4
SnowflakeJuice 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is some terrifying shit. Another virus, as contagious as this one, but slightly more potent, could cause the collapse of modern society, if they respond in a similiar manner and create as much panic, as they did with this one.

5
SnowflakeJuice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seems like a lot of people here feel the same way, that is the only way to make sense out of the nonsensical support she is getting here

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got 2 points. The Dems have succeeded because they control the cultural narrative. A lot of the Dems strength and appeal for Socialism is because they have destroyed the nuclear family.

  1. Dudes are not females, at some point, sanity needs to reign supreme.
4
SnowflakeJuice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty sure the founding fathers agreed unanimously that females do not have dicks

9
SnowflakeJuice 9 points ago +10 / -1

Nothing bullshit about this post . Noem vetoed it and the only reason she gave for 2 weeks was because of the fallout with the NCAA.

This bill was debated for 10 weeks and not a peep out of her. It took 2 weeks for her to identify the language she supposedly had trouble with.

As far as Noem and this site is concerned, the issue is too many people simping for her.

RINO'S are crafty chameleanes rarely showing their stripes until it is too late. In this case Noem let the cat out of the bag and exposed herself. Just like Ted Cruz with his flip flopping on TPP.

These people can be allies, but never should be fully trusted. I can count the politicians I trust on 2 hands or less. Jim Jordan, Louis Gohmert, Matt Geatz, Ron Desantis, a few more, but not many.

7
SnowflakeJuice 7 points ago +8 / -1

Why didn't she request that when they were working on the bill, why did it take her weeks to list her specific problems with it?

8
SnowflakeJuice 8 points ago +9 / -1

It took her 2 weeks after she vetoed the bill to come up with an excuse why she didn't like it

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then why couldn't Noem site the specific issues she had with the bill 2 weeks ago? Why didn't she work with the legislature to craft the bill instead of waiting for the 2.5 month process to be finished before issuing a veto?

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, not a left winger. Noem is full of shit. She never bothered to provide input into writing the bill while it spent 2.5 months in the legislative proccess.

Even as little as 2 weeks ago, the best she could come up with on rejecting the bill is that it would expose her state to retribution from the NCAA, and she didn't want to fight them alone but wanted to be part of a coalition of states.

Maybe in the end some of her lawyers found some bad language, but that doesn't have jackshit to do with why she vetoed it, and at the time she couldn't even site any specific language she opposed.

She is a bullshitter politician and you fell for it hook line and sinker

5
SnowflakeJuice 5 points ago +6 / -1

It took Noem 2 weeks to figure out why she opposed the bill.

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +4 / -2

They were members of Congress, Noem went out of her way to attend.

6
SnowflakeJuice 6 points ago +6 / -0

If I had a vote, it would be for Dr. Faggot Tranny. May as well go full ClownShow

6
SnowflakeJuice 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm betting Maisy Hirono, she is the only person dumb enough to make Kamala seem smart

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You were the one that justified Hitler starting WW2, if you want to make an outrageous assertion like that, I think the burden of evidence falls on you. As a rule, changing the status quo requires justification of it, not maintaining it

8
SnowflakeJuice 8 points ago +8 / -0

They still need guns, the U.S. isn't going to stop them for being arrested for mean tweets

11
SnowflakeJuice 11 points ago +11 / -0

All the EuroCucks are out in full force on Twitter calling for a ban of guns in the U.S. Jeolous little sheep

-1
SnowflakeJuice -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yes Ukraine had election s, yes there were protests, yes security forces cracked dow, that does not make it, nor was it a crackdown on ethnic Russians.

It was Sovereign Ukrainan territory. Russia wanted it because of their naval base being there.

0
SnowflakeJuice 0 points ago +2 / -2

Lets start with your first sentence "The invasion of the Crimea was in response to anti-Russian sentiment targeting the ethnic Russians who lived there." How were "ethnic Russians in Crimea" targeted in a way that would justify an foreign invasion?

Do you have any examples or evidence of that? you do know that was also Hitlers supposed justification for kicking off WW2

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I strongly agree that globalists are a problem, China is a bigger problem right now and they both have common interests

As far as weakening Russia, Putin is responsible for weakening them economically. Appropriating privately held and publicly traded companies destroyed their economy other than natural resources

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›