2
SilverCoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is actually a very interesting point and the first time I hear about it. So just going off that information, if we assume CA is fraud-free, either:

  1. CA, a solid blue state, apparently didn't share the rest of the country's enthusiasm for Joe (and/or they really really liked Hillary). Or..

  2. CA did share the enthusiasm, and a huge amount of Hillary 2016 voters decided to vote for Trump this time around (while Trump 2016 voters in neutral states decided the opposite).

1 would suggest that the voter count was artifically inflated, and 2 would suggest that initial Trump votes were changed to Biden/thrown away.

1
SilverCoyote 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't live there anymore so I wouldn't know haha. The only reason I found out is from double-checking my voter registration status info on their website. Under the mail-in ballot section, there was a confirmation that my ballot was already sent to my previous address, even though I never asked for one nor did I ever opt in for any other mail to be sent.

I did end up voting at my polling location(as it confirms in voting history), so I'm not worried about my vote. Although I can't help but wonder..what if I didn't go vote? What if my ballot was sent back to the post office and the Dems were losing? What if the current residents decided to vote for me?

17
SilverCoyote 17 points ago +17 / -0

California pede here, this guy is probably right. There's likely no "election" fraud here, but there sure as hell is voter fraud. The new types this year are: sending multiple ballots to democrats, sending unsolicited ballots to voters just because they live in blue districts, sending unsolicited ballots to voters that moved away from blue districts (this one actually happened to me, fuck you I never asked for a mail-in ballot!), etc., etc.

Thing is it's all preemptive ballot harvesting, so I don't even know if it's possible to prove fraud..let alone even be worth it to take it to court.

In other words.. here in the the Golden State, it's just business as usual.

6
SilverCoyote 6 points ago +6 / -0

Contrary to popular belief, Benford's law actually predicts the opposite of what a real-life dataset looks like. Therefore, since Biden's numbers were nowhere near the curve, he definitely did not commit election fraud!"

-The media tomorrow or something

6
SilverCoyote 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's what I've been saying for the past 4 years. My more liberal friends would always say that there is no way they would ever be able to entrust the future of America to an egotistical 70yo billionaire TV star. Yes, Trump is 100% all these things, and that is exactly why I trust him. A billionaire nearing the end of his life is immune to bribery and corruption. He doesn't care about money, long-term power, or any other worldly pleasure. The only thing he has to gain is glory. Trump wants to be remembered for generations as the greatest president to ever live. With an ego bigger than the planet itself, he may even want to be remembered as the savior of the modern world. How does Trump except to achieve this? By making America greater than its ever goddamn been.. God bless Trump, God bless America.

13
SilverCoyote 13 points ago +13 / -0

Actually that vid was proven to be fake. The pheasant in the video was later confirmed to be a well-known method actor.

6
SilverCoyote 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's my understanding that the concern regarding the dems illegally adding extra votes into the batch has to do with the ballots sent in by fake voters(like coyote Jose from Mexico, or old Mr. Smith who dropped dead more than 30 years ago). Those ballots were cast in weeks ago and would be virtually impossible to even begin distinguishing which ones are fake.

That being said, while you can fake a ballot, you can't fake the date they were sent in. The dates on the ballots are unalterable and can be verified as on time/late almost immediately. So if they were just thrown into the batch, it'd be very simple to just take them out later.

2
SilverCoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just curious, do you know/have a list of the states that legalized it? Or if there was a group of states that enacted it together(like the National Popular Vote bill)? I have a feeling that most of them are blue

5
SilverCoyote 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's always very cool to read the POVs from people with uncommon perspectives. I learned a lot from your comments, thanks deaf pede

1
SilverCoyote 1 point ago +1 / -0

This pic is probably the best you'll get here. I think she's underage, so it seems that direct links to her image blog are getting deleted in this thread.

2
SilverCoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let me know if you remember. I've had a relatively difficult time looking for info against the Obama-era green energy deals (and gov funded green energy in general), so would love to check it out.

16
SilverCoyote 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yeah, lot of the same plot points this time around(unlikeable establishment Dem opponent, media comparing Trump to Hitler, screeching left, etc.). That being said, this China/Biden plot twist could be interesting. The sequel is never as memorable as the original, but I'll see how it plays out before writing my review.

2
SilverCoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

Women, we hate em but we love em at the same time haha. Good luck and good hunting fellow pede

21
SilverCoyote 21 points ago +21 / -0

Sounds like the usual comfort-of-post-marriage nagging to me. If it wasn't the white supremacy talk, it would've been something like your hobbies, tone of voice, or how you put away the dishes haha

2
SilverCoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had the same thoughts back when Trump was going over to Russia to have meetings with Putin. The mainstream news immediately denounced his visit as a clear act of treason on the grounds that Russia is and has always been the enemy since the Cold War.

However if you think about it, there's no real reason to still see Putin as an enemy other than "But Russia has always been the #1 big bad". Sure, Russia is a big bully to multiple countries and quite the pain in the ass to deal with sometimes, but they're technically not our enemy. The Cold War ended almost 30 years ago and the international state of affairs has changed and evolved so much since then, but the swamp narrative has stayed the same.

We may not know exactly what the two leaders talked about, but I believe that Trump, as a businessman, looked at the reality of the situation and realized there was some mutual benefit to be had in improving relations with Putin. Paired with his negotiations in NK, Trump totally derailed the swamp's status quo and has taken monumental steps towards greater peace. At this rate, if Trump gets reelected we'll be singing kumbaya on Mars by 2024.

6
SilverCoyote 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look at the difference in hues between the blue walls in the middle of the picture. It's very subtle. If you don't see it, yes you may be a tad colorblind

7
SilverCoyote 7 points ago +8 / -1

All classes at Boulder have been online this semester. If anything, this is encouraging them to attend

4
SilverCoyote 4 points ago +4 / -0

"In the absence of a single, universally-agreed definition of "terrorism," it is a matter of subjective determination as to whether the actions for which Rosenberg was convicted and imprisoned — possession of weapons and hundreds of pounds of explosives — should be described as acts of "domestic terrorism.""

This sounds like a sentence straight out of Babylon Bee. It's even written like a joke with a punchline and everything. Jesus Christ

4
SilverCoyote 4 points ago +4 / -0

If u want to get to big 100, that's about 10 kids with an average of 10 kids each. You best get started on that yesterday

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›