0
Slavik777 0 points ago +1 / -1

The decrease must be due to the way they are reporting them now, or not reporting them. I mean, sorry cough cough, new administration is doing a great job...

4
Slavik777 4 points ago +5 / -1

What you have said is true and makes sense that it is absurd to be proud of one's own skin color, since at is a mere immutable characteristic that one is born with, however the chart does make a good point that only one group is automatically branded as racist even if they claim it.

4
Slavik777 4 points ago +5 / -1

One only needs to ask who those farmers voted for, and you will get your explanation. Texas district 13.

6
Slavik777 6 points ago +7 / -1

And people laugh at Austrian economists who advocated competition in currency.

30
Slavik777 30 points ago +31 / -1

Sure, you can build a bank, sounds good. One question though. What will you do about regulations that will be used to choke and kill it off? People are still naïve and think that the regulations are setup as a roadmap to play by. The regulations are used to control the economy and to rid of the "wrong" people and businesses.

1
Slavik777 1 point ago +2 / -1

What, they have only now started colluding? Her being there is complete insanity, but them colluding with the government is nothing new, unless she was hired about 100 years ago.

1
Slavik777 1 point ago +3 / -2

Or, simply, welcome to how government works. Also, this is what regulations are used for as well. Considering that with regulations, the hypothetical victim of the business ends up suing the company, and without regulations the hypothetical victim also ends up suing the company, regulations increase costs and are a great vehicle of control to apply pressure by the government on the companies as we can see above.

3
Slavik777 3 points ago +4 / -1

Moral of the story? The right needs to stop allowing the left to be the referee and have referees of our own.

0
Slavik777 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did bankers break the laws or followed them? When the government sets laws such as "we are here to protect you and here is FDIC to protect your savings," in translation, this means that banks are free to speculate as they wish, because government will simply cover any and all loses. Get the government out of business and Banks will simply end up crashing for their practices instead of getting bailouts.

2
Slavik777 2 points ago +4 / -2

And at the very end the moral is "lets ask for more government?" We need regulations? You want unelected regulatory agencies to control this, and after everything we saw, still somehow assume that said regulatory agencies will make sure that this time they will regulate in the direction of freedom?

All of the above mentioned companies became so rich to the point of buying everything out, is due to regulatory capture in other areas. Ask Democrats why they are for regulations? Now, why are you?

Every single regulation and law, makes it harder for the competition to enter the market as costs of entry skyrocket. Never EVER ask the government for help, asking government for help is digging your own grave.

1
Slavik777 1 point ago +2 / -1

Who do you think would be the one deciding it under this doctrine? It would have been a regulatory agency full of the likes of Harris and AOC, oh and they would not be elected by the way but appointed.

0
Slavik777 0 points ago +1 / -1

Government is the LAST people you want to be the arbiters of truth. The answer is NEVER more regulations and regulatory agencies stuffed by AOC's, the answer is removing governments ability to give favors to companies. Separation of business and Government is what we need.

12
Slavik777 12 points ago +13 / -1

A whole bunch of hedge fund elitists were shorting GameStop stock and a group just said f it and all together started to buy GameStop stocks bull rushing it, which drove the stock up and hedge fund elites collectively lost some 14.3 billion in one day. Now that investor group is being kicked off from just about every platform.

21
Slavik777 21 points ago +22 / -1

I give them a lot of slack, they are adding servers, it is not as simple as server farm simply moving them over to already existing servers. They are a completely independent operation.

68
Slavik777 68 points ago +70 / -2

Could be like working for google way back when it just started and have yet to make a deal with the devil?

10
Slavik777 10 points ago +11 / -1

Iam honestly not sure what the point is, it is the government that at the very least allowed them to inflate our currency, and in either way it still needs to be abolished.

2
Slavik777 2 points ago +3 / -1

HAHA, thanks for the comic relief, Im sitting here cringing at this pawfice crap.

Thanks fren lol.

41
Slavik777 41 points ago +42 / -1

I guess we have all forgotten the literal struggle sessions against white kids in schools? They can stay closed forever, we do not need state "education" which is nothing more than Democrat indoctrination.

0
Slavik777 0 points ago +1 / -1

More like one piece of old stale bread.

6
Slavik777 6 points ago +7 / -1

For the time being, I agree completely. The issue is that Libertarian Party has been largely ignored by everyone, as people on the right thought that they can just go with Republicans, while Republican party completely forgot and then ignored all of its established principles. LP is struggling from inviting lefties, there is an internal movement to rid of leftists as of right now.

10
Slavik777 10 points ago +12 / -2

Considering that Constitution and what the founders envision is largely what Libertarians advocate for, I would say it is hardly an only good on paper ideology. As far as who they have elected, well help turn that around by being the right wing Libertarian, at the very least, Libertarians are so much closer to the founding of this nation than any other party out there.

1
Slavik777 1 point ago +2 / -1

Right, otherwise we will not have enough of them to arrest you for not wearing a mask?

view more: Next ›