2
SikoraP13 2 points ago +2 / -0

The service has been mediocre, but similar to the .win, it's a good backup at the very least.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant while you can legally. Probably tough to find some. Checking local gun shops who take used inventory can yield some good finds.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

AR15. Get em while you can. Ammo's tough to find at the moment, but it's one of the best investments you can make. Flexible and pretty solid.

If you're talking about going the CC/OC route, I couldn't really speak to that living in the Greater Commissar's Democratic Republic of New York.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Happens to the best of us. I'm thinking the key may be to shooting the loch ness monster.

3
SikoraP13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shit like this makes me wish I liked coffee. I'd buy a few bags.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wicker is a solid alternative. P2P encryption or so I understand.

22
SikoraP13 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is illegal under GA Law....

Georgia Code Title 21. Elections § 21-2-501

Only the electors who were duly registered to vote and not subsequently deemed disqualified to vote in the primary, special primary, election, or special election for candidates for that particular office shall be entitled to vote therein, and only those votes cast for the persons designated as candidates in such run-off primary, special primary runoff, run-off election, or special election runoff shall be counted in the tabulation and canvass of the votes cast.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bigger the district, the more money you need.

I'm not sure that the scale of the district has much of an impact on the amount of money required, at least as far as advertisements go, which from my understanding is how most of the money winds up being spent. Whether it's local stations, which tend to service a large area, so I don't see much cost going down there, or internet ads, which would be required to have more granular targeting, which likely costs more money, makes me think that the money you save on travel likely gets eaten up elsewhere.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

I fundamentally understand the argument he makes, but in a 2-party system, the factions are inherently not small, no matter how small you make the district. His thought process in the Federalist papers is outside the construct of our current understanding of large-scale party machinery.

I agree with him in theory, however, with the lockstep behavior of party actors and the party fundraising machine, the amount of people being represented is irrelevant if the individual is a party parrot and not a true representative of their constituency.

4
SikoraP13 4 points ago +4 / -0

I disagree, mostly because it would create the same rural/urban divide power issues the founders foresaw and sought to prevent.

A total of roughly 6.6K representatives would be needed. NYC alone having 166 representatives. LA proper? 79. Chicago? 54.

In a body where majority rule is required? The disparity would be larger than it is already.

2
SikoraP13 2 points ago +2 / -0

ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA

God it feels good to be on one of the few bastions of freedom left on the web.

55
SikoraP13 55 points ago +55 / -0

For real. Because unless I'm mistaken (which is completely possible), the information is required to be publicly accessible under their state law.

2
SikoraP13 2 points ago +2 / -0

The results. I didn't vote for Trump in '16 because I had no faith the NYer who had always donated to dems would actually govern like anything but a Dem.

Never have I ever been so happy to be proven wrong.

4
SikoraP13 4 points ago +4 / -0

Budget smart contracts are the future of governance.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Sorry, but that'll never happen without a complete re-write of the FAR and DFAR, which, good fucking luck getting the political will to do that.

20
SikoraP13 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yep. Originally, the founders expected a member of the House to represent 30,000 people eventually climbing to one for every 50.000 people. (Check out the unratified Congressional Apportionment Amendment.)

Based on raw population numbers of the US, we're well over 700.000 people per representative.

3
SikoraP13 3 points ago +3 / -0

'Kids', in bed, presumably with his wife. Cuckold confirmed.

Alternatively, pedo confirmed.

8
SikoraP13 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hopefully Trump's attorneys are at the ready to challenge it.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, I'll say it...

Guys, WE might be the Kraken....

5
SikoraP13 5 points ago +5 / -0

Beyond a reasonable doubt only applies to criminal cases, not civil cases, like the ones involving election improprieties. In civil cases, the standard is not beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather beyond a preponderance of the evidence, which essentially just means showing more evidence than not.

If we're talking about prosecuting the fraudsters under criminal statutes later, the BARD standard applies, but now we're at PotE.

1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ned's employer's donors can be found here. Should we ask them what they think about Wayne employing such an individual?

Also, if you'd like to send Ned Staebler of Ann Arbor, MI a gift, well, you'd probably have to look him up on whitepages.com or fastpeoplesearch.com to find an address.

by SHIT
1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

The copy I saw didn't have this in it, but had several other affidavits. Can you send a link?

by SHIT
1
SikoraP13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone got the link to this one? Couldn't find it in the Wood filing I was looking at. The problem with all the lawsuits is that it's difficult to keep the affidavits straight and together.

Has anyone undertaken an effort in that vein?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›