NEW: Iowa Sen. Charles E. Grassley, the Senate president pro tempore, says he and not Vice President Mike Pence will preside over the certification of Electoral College votes, since "we don't expect him to be there."
Need more info on this
And Biden was selected by Obama for the same reason??
Then why did he pick her if not to increase support from Black voters? ... Lets see. If he knew he was going to win through fraud...then did he pick her becuase she would be his partner in further grafting?
China and probably his Chinese wife telling him what to say
Thanks for the outline!
Not directly. But he did just mention her name
The odds of these three states (GA, WI, MI) being so well-represented at the top of the distribution is just over 1%.
And when you factor in that a vote dump in GA is the 9th most extreme point, the odds that these three states have five of the top ten most extreme vote dumps drop to a mere 0.00337%.
Thanks! I could not find it.
SIDNEY, page 1: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” .... Plaintiff only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.
SIDNEY, page 1: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” .... Plaintiff only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.
SIDNEY: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence”
Pedes ignore this comment. As Sidney says in the first page
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result
SIDNEY: The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes.
DOMINION: Dominion Voting Systems are in fact auditable—and are audited and tested regularly by multiple government agencies and independent third parties. All electronic devices used in the U.S. must be designed to be audited
THEY HAVE NOT CONTRADICTED SIDNEYS STATEMENT about specifically auditing for the «MISALLOCATION, REDISTRIBUTION OR DELETION OF VOTES.»
Where did she say this?
about fucking time!
I AM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONT EVER TALK TO ME THAT WAY.
SIDNEY, page 1: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” .... Plaintiff only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.
Re any «errors» They might have uploaded an a draft that is not proofread to draw attention to it through the Streisand Effect. I can see a Drunken Kung Fu strategy in doing that which is not unlike Trumps. Why show your best work to your enemy in the face of so much negative energy - even from so called supporters??
Pedes, ignore the doomer above. Listen to Sidney on the first page:
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result
False flag. She helped to decide the pictures.