5
SobekRa 5 points ago +5 / -0

For 2 months I argued about election fraud with people I know, pointlessly. Recently we got heated up again and I just begged to please speak their mind, lay it all out, I want to understand their point of view for real.

They realize the election was stolen. They don't like Biden either, they realize he is senile and a front for someone/something else, most likely big tech governemt. BUT, it's fine and justified because it gets rid of Trump and are convinced the world will be a better place for that, because he is dangerous and dictatorial.

Now, as terrible, uninformed, ironic and antidemocratic as this is, I was grateful to them for dropping the wokeness and fake values and letting me in their world. We could finally relate to something : speaking freely and not embellishing our true thoughts with bullshit we both know to be fake and a distraction at best

Now I'm convinced that after hearing themselves saying the stuff out loud, the irony of enforcing the thing they claimed to fighting will not be lost on some of them. At the very least, when they go back to spouting wokeness, they will have the nagging feeling of knowing they're talking out of their ass

I don't want people to agree with me. Or my values. I just want the truth so we can see what we got and work from there.

I will say, their despise for democracy is worrying and erodes the key pillar of a fair and just society. That is a huge step back in civilization sadly.

They're not even bad people, simply too squared to think outside the boundaries of media. Very sad

3
SobekRa 3 points ago +3 / -0

The reason we're in this situation, is that people believe 'brands', be it news channels or people, and judge the message accordingly. It should be exactly the opposite way.

I think media and the far left are so full of hubris right now that even their staunchest supporters can get a glimpse of the con

8
SobekRa 8 points ago +8 / -0

Quick test to judge info credibility. Is the news censored?

YES= it's true

NO= it's propaganda

Free and more accurate than a coof rapid test that's for sure

7
SobekRa 7 points ago +7 / -0

The swamp is too deep, no honest person can cross it

57
SobekRa 57 points ago +57 / -0

At this stage, even your shadow could be a traitor

Maybe the future is just people all backstabbing and robbing each other forever while getting rich as fuck, on Mars

1
SobekRa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only thing you can't bail on is the Constitution

2
SobekRa 2 points ago +3 / -1

Exercise due skepticism with private equity types that live on staple diet of yachts and 5k hotel rooms

Doesn't necessarily mean they're full of shit, but you won't notice when they switch from informative to deceptive... the finesse

Look at facts, follow the money, join the dots, don't be hustled

2
SobekRa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great find. Watch what they do not what they say

3
SobekRa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like and subscribe for public executions

9
SobekRa 9 points ago +9 / -0

Economic damage covertly targeted at small retail businesses

Everything that directly or incidentally benefits from online has gone ballistic. The ccp virus was the perfect excuse to wipe out a fragmented unorganized segment of the economy and acquire all their mass of revenue

The internet is required to keep the gravy train going, not least for indoctrination and brainwashing. It's the main pillar keeping the whole circus act up. Shutting it down could have unpredictable consequences

If they do it, you know they're ultra desperate that's for sure

10
SobekRa 10 points ago +10 / -0

Shutting down the internet would send people crazy across the board, making them uncontrollable. Not to mention the unthinkable economic damage, and the precedent. I don't think it's realistic for more than a day, and that would already be a huge deal

39
SobekRa 39 points ago +39 / -0

Very good plan B for Europeans that are not down with the globalist agenda

16
SobekRa 16 points ago +16 / -0

Watch the inauguration on Jan 20

32
SobekRa 32 points ago +32 / -0

Trump live streams are already 100k+ before he's even entered the room, consistently

I've seen 2k people on the live chat 24 hours BEFORE the event even started

2
SobekRa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tried to think of other events that compared for scale and intensity in the context of internet and social media at the time. What have I missed?

I know the press and TV have been at it for ages

2
SobekRa 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • Emotional content

  • Woke activism

  • Dodgy organizers (the main guy was a staunch Christian in public and a raging gay methhead behind the scenes)

  • Weaponization of fame and public brainwashing on a large extent

  • Carefully crafted PR and technical expertise to make the thing go viral while retaining a grassroots vibe

  • The whole thing crashed and burned shortly after it was praised, victim of its own fame

I'm convinced occult powers gained a lot of expertise with this experiment, on how to use social media for the purposes of manipulating the public.

This thing got 100mil views in a matter of days, back then it was unheard of. And more importantly, by the end of the documentary the viewer was cool with military actions, foreign invasions (it was peak Obama time after all) etc.

Not questioning anything, just throw money and support behind the 'good guys'

Now obviously I'm not justifying a warlord that recruits children, Kony was probably a huge piece of shit that deserved his day. But.... With so many pieces of shit roaming the corridors of power... Why him in particular?

view more: Next ›