4
Sk0rtch 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's the big problem. Socialism on paper, you would be insane not to. Socialism is practice is the problem and that's what's so hard to get across.

It's all paid by taxes and if the service declines as lobbyists help themselves to more tax money while offering less with no opt out it would be a multigenerational effort to unseat that corruption. The problem isn't so much that corrupt people are not taken down, corrupt people are taken down all the time, but usually through the efforts of other people who play the same game whom want to help themselves to that cashflow rather than to fix the problem.

1
Sk0rtch 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not what this is about seeds have been declared non essential and shut off along with the electronic aisle.
Of course this still warrants debate, but debate about what actually happened.

1
Sk0rtch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think the DPA can be used to cuck the press like that, but still great idea.

1
Sk0rtch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Socislism can absolutely work. Run it as a non profit insurance.
The problem is not that socialism can't work. It can.
The problem is the government takes your money in the form of taxes with no opt out. If the government does not deliver on its promises of healthcare job security the money gets reassigned, missapropriated or downright embezzled through fraud, enabled by kickbacks, donations and what not, what are you gonna do ? You still have to pay those taxes even after interest groups bribe themselves to a frivolous cut of the pie.
So socialism can work, but it will not. That's the problem people are not seeing. We can all be good and nice so we won't have wars anymore and will not weapons anymore, but that is not going to happen. Same problem with socialism.

That is the big problem with socialism and what makes it so enticing. If you look at it just on paper you would be crazy not to.

3
Sk0rtch 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's like when you need to be more like nazi germany. The innovation animal rights and engineering part, not the human rights part.

3
Sk0rtch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Romeo and Juliet laws are great but 10 years is just too much. An 19 year old doinking a 17 year old, okay fine. But a 24 year old porking a 14 year old common.

-1
Sk0rtch -1 points ago +1 / -2

Thats a bit of a reach tbh

-6
Sk0rtch -6 points ago +1 / -7

Nah you don't want to kill an American company because they had woke people do their advertisement. Also Gilette is probably losing money because of the comeback of straights and safety and because they are too darn expensive.

13
Sk0rtch 13 points ago +14 / -1

No they don't want to spark a fucking civil war. They need to make waves to wake up their voters from lethargy, so they are active come election time. Now that in peach is winding down they need a new thing to get their voters to put the bong long enough to bother to vote.

by jarland
4
Sk0rtch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think it was solely due to that. It was also drivers trying to leverage the situation for money and officials decided they rather let a few people die and then bitch about Trump.

1
Sk0rtch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jefferson airplane white rabbit. Ed Buck is a druggy old enough to be a Jefferson Airplane fan.

1
Sk0rtch 1 point ago +1 / -0

A five foot 7 Italian will never portray a 6 foot 3 blonde with German/Scottish heritage ?

2
Sk0rtch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pointing that out is sexist.

view more: Next ›