1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess it's easier to buy than them making their money that way than the mediocre games they put out. I hadn't heard about Ubisoft being a deep state front before though

-3
Smurfy -3 points ago +1 / -4

Isn't it that masks are supposed to stop you spreading rather than stop you catching? Don't shoot the messenger though

1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, what is the likely fraud.

It is the MSM that is trying to edit this data to pressure Trump into a concession?

Or is it the MSM is being given fraudulent data from ballot counting stations?

Edit. Oh and most important thing I'm confused about. What is happening when it switches. A person is writing in new information and deleting the old one?

1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, so what does Edison data mean. It's like a hacked link to the Dominion code or something?

Oh and what does it mean that votes switched. The program is coded to switch a certain amount of votes? What does it mean when they are lost etc?

1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think China do know they are being hypocritical here. I don't think they actually give a fuck. This isn't worth the publicity you are giving it.

3
Smurfy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can anyone smart explain this to a dumbass like me. I've no idea what any of this means

Edit.

So if I understand right it's the news that had the glitches? So this means what, that the news was given the correct data from the voting, but then they changed it themselves but the voting peeps kept silent? So it's the news that has been the perpetrators and the actual voting is ok?

The news isn't directly linked to the counting is it? I'm so confused lol

Or is it news and all the voting places in coordination together?

1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh shit. That's big. So likewise you can just change your name and revote multiple times in every state?

You think they'd link it to your social security or summit. Obviously going to cause issues just linking it to one name. Guess that might be by design. Do you have to submit your social security on mail voting? In which case should be easy peazy to find these. Nice

1
Smurfy 1 point ago +1 / -0

So basically it's unequivocal evidence, why is no one hammering this point?

6
Smurfy 6 points ago +6 / -0

This boy's got some amount of energy, kept that high octane shit up for over 2 hours very impressive

2
Smurfy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't he smuggle a few out? Like stuff em down his trousers or something?

Wouldn't it basically just prove it straight up, cause you'd find one with the same number etc that is now Dem and can validate it's authentically printed?

2
Smurfy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone who understands politics at all. Or basically every single big organisation, business or movement. Trump understands about PR which is why he bothers to make speeches and tweets

by Satou
7
Smurfy 7 points ago +8 / -1

But, didn't they vote for us, but election fraud. Why'd you prove they did vote then set them on fire lol.

by 1moa
2
Smurfy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok I understand, we remove them because they are old and going to die soon anyway?

by 1moa
2
Smurfy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Numbers are probably completely made up. But Covid isn't anywhere near as low as 0.00004% is it?

view more: ‹ Prev