1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think you can always see your own posts. Not sure why, I've had a couple posts in rising and wasn't able to see them. They're not censoring you, I can see your post.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +2 / -4

Yeah, because if I don't align with "your" view of supporting a movement, I shouldn't be here.

You kinda sound like another group of people in the political spectrum right now...

I'm not "picking fights" with anyone, I mostly respond to comments on my own posts or my own comments ( feel free to check ). If responding to others is "fighting", I get the feeling you'd rather others not be allowed to speak unless they agree with you...who does that sound like?

I've got a crazy idea, why not use DISCOURSE to SHOW ME your view is more legitimate as opposed to writing off my statements.

So again, I ask. Why is the poster from the image a "bad actor"? Is it because he doesn't agree with you, and you're "right", and only "right" people should be allowed to support Trump?

4
Snapplebrisk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rules for thee (patriots), but not for me (The uni-party/elites).

Stephan Molyneux has a great video describing this exact concept. There is a rule, but there is always an exception that is not allowed to be discussed.

Joe Biden truly believes what he is saying, but what he doesn't say is that he is the exception.

A question: "How do you create a society without exceptions to the rule?"

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +4 / -3

I see, apparently your plan is to downvote the comment history of anyone who disagrees with you. Lol, I'm sure that's gonna help things.

If I didn't know any better I'd say you were trying to censor thoughts and ideas. I believe it best not to become the thing you despise.

-1
Snapplebrisk -1 points ago +3 / -4

Feel free, I'm no bad actor. I want the truth to come out.

I don't look at life through MAGA red glasses. I support Trump, but I'm not deluding myself into thinking he's gonna wave a magic wand this time and make it all go away.

Prior to this point, I was closer to "Maybe there's something he can do". Now though, I'm not seeing a path moving forward for Trump to take the presidency, even though I support him.

So, all I ask is for people to stop waiting for someone else to do something. There are things you can do as an individual to help.

I like to point out that this website didn't magically appear. Granted, it did for most the people reading this ( you lucked out and someone else built it ). The owners built this platform for us to discuss ALL things related to the movement. That includes the possibility that no one with "great authority" is coming to save you.

You're going to have to be creative and do something to help if you want to change things. I would love to "trust the plan", at this point though, I know that I need to do something to help.

I do have an idea of how I can help, it just doesn't seem like something most people on this board would want to discuss.

0
Snapplebrisk 0 points ago +4 / -4

Aside from character assasination (without evidence mind you), prove he's a bad actor. Maybe he's a realist and you are hoping that someone else is gonna save you. What if no one save you, what then?

You don't have to provide specifics, you don't have to tell anyone what your going to do, but you should probably have a plan if things go south. Just sayin.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

I never said I had a plan. That wasn't the topic of the post. No, I don't have to tell you the specifics of my own plan, if I even have one yet. Maybe I'm not done thinking yet. Maybe I am. In the end, I don't have to answer your question, and you've not demonstrated the ability to refute my initial statement (multiple times).

Instead you have attempted character assassination and repeatedly asked an irrelevant question. Finally, you've chosen to try and "deport me" because I'm asking you to discuss the topic of the post.

I repeatedly ask for debate of the topic at hand, and you refuse. Instead you need to know "my plan".

I want everyone to make their own plans. No, we don't have to share them. No, we don't have to teleprompt our actions.

Again, I ask you to refute my initial statement from this post. I'll wait.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

Look who's dodging questions now... Come on, I know you can rub those last two brain cells together and do better than that. If i didn't know any better I'd say you were a glowie. But, you're not even putting any effort in now, so maybe you just really want to believe "someone else is gonna fix this for me".

My post just asks you to be creative, and try to solve the problems were facing. I'm not providing specific guidance, or actions.

Is there something you didn't like about my initial statement? What didn't you like? Tell me.

-1
Snapplebrisk -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why do you need to know?

What intent lies behind your line of questioning?

Why would I tell a stranger on the internet what my actions in the future are? What benefit would it serve?

Why do you need to know.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

However, you have no evidence of hipocracy. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

It's almost like your trying to gather evidence or something, weird.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yes, character assassination.

You can't refute my statements on their merit, so instead you attack the source of the information.

I.E. :"You're harming your own message."- Irony

Again, I am asking everyone who reads the message to make their own plans. No, we don't have to share them. No, I am not asking to have a unified plan. Everyone should determine their own path, I am just asking that everyone think about what they can do, make a plan, and try to do something.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

As I replied to "another" poster.

I must have said something that upset you.

What's interesting is that instead of addressing the abstract points I made, you're attempting character assassination. Your asking for specifics about me and for specific actions so that you can articulate an argument against singular action points.

Again, I am providing a simple message. The most common lie told is "someone else will fix this for me." I am providing guidance, "Don't lie to yourself".

I would rather everyone make their own plans. No, we don't have to share them. No we don't have to teleprompt actions prior to them happening. No I don't have to discuss specifics, deal with it.

-2
Snapplebrisk -2 points ago +1 / -3

I must have said something that upset you.

What's interesting is that instead of addressing the abstract points I made, you're attempting character assassination. Your asking for specifics about me and for specific actions so that you can articulate an argument against singular action points.

Again, I am providing a simple message. The most common lie told is "someone else will fix this for me." I am providing guidance, "Don't lie to yourself".

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know how to convey this, but I'll try. We are all human, as a human we are the most intelligent species on the planet. So, in comparison to everything else that exists, if we fall into the category "human" were smarter.

Now, within this category there is a normal distribution for intelligence, and it's just not THAT BIG a distribution. There aren't "evil geniuses" & "4-d Chess Grandmasters". There will be people who want you to think that, but it's a relatively simple charade.

The vast majority of differences among peoples social status, social class, and social standing are due to factors outside of their control. Unless you are highly focused on a singular goal, these social factors are unlikely to change.

Trump is a good honest man. He's like us. He doesn't use underhanded methods to accomplish his goals, I've seen that usually he trusts people to "do the right thing". It's a tactic the establishment wasn't used to, because they blackmail, make backroom deals, and use "dirty" tactics

He wanted all of those people to do something to help him, wouldn't you? I wanted the Durham report, DNI report, electoral votes sent back for recertification, courts to provide discovery, and intelligence agencies to provide damming Intel. I want what I believe the irrefutable truth to be known. There's a lot of data points to suggest something underhanded happened, that haven't been thoroughly addressed.

Instead, everything has been "swept under the rug". More simply put, THEY LIE. It's the oldest trick in the book, and the hardest one to beat.

Look at Pence, "we will have our day in Congress". He LIED to Trump.

It's a big club, and you ain't in it. Neither was he.

Now, there is only one lie left. The one everyone tells themselves, "someone else is gonna fix this for me". Don't lie to yourself. Know where you stand, make a plan, and work towards that singular goal.

P.s. your plan doesn't have to be one of a "good man", we've seen where that gets us. The oldest stories mankind has always points to a singular truth. Good (God) allows evil to exist, in hopes evil will change it's ways. Good doesn't destroy evil, because destruction is an evil act. I'm tired of reasoning, it's time for a new brand of evil.

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because you can't just walk into the temple and start flipping the tables. They do business there. More Whip-Control!

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prior to the information revolution everything you consumed was "newsworthy" and had been given a spin you couldn't logically object to without evidence. If you did you were a "conspiracy theorist"/"nut". Now, there's a camera in every hand, a camera on every corner, and the ability to think independently of big media.

These power players are actively working on censorship for a reason, they know without it their fucked in the long-term.

Death to tyrants. Death to Technocrats.

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +4 / -3

Shine so bright, my little glowie.

Hide in plain sight, my little glowie.

You'll find people in time,

who play along and rhyme.

But, you'll always shine! My little Glowie!

by Bullelk
1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right will be wrong, and wrong will be right. These people cannot leave their delusion. They believe "all dogs go to heaven", and that the mutts in Congress would never bite them.

They would rather believe that their leaders are not humans. Humans are capable of great evil, especially under the right circumstamces. Be it blackmail, or indulgence, these people serve a master other than the people of the u.s.

0
Snapplebrisk 0 points ago +1 / -1

IDK, that last tweet video was, to my eye, very suspect. I felt like the audio didn't match his lips very well, and the cadence he talks in was abnormal. Something going on with the fat around his face too. If it's just him alone on screen, I'm pretty sure I'm right.

3
Snapplebrisk 3 points ago +3 / -0

They won't call it a civil war. They'll call it "terrorism", they've had lots of practice dealing with "terrorism". They've been developing fighting tactics to deal with "insurgents" with small arms for a very long time in Sandy countries. They want this.

2
Snapplebrisk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, it's harvest time. Only question is wether it's our fields, or them.

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be prepared to play board games and be without power. If taken literally it means no electricity. If taken figuratively though...it looks like we have no (political power) and in board games pieces get moved around the board, strategy.

Why isn't his Twitter account being taken down, seriously? Seems very strange to me his account hasn't been suspended.

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see a lot of people giving flack to someone who has actually compiled real evidence and has a conclusion of concern. Yeah, I can see she's having trouble finding the right words to convey her message.

It would be better if she wasn't trying to create a "buzzword", of "medical sorcery". She's not wrong though.

People should be concerned about injecting a mutated ( cancerous/oncogenic) line of cells into their body. Your immune system is very sensitive, and gets "confused" when something very similar to your own dna is presented.

This leads to auto-immune disorders. Hey, let's make fun of her though instead of address her concerns, what's the worst that could happen?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›