2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this the female liberal weirdo version of "Live, laugh, love"?

7
Shmioighan 7 points ago +7 / -0

When the 2A was written it meant anything you could get your damned hands on

Fixed that for you.

8
Shmioighan 8 points ago +8 / -0

Cantillon Effect. Those closest to the source of money injected into the system are the primary benefactors of that money, everyone else receives lesser and lesser benefit from it as it gets passed around. They are getting it from the source - governments that list gibs as "mandatory spending", can print cash from nowhere and have an invested interest in keeping these mandatory spending programs going.

But you have to work yourself ragged to service the loans that pay for it all, then get shit on for it too.

2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only there was someone who could have warned about this as they were considering doing all those things that created this problem. IF ONLY.

7
Shmioighan 7 points ago +7 / -0

This. I can only imagine how this would go down in the rougher neighborhoods. The 90+% graduation rate, 85% illiterate/innumerate places. I'd watch the "Parents React To Footage of Their Kid's Schools" videos any day, lol.

10
Shmioighan 10 points ago +10 / -0

I wonder how much they don't want to include demographics into THIS article.

1
Shmioighan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the only way to solve this is for the next president (a real on) to announce a halt to deportations, then reinstate them a week later once a bunch of people come, then a halt again once they are cleared out, repeating until no one trusts they'll be let in even if told (albeit in a more covert way) they won't get sent back. Then go ham on finding those that got in already. Well, that and ending the gibs entirely.

2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Capitalism" "Progressive" "Democracy" "lower/middle/upper class"

  1. Capitalism is a socialist term to label something that was just basically understood as the thing to do and no one could effectively argue against; Free enterprise and property rights.
  2. Progressive is such a feel good term, makes it sound like there is someplace we should be and they will take us there.
  3. Democracy, every person has a voice and should be heard. Sounds great, except most people have no real opinion on most things, those you elect don't necessarily represent you or push your interests, constant struggle over who should be heard and shifts a lot of political shenanigans into the system of voting itself.
  4. European socialist view of the world as divided into "classes" based on hierarchy, social power and types of income vs the American socialist reinterpretation to meaning income.

This type of garbage goes deep even in casual language.

2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remind me of one time it turned out well when a country relied on foreign barbarians to be it's army while it's "civilized" population became lost in degeneracy and lost it's martial traditions?

3
Shmioighan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guess that silver didn't spend as far as he hoped.

25
Shmioighan 25 points ago +25 / -0

Discrimination based on medical status. Imagine evicting a guy because he lost a limb, grew a wart or developed cancer. Good job just announcing your motives and intent for everyone to see. Exhibit A, Your Honor.

15
Shmioighan 15 points ago +15 / -0

Call me crazy, but I think a lot of women who watch that show do it because they get off on it and not because its some masterpiece of film/fiction or a cautionary tale. Simple as.

1
Shmioighan 1 point ago +2 / -1

I hate to say it, but don't do the "based black! based black!" thing. You don't know her, you can't trust her. She's part of the industry dominated by the left, she's part of a community that goes hard for the democrats, she's very likely to go for the whole CRT/Racial Marxist thing when its convenient, etc. Many such cases. Have some restraint.

2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

More like "Eat the richer than me." A nice moving target that conveniently never includes them.

14
Shmioighan 14 points ago +14 / -0

He had the most bland and placid tweet about it.

To sum it up; "I'm opposed to these mandates, despite being all for all the restrictions previously and even having had the state legislature strip my ability to keep extending my own emergency powers from my office."

3
Shmioighan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck up production side of meat industry

Fuck up delivery side of meat industry

Give "poor" people "free" money to buy stuff, including food and meat products

Prices are going out of control

Increase "free" money to "poor" people to keep buying food

Prices increase further

You are here

Plan to do more to "fix" the problem

16
Shmioighan 16 points ago +16 / -0

From what reading I did a bit too long ago now, they base all their environmental impact and energy efficiency calculations on a projected lifespans of 20, 30, or more years depending on how much smoke they want to blow up someone's ass in order to get paid to build the windfarms. They very often don't make it much past 10, and even then they need replaced blades along the way.

"Projections" and "Computer modeling" are such great grifts.

13
Shmioighan 13 points ago +13 / -0

When you can't tweet, you improvise, adapt, overcome.

4
Shmioighan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its the same situation France had after they made it nearly impossible to fire anyone (6+ month process, full pay during that time regardless of performance or attendance) in a company of over 60(50?) employees. They'd hire right up to the limit and never grow again.

1
Shmioighan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any history outside of living memory is likely highly propagandized or revised in order to fit the needs of the current worldview or to be a weapon against the minds of those who dissent. It goes in every direction, as every actor has an invested interest then as the later generations do now.

8
Shmioighan 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now do the leftist tactic and issue the order again, but worded slightly differently and then target whoever does it with totally non-coordinated funding withdrawal.

2
Shmioighan 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, they are just trading one fear driven paranoia that has a promised security blanket (the stab) for another fear driven paranoia with no security blanket and the hysteria continues regardless. Its why I don't bother talking with the clear opposition or hopeless about this, it might not benefit them and just give them a new reason to despair and be preyed upon by the enemy.

view more: Next ›