"Yes! I have expired prescriptions in the cabinet! I'll pay the fine!"
They're being blatant enough it's boggling.
Practically "I might be a witness" -> "Blam blam blam!"
Of all the various bitcoins, BitcoinSV allows microtransactions (as the 'fee' is fractions of a penny).
Ignoring all the market ra-ra-ra "our is better" arguing from a "Trading perspective", it has the best "Actually works like we need" bits, IMO.
Comes with another wild and crazy guy.
Yes.
They're doing so much crazy shit in all directions it would be hilarious if it weren't horrific.
Michelle Obama's book had 30,000 five star reviews on day one. Mind-blowingly silly. In all directions.
I'll dump one of my previous comments about "Policing comment sections"/"Policing videos" below - the thing is: It's obvious how to do these things if your number one priority isn't the raw control That is the priority, so they suck at it. You can get people to "contribute" very easily, that's what updoots are ...
Treat the megacorporate social platforms as "Virtual Company Towns".
This means a long list of things in one sentence. But note that they meet precisely the sort of problems we had with real company towns. Hanging Judges, no Judges, penalties not commensurate with the crimes, holding property hostage with a "Well, you can leave" attitude, "Protection Rackets", etc. All of it.
Focus on just a (revamped) YouTube for a moment.
"Would you like to be a Virtual Juror in a 2:37 trial for one virtual Google Buck (or, hour of ad-free, or...)? ... Now that you've seen the segment, which of these categories do you think apply? (Child endangerment, animal abuse, copyright infringement, hate speech, criminal threats...)"
You're asking actual people to sit the case. And not the self-selected Karen class types. Honest problems will (mostly) get honestly slammed. "False-flagging" will get trashed. Note also that by not even telling the Juror what the problem with the case was supposed to be, they can't "just lock them all up" - there's 12 Jurors...
Now. Make it cost something to flag. Even a virtual penny would drive the bots out.
As an added bonus, something similar can be used as a "Rating System" and for forming "Keyword lists" for every video. Advertisers would love to hit honest targeted videos ... and they only reason this isn't currently the way it works is Google being the Platform, the Provider's Agent, and the Advertiser's Agent.
Shocking, really, how much of all media, activism, advertising - everything revolves around points in the below:
Under Obama, the official terminology was changed in all directions.
This is why the press is so comfortable using "White Supremacist" and otherwise twisting so hard.
Under the rules they have for parsing, The Donald is the enemy.
It sounds so Orwellian ... because it is .
Wray's under oath discussion of this highlights this, but it's boggling to extrapolate to what it means.
Two rabbis throwing down with two New Black Panther activists -> "Mostly truthful" reporting "Four victims of White Supremacy".
And there's why "The numbers are going up" and then "Well, we need to police that then!" ...
Nothing sane can be done about it before the lawyer-layer loses its qualified immunities.
Awesome.
Needs a post itself really.
John Ringo writes military science fiction/adventure thriller sorts.Think Tom Clancy with more weird-tech.
The number of parallels, oddities, "What in the Hell", and that-can't-be-trues is beyond belief.
All we know for sure is: Our press suck.
Yes.
You don't get to 100% "by accident"
The part that's boggling is:
Wuhan: Ethnicity: Han (100%)
That is: Shockingly super-racist numbers.
The part that's disturbing is realizing these are "swing states" - where there's at least some possibility of an opposition.
Now.
Think about the "Deep Blue Lock" states. They're Single Party Systems. Washington wouldn't need to do anything so crass the fraud is baked in better,
I keep wondering how "Could I see your ID" goes.
And then "I'm going to call the FBI to check, ok?"
There's some 57 agencies with "police powers", random citizen has no way of knowing valid ID from printed at Kinkos at a glance.
I'll point out that WA had a corrupt election in 2004 - and there was a lot of "fixing the election system in WA!" right after that ... so there's been no Red here since.
Even here, Biden had no juice.
Trump said he won all fifty, and I have no countervailing evidence.
That one point is the most telling.
As wild as they're being now, literally persecuting Trump/family/etc has to be on their short list.
So.
Why is the man not panicked? He knows how revolutions go, and how the deposed's family goes...
How about 750k?
See: Sad Puppies.
They're "virtual company towns".
As the only "government" present inside their turf, they need to be abiding by the minor little details like random-not-arbitrary courts...
Not making claims against governments and billionaires.
Liens against future earnings are a thing. And. "Proceeds of a crime" are easy enough to trigger if anyone presses some criminal angle/detail.
IMO, your choices are:
-
"He has sufficient proof he's convinced the 'Truth as Defense' argument will work for him"
-
Literally deranged.
There is no "3) Because it looked fun and will make me money."
I suppose there's always "4) Because 'Country X' will grant me Diplomatic Immunity/Witness Protection/whatever". That's more of 'shill' than 'larp'.
LARPing is only fun and games when you're anonymous.
There's a difference when someone with actual assets (read: worth suing) makes defamatory statements. "4chan" can (and does) say anything they want - anonymity and 'no assets to sue' is their entire protection. But prominent people stating things is a different story.
It is more difficult to get a "public figure", proving "actual malice" can be a problem.
Trump has sued the press directly several times to the point they issue a retraction, for instance.
I haven't followed this particular set of comments, but Lin Wood has been out on a limb on a lot of things since the election - he's essentially bet all his assets at this point, IMO.
According the Wray under oath: (The short, short version)
-
"Attacked a Rabbi", or anything along those lines qualifies.
-
As does "Attacked anyone not distinctly 'white' "
Yes, this does mean that two rabbis throwing down with two hoods is "officially" four victims of white supremacy.
They've relaxed the entire chain of plausible inferences and conclusions to insanity. "I like borders" -> "You mean you like Hitler?!?"
The one I pointed to is SpaceX's Starship. It's on a completely different level - and built from the ground up with the thought of Mars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l9ZxsG9M
Not boarding quite yet.
"May I see your ID?" and "Ok, now I'm calling your office to check" is something I've wondered at.
Telling a fake Driver's License is a skill far, FAR more people have than "Telling a fake cop card". And, even with a real card, their responses should be pretty telling.