If we want to win this election, we need to spread it loud, clear and without a shadow of a doubt:

A VOTE FOR JOE BIDEN == A VOTE FOR KAMALA HARRIS, FOR PRESIDENT

Since the unsightly cheek job / facial surgery Kamala had in July, she’s had an unhealthy thirst for regaining her chances at control of the White House in nefarious ways.

If it were a Trump v. Harris race, given her liberal, a-principled and flip-flopping history, as well as her personal pattern of vileness and abuse, she would have stood no chance. Can you imagine her having won WI, FL, IA, even AZ or New Hampshire?

She’d have faded away back in the void of fakeness and short-lived talking points that she crawled out of.

Unfortunately, now with a potential Biden Presidency in January (due to the radical anti-Trumpers “settling” for him as palatable enough), such a scenario will almost certainly result in a President Harris.

Have you seen what 4 years in the power seat has done to past Presidents (Clinton, Bush, Obama, even GEOTUS)? There is a markedly lower level of spirit and enthusiasm after those 4 grueling years. Biden doesn’t have that much to begin with, so it’s certain he won’t make it through the other end. In fact, I fully expect him to pull off a virtue-signaling, race-baiting classless move like “stepping down for the sake of diversity” (similar to some phony, west coast CEO’s/board exec’s) simply to give Kamala the Presidency and the opportunity to pardon himself and Hunter.

If we want any chance of winning handily next week: We NEED, We NEED, We NEED to relay everywhere that the Biden/Harris ticket is a sham being played on the American people. That anyone voting for that ticket is in fact voting for a Harris/<insert annoying blue-haired obese diversity placeholder here>.

I find it appalling that practically no one is talking about this possibility, despite the fact that this is the only way things can play out if Trump loses this year.

Hi all,

I’m trying to think of a suitable explanation/counter-argument to all the Twitter bozos citing that GEOTUS was publicly golfing while his brother passed away. We have the media painting him as Hitler or some sort of evil anti-human robot because of this, and it’s important to address such claims early on (as they can fester and be used alongside other mistruths (like: ‘He called Nazis fine people!’ And ‘He mocked a disabled reporter!’) to convert undecided potential voters).

I can think of a few explanations, but wanted to get my fellow pedes’s thoughts.

1. The President visited Robert the day before his death on Saturday, which was completely unexpected so soon (as of Friday). Very hard for the president to shuffle last minute, as he is a busy guy (golfing == business, strengthening connections) and to abruptly leave on a possibly false alarm would be bad and cost taxpayers via Secret Service security and a last minute Air Force one ride (especially if Robert immediately recovered but passed away say Sunday or Monday). Also President Trump probably needs a higher degree of security than normally would be expected for a president when traveling to New York City due to the tremendous violent militarism threatened against him. Again, this could be put in the light of: “the President wanted to but couldn’t spend time with his brother beside his deathbed because of the militant left, and then was too sorrowful and proud to publicly provide this explanation later.”

2. Robert Trump was an avid golfer (you can google this). He may have strongly pushed his brother (the President) to go golfing on this day and not to see him like this and subject himself to any more pain and risk by sticking around a New York City hospital! He may have said that the best way to honor him was to go do what Robert loved doing the most so that Robert could vicariously experience this through Donald as he passed. We have no idea what heartfelt, emotional and PRIVATE exchange went on between brothers behind closed hospital doors.

Does anyone have any other possible explanations? I know GEOTUS isn’t one to ever politicize a deep personal loss, but it’s important for us (his supporters) to stand up for him against the defamatory and relentlessly cruel left.

Biden falsely started saying his wife and daughter were killed by a drunk driver! Their people have 0 shame in capitalizing and even exaggerating a family loss. Trump most closely resembles the description in Rudyard Kipling’s poem, “If.”

“If you can keep your head when all about you

Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,

If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,

But make allowance for their doubting too;

If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,

Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,

Or being hated, don't give way to hating,

And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream - and not make dreams your master,

If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;

If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster

And treat those two impostors just the same;

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken

Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,

And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings

And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,

And lose, and start again at your beginnings

And never breathe a word about your loss;

If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew

To serve your turn long after they are gone,

And so hold on when there is nothing in you

Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,

Or walk with kings - nor lose the common touch,

If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,

If all men count with you, but none too much;

If you can fill the unforgiving minute

With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,

Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,

And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!”

Our condolences to the President, a brother and fellow man...

No, seriously! Using the current ennui (of the total abandonment of all logic by the left, and even many in the so-called 'center'), one could probably successful place a candidate at the helm of a new 'Black Lives Matter' Party, and cross-list this person at the top of the Socialist ticket (not sure if they've chosen a candidate yet, and even if they have, maybe push that person out and say it'd be racist of the Socialist party not to accept this new, more viable option).

Then, once this person is atop the ticket of the now-popular BLM Party and ever-hip-among-losers Socialist Party, start going at Biden from the deranged left.

• Cite ridiculous things like "do we need another old, white male president?" (presuming that our new BLM party shill is none of these things)

• Start trying to find Biden's genealogical tree (if we can't find it, make one up) showing that he is the direct descendant of slave owners through at least a few different paths. Cite this as a reason for deranged leftists to never vote for him (as he currently owes back-reparations and is not even acknowledging the sum, let alone set up a payment plan).

• Highlight the fact that he does not want to abolish the police.

• Start quoting and avidly distributing Joe Biden's Best of the 70s (preferably in video format), like this beauty:

I think the Democratic Party could stand a liberal George Wallace—someone who's not afraid to stand up and offend people, someone who wouldn't pander but would say what the American people know in their gut is right. - Joe Biden, 1975

(George Wallace was famously a segregationist and literally had KKK members writing some of his speeches.)

and this:

(W)hen it comes to issues like abortion, amnesty, and acid, I'm about as liberal as your grandmother. I don't like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far. I don't think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body. I support a limited amnesty, and I don't think marijuana should be legalized. - Joe Biden, June 1974

another beauty (this time against racial integration):

We've lost our bearings since the 1954 "Brown vs. School Board" desegregation case. To "desegregate" is different than to "integrate." I got into trouble with Democratic liberals in 1972 when I refused to support a quota-system for the Democratic National Convention. I am philosophically opposed to quota-systems; they insure mediocrity. The new integration plans being offered are really just quota-systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with; what it says is, "in order for your child, with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son." That's racist! Who the hell do we think we are, that the only way a black man or woman can learn is if they rub shoulders with my white child? -Joe Biden, September 1975

• Focus the above in purple states the strongest (PA, MI, WI, FL, AZ even MN).

By the end of this, if our new foil candidate receives even 5% of the vote in those states (and that is a very low estimate, in this crazy post-logic world), we should handily have GEOTUS elected for 4 more years to keep doing his thing! You will have effectively SAVED AMERICA!********

No, seriously! Using the current ennui (of the total abandonment of all logic by the left, and even many in the so-called 'center'), one could probably successful place a candidate at the helm of a new 'Black Lives Matter' Party, and cross-list this person at the top of the Socialist ticket (not sure if they've chosen a candidate yet, and even if they have, maybe push that person out and say it'd be racist of the Socialist party not to accept this new, more viable option).

Then, once this person is atop the ticket of the now-popular BLM Party and ever-hip-among-losers Socialist Party, start going at Biden from the deranged left.

• Cite ridiculous things like "do we need another old, white male president?" (presuming that our new BLM party shill is none of these things)

• Start trying to find Biden's genealogical tree (if we can't find it, make one up) showing that he is the direct descendant of slave owners through at least a few different paths. Cite this as a reason for deranged leftists to never vote for him (as he currently owes back-reparations and is not even acknowledging the sum, let alone set up a payment plan).

• Highlight the fact that he does not want to abolish the police.

• Start quoting and avidly distributing Joe Biden's Best of the 70s (preferably in video format), like this beauty:

I think the Democratic Party could stand a liberal George Wallace—someone who's not afraid to stand up and offend people, someone who wouldn't pander but would say what the American people know in their gut is right. - Joe Biden, 1975

(George Wallace was famously a segregationist and literally had KKK members writing some of his speeches.)

and this:

(W)hen it comes to issues like abortion, amnesty, and acid, I'm about as liberal as your grandmother. I don't like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far. I don't think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body. I support a limited amnesty, and I don't think marijuana should be legalized. - Joe Biden, June 1974

another beauty (this time against racial integration):

We've lost our bearings since the 1954 "Brown vs. School Board" desegregation case. To "desegregate" is different than to "integrate." I got into trouble with Democratic liberals in 1972 when I refused to support a quota-system for the Democratic National Convention. I am philosophically opposed to quota-systems; they insure mediocrity. The new integration plans being offered are really just quota-systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with; what it says is, "in order for your child, with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son." That's racist! Who the hell do we think we are, that the only way a black man or woman can learn is if they rub shoulders with my white child? -Joe Biden, September 1975

• Focus the above in purple states the strongest (PA, MI, WI, FL, even MN).

By the end of this, if our new foil candidate receives even 5% of the vote in those states (and that is a very low estimate, in this crazy post-logic world), we should handily have GEOTUS elected for 4 more years to keep doing his thing! You will have effectively SAVED AMERICA!

We have been hearing from so-called ‘healthcare experts' that the greatest threat to black health is white nationalism, injustice and oppression caused by white (and potentially other non-black) people. [ See: https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/05/health/health-care-open-letter-protests-coronavirus-trnd/index.html ]

Now, if this were true, then why is this?: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/life-expectancy-african-american https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_African-American_population

The top 4 states for Black life expectancy are:

1. Minnesota (79.7 yrs) - Black population: 4.57% (rank #33*)
2. Massachusetts (78.81 yrs) - Black pop: 8.1% (#27)
3. Connecticut (77.78 yrs) - Black pop: 10.34% (#23)
4. Washington (77.53 yrs) - Black pop: 3.74% (#38) *Adjusted ranks by 1 to remove Virgin Islands, which is not a state and no per-race life expectancy data is available

The bottom 4 states for black life expectancy are:

1. Washington DC (71.61 yrs) - Black pop: 50.08% (#1)
2. Arkansas (72.16 yrs) - Black pop: 15.76% (#13)
3. Mississippi (72.4 yrs) - Black pop: 37.30% (#2)
4. Louisiana (72.44 yrs) - Black pop: 32.4% (#3)

I.e., a black person, on average, is expected to live 8+ years longer in Minnesota (4.6% black) than Washington DC (50.1% black).

For Black men in particular (who, according to the media, are supposedly at higher risk of being targets of oppression, racism and brutality at the hands of other races, specifically white people), the correlation is starker: [ See: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/life-expectancy-african-american-male ]

Top 3 black male life expectancy states:

1. Minnesota (77.03 yrs) - Black proportion of population: 4.57% (#33)
2. Massachusetts (75.75 yrs) - Black population: 8.1% (#27)
3. Washington (75.21 yrs) - Black pop: 3.74% (#38)

Worst 3 black male life expectancy states:

1. Washington DC (66.53 yrs) - Black pop: 50.08% (#1)
2. Arkansas (68.67 yrs) - Black pop: 15.76% (#13)
3. Louisiana (68.70 yrs) - Black pop: 32.4% (#3)

Black men live, on average, a whopping 11 more years in Minnesota (4.6% black) than in Washington DC (50.1% black)!

I will concede that Black people (specifically males) live shorter lifespans than Whites in America, but a lot of that has confounding variables related to poverty, education and even dietary & smoking habits. What about the fact that Black Americans clearly live far longer in states where they make up a smaller proportion of the population? What would be the confounding variable there, if white people pose such a great risk to black people's health?

If black lives truly matter to the media and other visibly concerned parties, then why are they not addressing the fact that disproportionately greater threats curtailing black peoples’ lives exist in states that have the highest proportions of black population? Clearly, this indicates that the proportion of white and other non-black people correlates not only with higher black lifespans, but also a reduction of these risks.

I have repeatedly tried posting the above on reddit, Facebook and Twitter (a summarized version), only to have it pulled down. Can someone either find the holes in the above or share it on your broader social media venues for an open discussion?