Gotta keep promoting fear before the people realize their own strength or just have positive feelings that lead to them speaking their mind and organizing a meaningful political resistance to corporate tyranny.
Jan. 6 was a great victory. It ended the Republican party as well as the Twitter-Facebook-Google stranglehold on online communications. Or it should if we leverage it correctly.
It's more complicated than that. I also don't think it's fair to call Trump a traitor, I think he was under a lot of pressure that none of us really understand. However, his response that day was not helpful.
But in any event that Trump stuff is not the main point of the video. She is describing what happened on January 6th correctly, and pointing out how ridiculous the media narrative is. And honestly the fact that she dumps on Trump midway through actually makes this a better video to share with normies.
At the very least learn from her attitude. This is the right way to talk about Jan. 6. Not the way Trump or Guliani or anybody else is.
You need to understand what the suspicion is here to understand why the hand recount was not convincing to people who doubt the outcome of the election.
The theory is not that the dominion machines simply switched votes during the tabulation process while leaving the paper trail untouched. That would not be an effective means of carrying out fraud. The whole point of the machines would be to make it possible to carry out fraud while also passing audits of this kind. Essentially they are there to be able to put on an effective show afterwards.
The theory, instead, is that the voting machines keep a running tally in real time of how many votes need to be created, and then the necessary ballots are injected into the system when nobody's watching in one way or another (there are several theories as to how they could be laundered into the system--obviously the mail-in voting system is the prime suspect).
Now here's the crucial thing about this latter theory: it is falsifiable. One of the experts for Trump's team claims that he could forensically determine whether or not a batch of ballots were printed off in mass, he just needed to get access to them. He was never given such access.
Instead Raffensperger simply ran the pre-planned audit, which doesn't even require a conspiracy of 300 to pull off. In fact I know a person who works for local government in Georgia and he initially scoffed at claims of voter fraud. But what made him come to doubt what's happening is when he found out the machines were online after all. It was initially claimed that they have no connection to the internet but here we are. But will anyone listen to him if he makes this complaint? No! And besides, there's no point, the contradiction (together with so many other contradictions in the official accounts of what happened) is already public knowledge and nobody cares.
And besides, hundreds of witnesses have come forward and nobody cares. That's the problem. Initially the observers who said they were told to leave Fulton county early in the night were called liars by the press and government officials. Not credible. Then the video came out. They still call them liars (because there is not audio) but now they claim "yes they left but there was no official announcement."
So yeah, I don't know exactly what went down. I do know that Raffensperger was very quick to run the audit that the machines were designed to pass. I also know that Raffensperger originally promised to allow signature verification on the mail-in ballots but then chickened out, only to lately allow a signature verification months later in the wrong county under the supervision of people at the University of Georgia. And the result was absurd--they claimed a 100% success rate, every single ballot was valid.
Larger point is this: this is the most important election of our life time, and also the least secure in terms of voter fraud security measures. A haphazard mass mail-in voting system was introduced with minimal security. Voting machines shut down and all observers were asked to leave, and then they were started up again in the middle of the night. This was, by the way, initially denied and "debunked" on fact checking websites until that video came out.
And all we hear from liberals and politicians is "you can't prove the fraud with 100% certainty and therefore you should not be given access to the ballots and machines to examine whether your theories are correct." And now, "questioning the election is now incitement of domestic terrorism!"
Never was it said, "Go ahead and take a look, we've got nothing to hide."
So here we are, and gaslighting from people like you isn't pushing us away from the brink, it is only accelerating us towards it. This isn't about Trump anymore. He screwed up and stabbed his people in the back, so we move on without him.
You need to understand what the suspicion is here to understand why the hand recount was not convincing to people who doubt the outcome of the election.
The theory is not that the dominion machines simply switched votes during the tabulation process while leaving the paper trail untouched. That would not be an effective means of carrying out fraud. The whole point of the machines would be to make it possible to carry out fraud while also passing audits of this kind. Essentially they are there to be able to put on an effective show afterwards.
All that the fulton county audit did was recount the ballots that were in the system already.
The theory, instead, is that the voting machines keep a running tally in real time of how many votes need to be created, and then the necessary ballots are injected into the system when nobody's watching in one way or another (there are several theories as to how they could be laundered into the system--obviously the mail-in voting system is the prime suspect).
Now here's the crucial thing about this latter theory: it is falsifiable. One of the experts for Trump's team claims that he could forensically determine whether or not a batch of ballots were printed off in mass, he just needed to get access to them. He was never given such access.
Instead Raffensperger simply ran the pre-planned audit, which doesn't even require a conspiracy of 300 to pull off. In fact I know a person who works for local government in Georgia and he initially scoffed at claims of voter fraud. But what made him come to doubt what's happening is when he found out the machines were online after all. It was initially claimed that they have no connection to the internet but here we are. But will anyone listen to him if he makes this complaint? No! And besides, there's no point, the contradiction (together with so many other contradictions in the official accounts of what happened) is already public knowledge and nobody cares.
And besides, hundreds of witnesses have come forward and nobody cares. That's the problem. Initially the observers who said they were told to leave Fulton county early in the night were called liars by the press and government officials. Not credible. Then the video came out. They still call them liars (because there is not audio) but now they claim "yes they left but there was no official announcement."
So yeah, I don't know exactly what went down. I do know that Raffensperger was very quick to run the audit that the machines were designed to pass. I also know that Raffensperger originally promised to allow signature verification on the mail-in ballots but then chickened out, only to lately allow a signature verification months later in the wrong county under the supervision of people at the University of Georgia. And the result was absurd--they claimed a 100% success rate, every single ballot was valid.
Larger point is this: this is the most important election of our life time, and also the least secure in terms of voter fraud security measures. A haphazard mass mail-in voting system was introduced with minimal security. Voting machines shut down and all observers were asked to leave, and then they were started up again in the middle of the night. This was, by the way, initially denied and "debunked" on fact checking websites until that video came out.
And all we hear from liberals and politicians is "you can't prove the fraud with 100% certainty and therefore you should not be given access to the ballots and machines to examine whether your theories are correct." And now, "questioning the election is now incitement of domestic terrorism!"
Never was it said, "Go ahead and take a look, we've got nothing to hide."
So here we are, and gaslighting from people like you isn't pushing us away from the brink, it is only accelerating us towards it. This isn't about Trump anymore. He screwed up and stabbed his people in the back, so we move on without him.
But also don't forget the role that Jan. 6th is playing in this. Don't apologize for it--It's justified and it's giving the voter fraud discussion urgency and these fools are censoring it like guilty criminals. Keep pressing in real life and online where you can.
Our problem wasn't that the normies didn't believe our evidence and arguments, is that they didn't care one way or the other in the first place, they simply ignored it. Jan 6 made them care--use the opportunity!
That's right, the capitol protest is actually a big win if it is used correctly. It was actually perfect because it was scary enough to start a conversation but totally justified if we are right about voter fraud. And that was our problem--its not that our evidence and arguments are unconvincing, it's that people were just ignoring them. I explain the purpose and proper use of protests here:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RhTio8gO/dont-let-january-6th-go-to-waste/
The key point is that your civil disobedience is designed to make normies pay attention to a problem that they are ignoring. Therefore you should do things which are inexcusable if the problem is not real, but totally justified if the problem is real. So you've got to push the envelope, but don't go too far. And remember the whole purpose is to make people talk about the problem. If you don't do that, if you quake in your boots and apologize as soon as people get upset, you ruin the whole purpose.
So yes, we should keep on making them uncomfortable. But don't go killing politicians and libtards. Scare them, sit in their desks, etc. And keep it focused on the scumbag politicians itself, not commuters and innocent normies like the stupid BLM fags do.
The only way to hit back is to leave the platforms and give them the middle finger. Call them cowards for hiding the truth, use it to point out to your normie friends in real life that the left is run by big tech overlords who censor speech because the truth is not on their side. Then wait for somebody to build an independent platform (or help build one yourself if you know how).
But he's absolutely right, you've got to get the emotion right. Facebook and twitter are absolutely not a big deal. They are stupid websites that didn't even exist long ago, and honestly they are not really effective places to change people's minds. In fact by engaging in politics on those platforms you actually are taking a weak position.
This is also a great victory. IRL redpilling of normies has always been more effective, and now you can say with confidence that the tech sites hide information because the truth is not on their side, and that's your reason for leaving the website. Before Facebook and Twitter were able to create the illusion that all sides had an equal chance in the debate on their platforms, but the conservatives just happened to be losing. Not anymore, they have effectively banned half the country from expressing their political views at all. Take advantage! Stop whining and feeling sorry for yourself! This is a liberation, if people do it right.
But the key is that everyone who's a conservative needs to leave the websites. No more bitching about censorship but then staying on in order to serve as a conservative pinata. Just leave and declare them corrupt.
It's not even that they're corrupt, they are under tremendous pressure not to question anything. There's this false narrative going around that it's "a threat to democracy" to even allow an independent investigation of the election. Think about how fucked that is.
We want Trump's investigators to have access to the machines and the ballots. So yeah that's a good point, we don't want "independent" investigators working for a big leftwing university or who are friends with the people who are trying to cover things up.
This is not an unreasonable ask. If you are suspected of murder you are allowed to bring in your own experts to investigate the evidence. The prosecutor can cross examine these people and test their own credibility against others, so it doesn't mean that your experts should automatically be believed. But they have the right to do this.
It really is disgusting and horrific what has happened here. Given all the shady stuff that has gone down, given all the suspicion floating around, lawmakers and judges and executives should have been quick to allow total transparancy. Instead they systematically blocked full investigations in most places, and just called us crazy for caring.
Don't let them or your liberal friends off the hook. They brought this on and it will permantly damage the republic and it's not Trump's fault--it's their fault and the cracks will only worsen as time goes on.
The fact that a few of the court cases listed weren't the "final stop" does not invalidate all of the information on the website. It just means that some of the information on the website is apparently incomplete.
This is the (now standard) method that lefties use to "debunk" evidence: take a website with literally hundreds of pieces of evidence of your claim, debunk a few of the weaker claims (or in this case point out that some context is missing) and then dismiss the rest wholesale.
To illustrate why this is a fallacious way of proceeding, point out that you can't just dismiss everything WAPO or the NYT reports because some of their stories leave out key pieces of information. This is certainly the case with the Fulton County video, for example. They simply don't tell the whole story--does this mean that every statement made by these organizations is now a lie that can be dismissed?
Yeah you have to know the exact details, they matter and that's why its important to just get one story completely right.
The first "audit" was just a hand recount of the physical ballots which everyone already suspected were printed or mailed in fraudulently. It was carried out by the same people who we suspected of cheating in the first place and observors in the leftwing counties were kept far away as usual. They claimed to see suspicious looking "mail in" ballots without creases but of course nothing could be done about that because everyone you complain to calls you a liar.
Then they did another recount using the dominion machines again after the election was certified, again with the same corrupt vote counters.
Then Raffensperger partnered with the "unbiased" University of Georgia to "audit" the mail in ballot signatures. But they only audited Cobb county, not Fulton county where everyone expected the fuckery to have occured, and they came to the absurdly unlikely conclusion that only two out of 15,000 signatures didn't match correctly, and when they called the people up directly to ask them if they voted they said yes. So all told, Cobb county had a perfect record of signature verification!
At no point was Trump's team allowed to do a forensic analysis of the machines in Fulton or the physical ballots in order to check whether they were printed off. At no point was anybody outside of Raffensperger's office, aside from the cucks at the University of Georgia, ever even allowed to take part in these "audits" and so forth. It's all a farce.
Go to https://hereistheevidence.com/ for all the evidence. I remember a concise summary of the fraud popping up somewhere but normies will dismiss it outright if it doesn't come from a trusted news source. And realistically neither they or anybody else should be willing to trust a summary without investigating and verifying its claims independently. So start with that, but be prepared with the full website when they want more proof of certain things.
If Trump supporters perceive it as a victory, and act like it's a victory all over social media, then it becomes a victory. If they tuck tail and beg for mercy then it becomes a huge loss.
Now if you act like its a victory (without saying anything illegal) and get kicked off social media then fine. Don't whine about that either. Mock twitter and facebook as bullshit websites that are covering up lies and refuse to back down. But better is to talk to people off facebook so it's not even an issue. In person conversations are better anyway because the person is less likely to dismiss what you say outright or treat you with derision due to your physical presence.
Yeah I like this. Another account below me just asked, "if the fraud was real, why wasn't a single case heard in court or won?" Which is a reasonable question for a normie to ask. I think the best quick response is what you said, "If the fraud wasn't real, why don't they just allow an independent audit to put the issue to bed?" Then start linking the clearest evidence and point out how the court failed to act in those cases to drive home the fact that courts are not credible in our corrupt system. Judges are biased and/or scared.
The courts have mostly been dismissing cases over procedural stuff, claiming either that the people bringing the case have no standing or that they brought the case too late. They don't even look at the evidence. The single best website for showing people evidence is here:
https://hereistheevidence.com/
It has a ton of nice features. Much the evidence is statistical in nature so braindead normies won't feel comfortable evaluating it for themselves and just revert to "trusted" news fact check websites which like to pick one weak claim to "debunk," then ignore the rest of the evidence and say there's nothing to see here. And again, normies are too braindead to analyze for themselves so it works.
For that reason I recommend starting with the fulton county video testimony that the Trump campaign gave. Also the Ruby Freeman stuff (although a lot of the videos are linked to twitter which has taken them down, but there are still some left). These show people counting votes in the middle of the night without independent observers, and the story for why they did that keeps on changing, and none of them make it technically legal. At this point the Sec. of State is just saying that he ordered it and yeah technically it wasn't right but they reviewed the video themselves and saw no signs of irregularities so everyone forget about it. But those ballots corresponded to a huge spike in Biden votes, and they aren't allowing a forensic audit of them.
So there you see people counting tens of thousands of votes in the middle of the night after lying and sending observers and the press home. Huge spike in votes for Biden, followed by a complete unwillingess to allow an independent audit by Trump's people and a story which changed multiple times. All of Georgia's "recounting" and "audit" efforts have been undertaken by the very same people that we suspect of cheating.
Once they have that story, let them watch videos of eyewitness testimony, an Indian woman in Michigan is especially credible. Then you can start bringing in all the statistical anomolies, which to me are the most convincing but then again I'm a mathematically literate person.
Yes you do. Focus on pointing them at the fraud. There's no reason to be ashamed of January 6th because the fraud is real, our government disenfranchised us and only a collection of bullies and cowards throw men in jail for sitting on a fucking desk.
Show everyone the Lindsay Graham video, in fact start with that. It sets the tone correctly, reminds everyone that these politicians are a bunch weak, pathetic, corrupt old men who are not worthy of respect.
Honestly "storming the capitol" is way sexier and better. We should thank the media for making us out to be total badasses.
Now we press home the fact that the fraud is real and therefore it was a heroic thing to storm the capitol and scare the crap out of the crooked, holier-than-though fags in Washington. Use this great propaganda victory to sway the normies in your own life. Don't be ashamed of it.
Eh I doubt it. FBI is compromised, it's clear that the government is totally united against us. They're scared because the 1600 lb cows just realized that it is possible to squash the 200 lb men who are, most certainly, leading them into the slaughter house.
A little show of strength does wonders for public opinion. That's why the elites are throwing a tantrum, they're trying to show that they are still the strong ones who you better listen to. They want to show that they are the ones who decides what the rest of your tribe will think of you if you don't think like them.
It's an illusion, and it was cracked on January 6th. Don't get over the top in your social media, but don't surrender and don't apologize for the mostly peaceful events of the day. There was fraud, they stole the fucking election and we have the proof, therefore January 6th was justified.
Talk calmly to your friends in real life and explain to them exactly why you know the fraud is real. Have it worked out. It's the central point of all of this.
And spread that Lindsay Graham video everywhere, especially to your liberal friends. Remember, project strength--show their weakness.
But do it in real life. What facebook and twitter are doing is a blessing because it will finally motivate a shift online. It's impossible to project strength and popularity on those websites and therefore it only damages your movement to try. We need our own parallel websites where we are strong and they are weak and are only allowed on to be mocked and "debunked."
This is exactly correct. They are trying to project strength and it's costing them half the country forever. Republican Senators can't even show their faces in public without being run out by their own voters, to the laughter of the liberals who always hated them.
They can't mass arrest us because we're armed to the teeth and 80% of law enforcement is sympathetic. As soon as any leader arises and makes the call for a "mostly peaceful protest" in any capitol building they're going to have 100's of thousands of people getting more bold every time.
They've got a big fucking problem.
The only "real" things Trump accomplished are the following:
(1) Supreme Court (yes I agree even the reality of that is doubtful) (2) Temporary reduction in immigration rates, we're not in quite as bad a position as we ordinarily would be by now.