I never saw it on here. Either I missed it, it was "delayed", it was made but isn't public, or it's made and public but is absolute trash. Can anyone update me? Thanks.
Aren't normal lawsuits like this:
Plaintiff:
Defendant did X so according to Law A, I am entitled to Y
I ask the court to give me Y
Defendant:
Plaintiff cannot prove X and Even if X happened, Law B exempts me so plaintiff is not entitled to anything
I ask the court to dismiss
Court:
The court cannot grant relief of Y because plaintiff has not shown why Law B does not apply
The court does not dismiss for the defendant because there is reasonable evidence that X occurred, but it is unclear whether Law B applies to to defendant
They'll go back and forth, or go to trial, discovery is somewhere in there, before the court decides in someone's favor unless they asked for jury trial initially.
Do courts normally grant relief on the first ask?
I assume we would have known already if any voting software emails were in there by now, but I just wanted to have a look.
Just my two cents. It's unlikely that they are registering dead people to vote on purpose or anything, it's too easy to get caught. It's more likely it's much bigger and widespread and the dead people, maiden names and the like are just accidents, and when these are caught it's obvious but it's not a big number so it's not "wide spread" etc...
What is probably occurring is that XXX ballots are pre-filled and when they arrived they have to be allocated to a "registered voter" in the system. You can't just pick a random registered voter who hasn't voted, because if you do that for 100K people, there'll be too many complaints when people show up to vote. So what do you do? Register dummy voters so you have a list of registered voters to allocated your fraudulent ballots to.
So how do you make up fake voter registrations without it being too obvious? Thinking up 100,000 fake fn, ln, and addresses probably won't be easy or work, but if you had a list of previous voter registrations, then you can use former genuine ones so they look fairly legit. So Find a list of former registrations and compare it to the list of current ones, using only the ones unique to the old list, and now you have a good list to use for your fake ballots after you register them. This is much easier to do with fewer people than manually finding dead people to register.
You're doing this on a mass scale, so of course some of the old voter registrations did not renew because they're dead or changed names or something. And then there's the people that registered later and saw "oh, looks like I'm already registered", and find out later they already voted. The thing is, even if those get caught and discarded, you still win because that's only a tiny minority of all the fraudulent ballots and won't affect the outcome. That's always the reasoning for not having "widespread" voter fraud. If you make it so widespread you fake tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of votes, the 1% that have issues won't affect the outcome.
TL;DR
Rather than assuming people are cheating by registering dead voters, it's much more likely a list of formerly registered voters are being registered en masse to cheat, some of which happen to have died. If the obvious ones are caught, it's just a small fraction and likely won't affect the outcome, at least that's the idea.
Just my two cents. It's unlikely that they are registering dead people to vote on purpose or anything, it's too easy to get caught. It's more likely it's much bigger and widespread and the dead people, maiden names and the like are just accidents, and when these are caught it's obvious but it's not a big number so it's not "wide spread" etc...
What is probably occurring is that XXX ballots are pre-filled and when they arrived they have to be allocated to a "registered voter" in the system. You can't just pick a random registered voter who hasn't voted, because if you do that for 100K people, there'll be too many complaints when people show up to vote. So what do you do? Register dummy voters so you have a list of registered voters to allocated your fraudulent ballots to.
So how do you make up fake voter registrations without it being too obvious? Thinking up 100,000 fake fn, ln, and addresses probably won't be easy or work, but if you had a list of previous voter registrations, then you can use former genuine ones so they look fairly legit. So Find a list of former registrations and compare it to the list of current ones, using only the ones unique to the old list, and now you have a good list to use for your fake ballots after you register them. This is much easier to do with fewer people than manually finding dead people to register.
You're doing this on a mass scale, so of course some of the old voter registrations did not renew because they're dead or changed names or something. And then there's the people that registered later and saw "oh, looks like I'm already registered", and find out later they already voted. The thing is, even if those get caught and discarded, you still win because that's only a tiny minority of all the fraudulent ballots and won't affect the outcome. That's always the reasoning for not having "widespread" voter fraud. If you make it so widespread you fake tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of votes, the 1% that have issues won't affect the outcome.
TL;DR
Rather than assuming people are cheating by registering dead voters, it's much more likely a list of formerly registered voters are being registered en masse to cheat, some of which happen to have died. If the obvious ones are caught, it's just a small fraction and likely won't affect the outcome.
All of the early mail-in ballots are just being tallied by stated party received, not who they voted for correct? I never bothered switching mine. If that's the case, all of the estimates are going to be off, because 94%+ Reps are voting for Trump, but the same can't be said for registered Democrats.
Is that the case, or are they actually opening ballots and counting votes?
Yesterday I saw something about DOJ or FBI making an announcement at 11am Eastern but I missed it and don't see anything about it on thedonald. Did they reschedule it or was it garbage?
Yesterday my roommate had some normie people over to watch football and have a little house party of about 10 people. Everyone was in their 20s or early 30s, everyone was voting for Trump,
I had to explain the laptop from hell issue to them because no one knew anything about Hunter Biden's laptop or what was on it. Zero. Media suppression seems to be working on your average person, even if they're voting for Trump.
Is it that bad or are we just like a week ahead on here?