I really struggle with this and have thought about it for awhile, and changed my mind on the numbers.
If I could magically make these demons not abuse their children with sterilizing drugs and surgeries, their children will breed more woke leftist children which will grow up to oppress me and my children and consume resources.
If on the other hand they continue to abuse their children and sterilize them, their children represent an end to their genetic line, with the risk that their kids grow up to groom mine and make them trannies.
So it is a question of balancing risk.
There is a 71% chance of kids having the same political woke alignment as their parents. So for every 100 leftists that breed, that creates 142 leftists.
On the other hand, the suicide rate for trannies is 0.4%/year, or 20% over an average lifetime. There are 0.58% of people in the US that are trans, and assuming that they grow at 6% a year by grooming. So they're growing faster than they're killing themselves.
Also assume 100% of transgender people vote Democrat.
The current red/blue balance is 29% / 33%, 70% of kids follow their parents' politics, and conservatives outbreed leftists 1.4:1.
So allow 0.58% of Democrats to sterilize themselves, or attempt to stop them, knowing that it will breed more Democrats?
The numbers say allowing them to keep abusing their kids will result in the demographic advantage we have over them closing slightly, but not enough to stave off our eventual demographic victory once we close the borders. Maybe it moves the needle by a year.
Therefore, on balance, it's better to stop Democrats from abusing their children and sterilizing them, even though it results in more Democrats, as the amount of Democrats thereby created is not enough to make a difference in the long run.
I hold forever. When I die, the original debt is against my estate but the stock has grown so much since then it doesn't matter and the estate pays it off. The stock wrapped in a trust passes to my heirs at stepped up basis. They then borrow against it and start the process again, never selling.
As I said below, as a marginally rich person we don't ever sell stock, we borrow against it at 2%, which isn't taxable, and then I can deduct the interest from business revenues. Only the poors ever sell stock and have to pay these usurious taxes.
The funny thing is that this only fucks the poors; rich people like me never sell stock, we borrow against it, and since the loan is fully secured by the stock, the rates are great, on the order of 2% or less these days, and I can make the interest I pay tax deductible if I wrap it in an investment LLC.
Only poor people sell stock and are subject to these rates.
The people up here (Montana) know how to handle this and have been doing so for awhile.
Tip: any group over 3-4 people is a fed honeypot we set up. We moved to cell structures back in the 1990s and haven't really changed. Some people were sad about it that we didn't have big BBQs anymore but those people wanted to drink beer and LARP.
It is useful to note that people were able to rally 1000+ patriots with armor, NODs, and rifles to CDA when antifa came knocking, all without anything but 3 person cells and phone/text trees. Antifa was completely taken by surprise as their government handlers only thought a couple cells were coming.
Also, cell structures don't prevent infiltration, it assumes it and seeks to limit the damage.
Read up on "cell structure organizations" as the Communists have been using it. Commie books are good on this subject.
You can start a cell literally today. Just meet regularly with 2 people you trust, at work or neighbors, discuss the issues of the day. You can meet with other groups of 2, but never more than 3, and don't mix group A and group B. Make plans of action, and decide to execute on them or not.
Yeah, this is shitty but we all knew it was going on.
IMO we don't need gun control, we need people control.
If you can't be trusted with a machinegun or a fragmentation grenade, you should be in an institution, jail, or dead.
I'm an engineering principal at a major Silicon Valley company. Resumes and LinkedIns that contain pronouns get trashed. Too risky to the company that xe/xir will place activism and disruption over doing actual work. We get a thousand resumes for every open position; I'll find someone without pronouns to work with.
No. We reconquer. With tanks.