never have an opportunity to do that working as Trumps election law team. Only a prosecutor could do that. She said that any state office holders who are "stupid enough to certify fraudulent votes will be set aside." That is nothing Sidney Powell would have authority to do as one of Trump's campaign attorneys. She tipped her hand with those remarks.

So all this points to one thing. While Rudy and crew work to win the election, Sidney Powell will be sharpening the claws of the Kraken, building the case she will need as a special prosecutor. She has spoken into the public mind what needed to be said. And when Amy Coney Barret agrees with the Trump case and Trump wins the election, the next thing you can expect to hear is that Sidney Powell will head up a team and serve as Trump's Special Prosecutor. Could I be wrong? Yes. Will I be wrong? I don't think so.

150
893