Is Milwaukee done already? (Absentee ballots and all)
In her own words: “Equitable footing means WE ALL END UP AT THE SAME PLACE”
Dem-tards, this is who you are electing as your President. Joe Biden is just a measly, scraggly excuse for a “transition” candidate.
Not suggesting people do this, but at least he didn’t suggest that people go around in masks and slash every set of Goodyear tires they see until the policy is changed.
That’s what the left would do if it were the other way around...
But don’t you see the greater irony in his horrendously toxic and rageful beliefs regarding black and brown races in light of BLM’s explicit vocal support for “Marxism”?
Sure he was a bum, as are, were and will be many people. But the guy was toxically racist and vitriolic. How can the so-called left adopt his views and deify him?!?
AND ABOUT HIS OWN SON-IN-LAW!
Marx’s second daughter, Laura, fell in love with a young medical student named Paul Lafargue in 1866. Lafargue was of French-Cuban origin. He was apparently one-quarter Jewish, one-quarter Carib Indian, probably less than an eighth Negro, and the rest French.
Although Lafargue was a socialist and one of Marx’s great admirers, Marx was not at all pleased with the proposed marriage until he discovered that the bridegroom-to-be was the only son of a wealthy West Indian planter whose father planned to settle a large sum on the couple. This not only provided Laura with apparent financial security, but opened up a new source from which Marx himself might borrow money. Marx decided that Lafargue was “a handsome, intelligent, energetic and gymnastically developed fellow”
Lafargue seemed in many ways an ideal son-in-law. He was comparatively rich, a socialist, a man who ran political errands for Marx, a professional, and, by Marx’s standards, a coming man in medicine. This did not prevent Marx from telling Theodore Cuno, a fellow socialist who was emigrating to the United States that one of his daughters had contributed to “solving the color question by marrying a n——-... ,” In addition, Marx habitually referred to Lafargue as “the little Negro” (Negrillo) or as “the Gorilla.”
Laura (Karl Marx’s daughter) bore a second child a year after the first. On January 17, 1870, Jenny Marx (Karl’s wife & Laura’s mother) wrote Engels that she hoped her daughter would practice reproductive restraint and not produce “ten little n——- boys.”
The unpleasant remark which Engels made in 1887, three years before his death, that it was highly appropriate for Lafargue to run for office in a Paris district that included the zoo since “in his quality as a n——-” he was “a degree nearer to the animal kingdom than the rest of us. . . .”
On October 2, 1866, Engels replied to one of Marx’s enthusiastic letters about Tremaux with a long refutation of that charlatan’s theories. At the moment, we are concerned merely with what Engels had to say about Tremaux and Negroes. (As before, when I use the word n——-, it means that Engels inserted the offensive English term into the German text of his letter.)
“The stories about the N——-, Santa Maria, and about the transformation of whites into Negroes are laughable. Namely that the traditions of the Senegal n——s are worthy of unconditional belief precisely because the fellows don’t know how to write! . . . The way the fellow explains how we Rhinelanders on our Devonian transitional rocks (which have not been under water since long before the era of coal formation) did not become idiots and N——s, he will perhaps show us in his second volume, or else assert that we really are n——-s.” -Engels (in private correspondence with Marx)
August 7, 1866, Marx wrote Engels about an exciting discovery he had made. The find was a pompous and preposterous book by a French ethnologist and racist crackpot named Pierre Tremaux which anyone well versed in science and scientific method would have dismissed as rubbish.
Marx, however, hailed Tremaux’s work as marking “a very significant advance over Darwin.” Marx’s infatuation with Tremaux’s race theories will be discussed in considerably more detail in chapter twelve. Here, suffice it to say that Marx wrote Engels that Tremaux had “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one...”
Actually, Tremaux had proved nothing. He had made the extraordinary and, of course, unsubstantiated, assertion that the Negro race was not a product of evolution, but of human degeneration. His actual words were: “The backward negro is not an evolved ape, but a degenerate man,” a finding that, in Marx’s opinion, made Tremaux superior to Darwin.”
From Karl Marx’s own words (his own private love letters to Engels). He talks about his contemporary, Ferdinand Lasalle:
“It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a n----- ). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also n----- -like.”
Source: Chapter 7 of PDF at:
KARL MARX WAS A RACIST
Read Chapter 7 from this PDF:
Go to page 71. Read Chapter 7, “Karl Marx on the Negro.” It’s all based on citations from Marx’s own letters to Engels.
Can someone please publicize this so BLM leaders’ heads start exploding?!?!
Go to page 71. Read Chapter 7, “Karl Marx on the Negro.” It’s all based on citations from Marx’s own letters to Engels.
Can someone please publicize this so BLM leaders’ heads start exploding?!?!
Posting this again because NOBODY seems to be paying attention: Karl Marx was horribly racist himself. Like despicably so. Read his letters to Engels about Ferdinand Lasalle and his own son-in-law which were laced with the n-word. He also mused about slavery being a good thing for America and mocked Lincoln for being weak, in private. He strongly believed that people of African origin were less than full human. Not making any of this up. PM me if you’d like reputable links to original sources referencing his own written letters. Or.. you can Google it.
Karl Marx was horribly racist himself. Like despicably so. Read his letters to Engels about Ferdinand Lasalle and his own son-in-law which were laced with the n-word.
He also mused about slavery being a good thing for America and mocked Lincoln for being weak, in private. He strongly believed that people of African origin were less than full human. Not making any of this up. PM me if you’d like reputable links to original sources referencing his own written letters. Or.. you can Google it.
Interesting tale of Marx’s mixed race son in law:
Marx’s second daughter, Laura, fell in love with a young medical student named Paul Lafargue in 1866. Lafargue was of French-Cuban origin. He was apparently one-quarter Jewish, one-quarter Carib Indian, probably less than an eighth Negro, and the rest French. Although Lafargue was a socialist and one of Marx’s great admirers, Marx was not at all pleased with the proposed marriage until he discovered that the bridegroom-to-be was the only son of a wealthy West Indian planter whose father planned to settle a large sum on the couple. This not only provided Laura with apparent financial security, but opened up a new source from which Marx himself might borrow money. Marx decided that Lafargue was “a handsome, intelligent, energetic and gymnastically developed fellow” with “an exceptional talent for medicine.” Lafargue’s “exceptional talent for medicine” may seem dubious to the modern reader since he believed that the main cures for disease were “alcohol and electricity.”4 He opposed Pasteur’s discoveries and sent Marx articles that maintained that germs were spontaneously created.5 Whether he was a potential medical genius or not, Lafargue in time abandoned medicine for unsound business schemes and socialist politics. Lafargue seemed in many ways an ideal son-in-law. He was comparatively rich, a socialist, a man who ran political errands for Marx, a professional, and, by Marx’s standards, a coming man in medicine. This did not prevent Marx from telling Theodore Cuno, a fellow socialist who was emigrating to the United States that one of his daughters had contributed to “solving the color question by marrying a ni—er. . . ,”6 In addition, Marx habitually referred to Lafargue as “the little Negro” (Negrillo) or as “the Gorilla.”7
Omg there is a LOT more (and in Karl Marx’s own writing): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tom_Brown24/publication/339471486_Karl_Marx_racist_Nathaniel_Weyl/links/5e54916c4585158f40ec564f/Karl-Marx-racist-Nathaniel-Weyl.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Look at Chapter 7.
http://hiaw.org/defcon6/works/1862/letters/62_07_30a.html
On Ferdinand Lasalle:
“ It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a n----- ). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also n----- -like.” -Karl Marx
Marx liberally (no pun intended) made use of the N-word and all sorts of horrible insults against blacks in his private letters to Engels.
Statue removals, anyone?
Amen, Shadowbrother3001! :)
Obviously, we are all casting our ballots for DJT here. Nobody in their right mind would vote for the shill BLM candidate.
The point is that so many people (who opposed DJT anyway, before this) aren't in their right minds right now, that they would get diverted into this fruitless channel. Hoisted with their own petard, if you will.
Not really. It is not actually supporting. It's a clever tactic to allow the left to cannibalize itself.
Someone really ought to circulate this more. It would lock in the election of the Donald. I really think it could work.
Can people please poke holes in the strategy so that we can refine it, and then 'roll it out to production', so to speak? :)
The CNN-mentioned letter is far from a 'straw man'; people are using this same letter (outside of CNN) to justify protests while still allowing COVID-related lockdowns to adversely affect the economy.
As far as insinuating that this is part of a racist agenda, you're the one attempting to draw conclusions from this accurate data. The fact is that I'm discrediting the notion that issues caused by white people are the greatest threat to black people's health.
This is even before adding granularity as to the causes of death (such as black-on-black crime, the negative effects of living in a ghetto, etc.). Even at the broadest level, this has too strong of a correlation to be explained by random chance: the fact that states with higher proportions of black people have lower life expectancies for black people. If you break this down by cities vs townships in suburbs, you will likely end up seeing the same.
It might not be totally synced up but this is the original, accurate footage.
Cops got charged but all were acquitted without outrage.
Someone should start #WLDM (White Lives Don't..)
Nobody protested. All got away without a conviction or a single femtosecond of jail time.
Justice isn’t blind, but is as biased and partisan as ever.
Interesting, the fact that Kissinger was revealed as a dirty elitist, globalist, dirtbag, who supported Islamic terrorism (Pakistan) against based India, only a few months ago and the US liberal media remained completely silent on it:
https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/scavengers-sexless-suck-up-experts-nyt-contributor-scoops-deeply-racist-kissinger-nixon-remarks-on-indians-136368
This fossil should have been ejected years ago, and sent to the elephant graveyard where all the other RINO’s are being stored.