5
Sillylibtards2020v2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Two great examples of the kind of people trying to destroy our county.

Kwanza lady with the I don't care about facts I'm here to show everyone how stupid I is, and white people racist and you tryin to disenfranchise black pplz.

Then you have the millennial narcissist Cuckboy that's reading off the notes he made while watching CNN, believing every word they told him.

4
Sillylibtards2020v2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I showed up late and watched the last half live. It's worth watching.

2
Sillylibtards2020v2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe Trump made him eat it with a fork and knife.

5
Sillylibtards2020v2 5 points ago +5 / -0

TV in the 90s (or at least the mid to late 90s) was a million times better than the crap on TV now.

TV now is nothing but shoving diversity and liberal politics down your throat. Comedy has disappeared because everyone is too afraid to tell a joke that might offend someone. Shit, most of the stuff coming out of hollywood is just remakes of old stuff because they're so brain dead they can't come up with anything new.

Shows in the 90s at least had more relatable or believable characters and stories. I would love to have some good solid new shows like Home Improvement or Friends, but that's exactly what the libtards in hollywood don't want, even if it means better ratings and more money for them.

Last Man Standing is a perfect example of that. It was one of ABC's best shows and they canned it because the characters were white conservatives. It was pretty much the only new show I watched, but ABC dropping it caused two of the actresses to move on to other projects so they were replaced when FOX picked them up and it hasn't been the same since.

1
Sillylibtards2020v2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Zaowood linked 2, but I'm not familiar with either. I just use multiple search engines (google, bing, DDG) until I find what I'm looking for.

5
Sillylibtards2020v2 5 points ago +5 / -0

DDG has definitely gone down hill as far as returning unbiased search results. It wasn't that long ago you could search something on DDG and it would return results from websites I've never heard of. Search that same subject today and it's nothing but MSM BS like you mentioned.

2
Sillylibtards2020v2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are correct. Twitter has "power" because it has money and the ability to influence public opinion by amplifying or suppressing certain topics/opinions, and they would have neither without a large user base.

I agree that less regulation is always better, but some problems need to be solved by legislation. The Civil Rights Act shouldn't have been necessary because everyone should act like decent human beings, but imagine how different this country would be today without it.

You are also right that educated/informed users wouldn't join or stay a member of abusive services, and if we had more educated/informed people then CNN's ratings would be even lower then they currently are and socialism wouldn't be a real threat. If someone isn't educated by their family/friends/peers or in school, then how will they ever become educated if social media and the MSM only shows them one side of the story and preaches it as fact? This is also why conservatives can't completely leave these platforms because the uneducated would only be exposed to one side which leads them to becoming NPCs because they never learn critical thinking skills.

Twitter also started off as a fair and open platform, because it wouldn't have gotten off the ground if it wasn't. Now Twitter has gotten big enough and rich enough that they can censor conservatives without much fear of their business crashing into the ground. Twitter, and even more so Facebook, are a new kind of monster similar to a monopoly.

These companies have grown so large that it's hard for users to leave.

  1. Many websites allow you to login using your Facebook account, so if you leave you have to worry about the 20 other websites you have tied to Facebook.
  2. Users build up a network of followers that they would have to rebuild from scratch on a new site.
  3. Users would also lose any history they have built over the years (posts, pictures, etc.)
  4. For most users moving to a new site that lacks celebrities they follow or friends and family would defy the point of having a social media account.
  5. Social media is also a hard habit to break for a lot of people due to the constant dopamine hits.

I don't know the solution, but I don't think quitting social media or waiting for an alternative is the answer. Look at the threat social media, google, the MSM, and corrupt politicians pose when they collude. Since these companies are world wide what's stopping the CCP from pumping money into Twitter if it begins to falter, or from pumping money into their preferred startup that will say they are open and neutral until the become big enough to do whatever they want without much repercussion.

And this problem is only going to get worse as technology advances and more of our lives go online. The Internet isn't going away and these problems will need to be addressed at some point, so we might as well do it now before our country is stolen from us. Cause we won't have a chance once Google and the Dems implement a social credit system.

3
Sillylibtards2020v2 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is a good point about the EULA, and I agree that people should leave twitter, but that's not the solution to this problem.

I think the big social media companies like Twitter and Facebook have grown too large and have too much power now that by the time enough users move to a competitor, or if they ever do, it will be too late. If everyone migrates to a Twitter competitor what is stopping the competitor from performing the same type of censorship once they grow large and powerful enough? Now is certainly not the time to leave Twitter and help them silence conservatives while they along with the msm try to convince the public that there was no fraud in this election.

Social media is unlike anything we have ever seen before and it's hard to classify, so I think whatever changes to the law are made need to also directly address social media (or other services that's primary purpose is for communicating) rather than only clarifying publisher/platform from section 230.

The Constitution protects our rights from being infringed upon by the government, but I'm sure our founding fathers never imagined that one day something besides a government would become powerful enough to take certain rights away from the people.

10
Sillylibtards2020v2 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lol that's great. Not even denying that a technician can manipulate the system, just denying that a technician can't do it the exact way Sydney alleged.

13
Sillylibtards2020v2 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm sure you could accomplish this with less than 10 people in one area. I'm sure there were only a couple people in suite 614 at the State Farm arena after the "pipe burst".

And it only needs to happen in a few key areas around the country for it to flip an election, so it could potentially take less than 100 people nationwide to pull this off.

8
Sillylibtards2020v2 8 points ago +9 / -1

The difference is you are the end user for that accounting software.

Dominion or Smartmatic are the developers. They can design the program to have limitations for the end users (poll workers, election officials) but they can make the software do whatever they want including manipulating votes but making the audit logs look legitimate.

The code and random systems are supposedly inspected by govt agencies and third party companies (I'm sure those audits are totes fair and not corrupt in anyway /s), who should technically catch any malicious or questionable code. But I would imagine they don't take any chances with audits and have legitimate code on the machines 99.9% of the time.

Systems weren't physically secured before the election (philly warehouse) and we've heard stories about these systems getting last minute updates at a few places, so how do we know the code in those updates were inspected? And it could be as simple as changing a line or two of code, then removing that code when you are done manipulating the vote and before there's a chance the machine gets audited. At least if the system is not connected to any network this would have to be done physically at the machine, but even then I'm sure there are ways around having to stick a usb drive into the machine, maybe some hidden nfc or wifi capabilities. But there were also reports some of these machines were connected to the internet when they weren't supposed to be.

1
Sillylibtards2020v2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not a lawyer, but since Simpson murdered someone it was a criminal case which means they had to have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to prove him guilty. That doesn't mean proven to the point where there is no chance for error, just an overwhelming chance he was guilty.

This is a civil case so the evidence for fraud, obstruction and whatever else they present needs to prove that the chances this happened were more likely than not. Or a 50.00001% chance it happened to a 49.99999% chance it didn't happen.

3
Sillylibtards2020v2 3 points ago +3 / -0

The big day will have to be sometime before Thanksgiving, because Trump's team wants everyone talking about the fraud when they are together with family and friends.

Generally when you have info that's damaging to your opponent you drop it earlier in the week so it has more visibility. That's why the FBI liked dropping info on the Hillary server investigation on Fridays.

Scenario A is the big day comes this week as suits are filed. Scenario B is a lot of info goes public this week when the suits are filed and then Trump's team drops the MOAB early next week before Thanksgiving. I'm hoping for scenario B.

2
Sillylibtards2020v2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have a link to the MAGA video with the seven nation army remix? I used to love that one but can't find it anywhere since the white stripes threw a fit about it.

1
Sillylibtards2020v2 1 point ago +1 / -0

imagine this idiot trying to negotiate with Xi or Putin.

That's what Hunter is for. The big guy already knows he's getting 50%.

1
Sillylibtards2020v2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since the movie is included free with Prime then that means they make between $0.04-$0.10 per hour streamed. At least that's what I was able to find in several articles when Amazon cut the royalties payout by 33% a couple of years ago. The actual rate requires you to have an account setup with them for uploading movies, and is determined on some factors like popularity, ratings, etc. So I'm sure amazon will do everything they can to limit the money paid out to a conservative filmmaker.

At the time of writing this comment there were just under 11k views for the video on the link. Assuming each viewer watched the entire video and also has a prime subscription, which we know isn't the case, then the filmmaker missed out on $650-$1,650.

I would assume the filmmaker's primary intention was to layout facts to expose the BS that the Democrats and Deep State have been pulling for the past 4+ years to normies who haven't kept up with all of the developments over the years like we have.

I agree the filmmaker should be compensated for the great job they did making this film, but with so much stacked against us I think $1,650 is an absolute steal for 11k+ redpills, and I'm sure the filmmaker would agree with that.

TLDR: $1,650 for 11,000+ redpills is a steal.

88
Sillylibtards2020v2 88 points ago +88 / -0

We all know the Dems are going to cheat, but I think they'll overestimate support for Biden and underestimate how many people will be coming out to vote for Trump because of the shit they've put this country through in the past year.

3
Sillylibtards2020v2 3 points ago +3 / -0

An unbiased AI would seem to lean to the right because computers think using logic, not feelings.

1
Sillylibtards2020v2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree that Trump hit the Dems fast and hard in 2016 and they didn't know how to counter, which lead to them panicking and having the MSM blow it's cover in a desperate attempt to stop or at least slow Trump down.

They had 4 years to plan for this, and the libtards put all their eggs into the impeachment basket. After 3 years of that they moved to their emergency backup plan, fan the flames of racial division, try to destroy the economy and use the pandemic as a means to attempt to steal the election.

Like all things Democrats touch, this plan turned into a big steaming pile of shit. 4 years to come up with a plan and they picked Dementia Joe as their candidate? If they had picked even a no name half decent candidate there might have been a chance their plan worked out. But as Hollywoodwarrior said there is too big of a gap for them to close with stolen votes.

I'm sure they'll make the election close, but then again it's the Dems so they're probably overestimating support for Biden and will still come up short.

As far as why the media and big tech are complicit is because they are in bed with the Dems. Look at how many connections there are between government officials and higher-ups in MSM, there was stuff going around in 2016 of who was married to who and it all makes sense. Big tech loves Dems because they are easy to buy and their policies benefit them. Cheap labor with H1-B visas and such, they can outsource work for a fraction of what they would pay an American, but they still get to charge full price. So yes Dems, big tech and MSM are all in bed together.

6
Sillylibtards2020v2 6 points ago +6 / -0

The fact that they don't try to assimilate is what kills me. It's sad what this beautiful state has turned into. I used to live in Centreville and it still bothers me seeing entire shopping centers with store signs only in korean.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›