1
SocialMeritWarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not as topical as election stuff, but every news outlet needs a little diversity in their stories, right?

I'd like to see stuff on nuclear power! There's exciting pushes happening to bring our country kicking and screaming into the future.

It was just this September that the NRC (Nuclear Regulator Comission) approved the first SMR (Small Modular Reactor) nuclear power plant in the US!

https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/nrc-approves-first-us-small-modular-reactor-design

Madi Czerwinski (https://twitter.com/Madi_Czerwinski) just launched Campaign for a Green Nuclear Deal yesterday! Her announcement is here: https://medium.com/campaign-for-a-green-nuclear-deal/campaign-for-a-green-nuclear-deal-forging-a-new-america-acf812a603e5

Other notable figures that would be a great interview on the same topic:

Mark Schneider - https://twitter.com/subschneider

Mike Shellenberger - https://twitter.com/shellenbergermd

2
SocialMeritWarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but, like, to do anything she'd have to open them up, fill out the ballots, sign using the other person's name, seal them up, and mail them back. Like, who has the time for all of that?

1
SocialMeritWarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, makes sense that he'd be cautious of counting out Trump.... Putin should be familiar enough with election fraud to tell something is up.

2
SocialMeritWarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unlike a certain "esteemed" Senator from that state, this, fellow PEDES, is what fucking DRAGON ENERGY looks like.

1
SocialMeritWarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been screaming about our shitty, insecure, and most importantly unaccountable voting software since the debacle of Diebold voting machines all the way back in fucking 2000. Those machines were easily hackable. We're talking things like totally unsecured USB ports and more; compromisable within seconds.

RELEVANT:

Most Pa. voting machines are old, hackable, and will likely be used to count the 2020 votes (article from 2018)

2
SocialMeritWarrior 2 points ago +4 / -2

The only place I've seen anyone talk about more people voting than being registered was in Wisconsin. There were 2 problems with that claim: 1. it used registration data from last year, and 2. Wisconsin allows same-day registration (for both early voting and election day).

Now I have seen talk about up to 90+% voter turnout in other places (I've not personally verified this), which is again suspicious - participation is usually more like 40 - 60% - but also not by itself evidence of fraud.

10
SocialMeritWarrior 10 points ago +14 / -4

NO, it's just a place to start investigating. It's routine for places to neglect (unlawfully) purging their rolls. It doesn't mean there was fraud, just yet another potential avenue. Many are actually red counties.

1
SocialMeritWarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I've been ranting about the poor computer security of our election and voting machines since the Diebold fiascos in 2000. Here's just one Diebold story: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm

1
SocialMeritWarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

This actually appears like it may be correct. Here is an earlier tweet from this Matt Smith guy stating they are exporting the results of the count onto a drive.

https://twitter.com/mattsmith_news/status/1323910353391157248

7
SocialMeritWarrior 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly! Pay attention to PRIMARIES in the future! But NOW a RINO is better than nothing because with a CLEAR MANDATE of HOUSE, SENATE, and PRESIDENCY we can bully the RINOs into cooperation.

6
SocialMeritWarrior 6 points ago +6 / -0

This. Getting 4 more years is critical, but voting in Rs (even if they are swampy) in the Senate and the House is like BUILDING A WALL against the radical left. If you don't like your R, then pay attention NEXT PRIMARY. TOMORROW we need to BUILD. THAT. WALL.

view more: ‹ Prev