2
Snerdley 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point, I firmly believe our democracy, courts, and our constitution are no longer the rule in this Republic. As such, our way of life has forever changed. Our choice now, is to accept this new CCP rule in America, or throw off the sham of democracy, and follow this President, REGARDLESS of perceived departure from the recent norms of recent presidents, and support his use of Martial Law and Military Courts to cleanse our nation. I would normally oppose such a departure, but accepting a Harris win, will not return us to normalcy. Our best chance is with Trump.

2
Snerdley 2 points ago +3 / -1

who's Daniel ccovino JR? His son is there?

3
Snerdley 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://gofile.io/d/Jo8W92

512mb, csv. 1.95M lines. Treat it with care though, it did originate in Chi-Na after all.

1
Snerdley 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would choose a dual, like Hamilton-Burr. I don't think Biden can out draw Trump.

2
Snerdley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where's Barron's head??

4
Snerdley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Robbed a bank but the only evidence is an empty vault! Ha! You can't prove a crime occured because you can't prove I did it! Checkmate!

6
Snerdley 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is the OBJECTION VOTE by state delegation? Or by majority of the house?

I understand the contested election vote is by state delegation.

1
Snerdley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our gop is too cucked and busy making wear-a-mask commercials with dems..

4
Snerdley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Please provide a source link? Can't get some people to belive media.thedonald.win as authorative (yet). Thx

14
Snerdley 14 points ago +14 / -0

Every fraudulent vote disenfranchises a legal vote, so 169k potentially fraudulent votes is also 169k disenfranchised legal votes. There is MORE EVIDENCE the "indefinitely confined" votes are the fraudulent ones than any legal vote were fraudulent. This can be better said as re-enfranchising 169k legal votes that were defrauded by the 169k "indefinitely confined votes"

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›