Psyop's imaginary crimes? Do you even know what you're talking about? What imaginary crimes? A military tribunal is not a crime. Gitmo is not a crime. Are you just a complete idiot? So you have to come up with a nonsensical strawmen to attack in order to deflect from the argument? I see how you are now. I have no interest in dealing with someone so disingenuous. If you are a genuine user then you bring shame to our political affiliation.
Your logic completely fell apart here.
"If you think you will get someone to prosecute imaginary crimes"
Didn't you just say the crimes were clear cut?
"when for decades there hasn't been anyone willing to prosecute even simple crimes"
What a hilariously false statement. You actually believe this?
"thank you for showing you haven’t got the slightest clue what the fuck is going on."
How ironic, that the person who cannot comprehend Q, who cannot offer an explanation himself, who makes his own assumptions, would accuse me of not having the slightest clue.
Rich stuff here you only usually see from liberal salt.
It’s more complex than that. Q paints the picture.
Thanks for showing that you haven’t the slightest clue how the Deep State has gotten away with “clear cut cases” for decades now.
“Simple clear cut cases”
-Your own assumption
Nothing is simple about the deep state’s web. Your ridicule of Q hinges on your own faulty assumptions and misunderstanding.
Inaction? Wtf makes you assume inaction? You think absolutely nothing is going on behind the scenes? Are you completely unimaginative or just willfully ignorant?
That’s quite literally THE question Q followers have been trained to CONSTANTLY ask themselves. Shows how much you know about the movement.
Some great humor in that thread actually!
One user: I believe that divorce filing would be under "irreconcilable differences".
Another user in reply: "Irreconcilable similarities"
They sound less like friends and more like objects to be used for company.
I honestly don’t think I could differentiate between that and the sound of an axe hitting wood.
It’s almost like they don’t want us to effectively defend ourself. The line is literally “nope that gun is too effective for you to own” and people think “wow the government cares so much about our well being” somehow for it. This world is headed to the end quick, people are complete idiots anymore. Idiocracy is here.
No experience but I imagine shooting a subsonic small caliber round through a closed action gun with a silencer would be indistinguishable from a gunshot to any normal unsuspecting person.
Key phrase here is “my people, which are called by my name.” His people. The Chosen/Elect. The ones called by His name. Not the ones uncalled for. He didn’t say “if anyone” for a reason.
Stayed at a Hilton a few nights ago and saw a group of black teenagers in cliche thug attire cockily walking around the lobby as I was checking in. Definitely thought it was weird.
I can imagine that they were told that the whole movement is where the population is heading and that they were simply following it for the sales. It’d be easy to believe seeing all the other corps doing the same thing. When we see corps like Netflix digging their heels in and defending their wokeness while taking a huge financial hit for it, it makes me a lot more open minded and forgiving when an even richer corp like Disney says they made a mistake for it when the backlash wasn’t even as bad. It also might all be bullshit seeing as the source is a YouTuber, even if he may have a good track record.
This is a reoccurring theme in Japanese anime. The heroes beat up the bad guys, then the government comes in to take credit and arrest the heroes on some technicality and were actually secretly working with the bad guys the whole time. Japan has an interesting perspective on government corruption, they seem to accept it as an unavoidable symptom of a necessary system.
Not a joke at all, the guy was 100% a revered and sung hero in prison if his conviction got out to the others. There’s much more respect and virtue in prison than most are led to believe.
Unconstitutional to hold a jury responsible for their verdict.
I sometimes consider the fall of Satan from his perspective. He was the highest being, second only to God. Surely nothing would match his intellect other than God. How could he not see his own defeat? It makes me wonder if Satan knew he would never beat God, but was still unable to handle his role as the greatest apart from God. Maybe this is what Satan sees as freedom, this short time he is allowed to defy God. We are told after being cast down from heaven after being defeated, he rages over the earth. Even when met with defeat, he continues, the highest being God ever made.
I think this speaks a lot to the feebleness of man, our total depravity and separation from God. We only know what is good and evil because of the tree we ate from, and now we cannot help ourselves from evil, we must have the Spirit of God to give us the mind of Christ. The greatest created being even chose evil over what is good, even when defeat was certain, all to defy God for the sake of being free from His laws.
It should be argued more that God’s law was designed to free us from sin, not restrict us from freedom.
Take note from Jesus. People would call him an asshole today for insulting and shaming people, calling people whores, serpents, and fools. POTUS is the same, calls people out for what they are. What is wrong with that? Why should we not want to hurt people feelings? Their feelings need to be hurt, because their feelings are wrong and harmful.
Q and Alex Jones are not at all the same, and even then, many people had only ever heard of Alex Jones and then his crazy sound bites if they had at all, not what he actually believes in. Alex Jones just latched onto Q and then went against him. Unlike Alex Jones, Q actually references Bill Cooper, so I accepted that comparison. But yea, upon looking back at the NK post, it wasn’t a prediction at all. I was fooled by that. There’s plenty of others you could address though that could disprove Q’s validity instead of showing my own ineptitude, though I do appreciate it through the challenge.
What was I dishonest about?
Sorry if I’m mistaken in some of my misinterpretations of Q. I’ll admit the McCain one may be a stretch on our part, which is why I had initially worded it as “seemingly” predicted his death. Q never made the claim himself. But it is weird that the death is to the exact minute of the post, one month later, no? Every claim Q has actually made you have not proven or disproven, only ridiculed. Most of your issues are with Q followers believing things to be predictions when they are not, or with things yet to come out. But I think you’re ignoring all of the things that prove his close relationship to POTUS, as shown in the video. I still haven’t heard you address any of that, you’ve only focused on the deep state “claims”.
You’re also ignoring the point of Qs posts that I told you. His purpose isn’t to predict the future for us, and has said himself there will be disinformation necessary. The larger point is to make some doubtable validity for himself while connecting all of the deep state names and actions, tactfully scaring them into spending ammunition. Many of his posts are likely proofs for specific individuals, seeing as how they are obviously triggered into Twitter rants afterwards. It seems like they all think he’s real with how they’ve repeatedly attacked him and his followers platform. Which group of subs went down before the donald on reddit? It was all of the QAnon subs. Why is 8ch now 8kun with a DOD IP address? Q chose the only platform that wouldn’t ban him, and they still tried to censor him by buying their way into the hosting company to drop the website. Lots of effort for them just to defame and censor a LARP.
It is also a record that we will all look back at as proof when all things are done. Future proves past.
I also never said I am a Q expert. That was quite the bold lie you just made. It’s really making me think I’m just wasting my time with an immature punk with an overinflated ego. I really hope you honestly search for the truth. Watch the video I sent you.
Why do you not ever respond to my questions, and instead focus on the one thing you find weak while ignoring the rest? Very disingenuous. Sad and pathetic.
"every dog has its day" implies death. I also never claimed Q was an all-knowing god, but how many coincidences until it stops looking like a LARP?
Bill Cooper was never mainstream, most people have still not heard of him while they have heard of Q. I also never claimed that no one ever knew anything about it at all. Now the news talks about it frequently like they are afraid.
Care to address the rest? Nothing on North Korea?
Good luck with the mental gymnastics getting around everything presented in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKR7Srh3uJI
Trust me, you've never been like me. I would never use strawmen or gaslighting in argument.
Meth actually makes crack obsolete. Crackheads who try meth never go back to crack because it would be absolutely pointless. Meth is cheaper, stronger, lasts longer, and has fewer short-term side effects. I know this from personal experience.