It's closed-source (just like Chrome), basically they can do whatever they want.
Yes, I have noticed that Brave blocks YouTube ads. Paradoxically, watching YouTube like this is a great way to f**k Google.
Safari is completely different and made by Apple; Edge is based on Chromium but doesn't remove spyware, ads etc.
It's based on Chromium (not Chrome), and completely de-googlized before adding Brave's features.
I agree, Duckduckgo = leftist.
from non-tracking ads.
He is also the inventor of JavaScript. Basically, a genius.
Duckduckgo = leftist
Watch out, Duckduckgo = leftist (still better than Google though).
It's based on Chromium, not Chrome (if it were based on Chrome it wouldn't make sense).
indeed Duckduckgo = leftist
Brave is a serious project. Definitely not a honeypot.
Brave works properly here.
Sorry but that's not true. Brave is based on Chromium (not Chrome) and Chromium gets completely de-googlized before adding Brave's features.
It's true that Firefox still has some useful options, but Mozilla must be boycotted.
Because Chromium is the most compatible rendering engine at the moment. It also has plenty of extensions and so on.
I agree that a temporary homepage could be convenient, but technically that means having a server already and so on, which could be risky and/or difficult for Parler in this situation. Actually, being completely offline for the time being is the safest option for them.
Strange; Brave works properly with YouTube.
Brave is the original one; Dissenter is just a modified Brave.
That's why Brendan Eich, inventor of JavaScript and former Mozilla CEO, left Mozilla for political and privacy reasons.
Brave includes Tor browser! ;-)
Brendan Eich left Mozilla for political and privacy reasons.
Brave is based on Chromium but is completely de-googlized before adding Brave's features.
Better than Google but still leftist. My advice: Brave
Indeed DuckDuckGo = leftist Also, they don't even own the core search engine, because it's Microsoft's.