Oh really? This one's just for Hunter.
Indeed. In my oppinion what they really need to do right now is push for audits and block any attempt by the dems to hamper them or to make them useless (like in Georgia). Assuming they actually did cheat, the scale of the process was of monstrous proportions and there's no way anyone can achieve something of that magnitude in such short time without making mistakes.
It's actually amazing to watch how they try to hamper the process every, single fucking step of the way. Not one stone left unturned, not one opportunity missed, everywhere they can, they try to either castrate the whole endeavor to the point of uselesness or stop it dead in its tracks outright. How many times do they have to do it before normies start noticing a pattern here?
That would make no sense at all. If every machine would be applying the weighted vote process, they would have to waste an enormous amount of time to coordinate the weighing between different machines. If (assuming it even happened) such an algorithm was deployed, it had to be deployed as high in the chain as possible (preferably on the vote counting server) in order to have access to all the votes in a certain area (state). Otherwise you risk machines outweighing themselves and, if you have malicious intent, you also face a risk of blowing your cover due to insane amount of traffic between machines.
I still have a LOT of doubts about the whole server raid in Germany, but if they have it, then they possibly have all the raw data received by the server before the switching occured. It's nowhere near sure, because the logging procedures in Dominion have been proven to be loose and voluntary, however placing the server half a world away is an insurance policy on its own, so perhaps logs there are kept in better shape. You also don't necessarily have to have the logs if you have the algorithm and the machine it was run on. The only thing you'd need then is to run it back to front to get to the correct results with a small margin of error due to rounding.
From the looks of it they're just as puzzled as everybody else. Assuming they audited the process (and the probably did, as it's a red disctrict), they must have found nothing on their side. Their knowledge however ends where dominion's reign begins.
There's a MUCH more juicy part you're missing here. He said, that yes, the 2017 was basically made up, but he also said, that the company stands with all the previous elections. Peer-reviewed research showed the fuckery in Venezuela began after 2004 and all elections since then have been tampered with. That's the main takeaway here.
I wouldn't go so far with the assumption, that he can read. His "predictions" have much more in common with a chimpanzee throwing shit at a wall with random numbers sprayed on it than with something a person with reading skills can come up with.
Meanwhile in Poland we have 49% positivity rate, hospitals are completely overrun, people are dying due to complete lack of healthcare, there's no doctors left anywhere to help them out and we don't have a lockdown. Just masks, limits on gatherings and social distancing.
Looks like a Biden debate. The only thing you need to do to win is sit back, relax and let them hang themselves.
Now the problem I see here is that the goal is a FAIR election. Throwing out thousands or potentially hundreds of thousands of votes because their own election commission royally screwed their voters doesn't fit in my definition of fair.
I have a weird hunch they're handing Trump his victory only to deter him from digging deeper. Hopefuly it doesn't work.
Great question. I'm guessing it's the same people doing the counting, however one would suspect the AG has the power to put his own team in place... or at least this time around observers will be allowed to oversee the entire process.
From what I understand there's:
-
Recounting - They count all the paper ballots by hand. This would find fraud of the type alleged by the Dominion whistleblower, where they scanned the same ballots multiple times.
-
Auditing - They check all the ballots for deficiencies and signs of fraud. This would find fraud of the type alleged by other whistleblowers like identical signatures over multiple ballots, lack of necessary information on some ballots etc.
-
Recanvassing - They check if the vote totals transmitted from a polling station to the State Board of Elections is correct. So SBE has a certain number of votes from a certain polling place and they check if the polling place has the same number of votes. This would eliminate any errors in transmission, however I'm unaware of any fraud allegations, that could be found that way.
@barnes_law on twatter. He represented the Covington kids (except Sandman), Wesley Snipes in his tax trial and many others. He and @thevivafrei have a weekly podcast on Sunday, where they discuss the legal side of current events. Extremely informative.
Barnes said Lin Wood is useless and I'm inclined to believe Barnes. I was seriously worried when Wood got involved... and his tweets aren't making me feel any better. Lawyers should have mic-drop moments in court, not on twatter. Let's wait and see.
In my oppinion – no.
You don't put all your eggs into one basket. If you can win without the lenghty process of proving the other side cheated, just by pointing out they fucked up the counting process and invalidated their own ballots, and then move to the juicy cheating part once the second term is secured, then why not?
I'm inclined to call bullshit on that claim. 38 million, even if that's the total number switched (-19T/+19B) is just insanely fucking big. Then again the anemic campaign, worst candidate imaginable, nonexistant enthusiasm... who knows.
Your entire election staff should be stolen from you for a year and moved across US state to state to show everybody else how it should be done.