1
SovereigntyNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

When righties try it it looks even more ridiculous and instead of the left victim worshippers falling for ut they flip over immediately into victim blamers and bashers.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Zzzz @ "LiBruLs R tHe ReAl RaCiStS."

Is their focus on removing black branding ridiculous and hypocritical? Of course it is. Does their form of anti-racism unwittingly lead to both anti-white and de facto anti-black racism? Yes.

Is it believable that liberals actually don't want blacks or "POC" anywhere they go? No, nonsense. They're well-meaning useful idiots who don't understand the price of their compassion being misspent by their cynical and outright evil leaders who enjoy posing as saviors.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because it was written after they came true, of course, and then put in Franklin's mouth.

And of course there is no need for imaginative ad hominem, especially with someone trying to help you.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ive.studied the jewish problem for most of my adult life. Benjamin Franklin quotes are all fake.except a comment he made.about a dutch jewish banker he had approachrd to help finance the revolution.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've read virtually everything there is to read on them. They may very well be at the top of the food chain; if they aren't then they are representatives of those who are.

But that does not make this patent an issue. Actually, the opposite - mixing up false nothingburgers with the truth tarnishes it.

5
SovereigntyNow 5 points ago +6 / -1

Untrue, you are getting confused by the priority date. He patented a system for wearablr.device based medical data collection in 2015, and in 2020 filed for a patent based on his earloer filing.

There is literally nothing to ser here. If you want to make a real case for Rothschild involvement you will need something else.

8
SovereigntyNow 8 points ago +9 / -1

Why is this bad?

They need DDoS protection.

As a citizen, would you rather have your government in the middle or Russia?

What needs protection against Russia are legitimate state and technological secrets. Wtf do I care if Russia reads what i want to say, so long as i can actually fucking say it?

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't understand the Pence hate.

I don't like the guy, he's just one more scummy politician to me, but I read the Constitution. It sounds to me like people expected him to do something that is not actually supported by the Constitution.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've seen a stat in the past that 1℅ get reported

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

The number of deaths is certainly higher than is reported but no, i am saying that these stata do not say, as it has been taken here, that 2.37℅ of the people who take the vaccine die.

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +3 / -3

You understand that you don't need to endorse mistaken interpretations to see that they're underreporting deaths and other adverse events, right?

0
SovereigntyNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

A tiny fraction of adverse events get reported.

Of those that do get reported, they are proportionately more likely to be more serious.

111
SovereigntyNow 111 points ago +115 / -4

OP and most of you guys are reading this wrong.

This is percentage of reported adverse events.

A number of people will get the vaccine.

A subset of those people will have adverse events.

A subset of those people will report them (or be reported on by medical authorities).

2.37% of this subset have died.

I do not support the vaccine. But let's be reasonable in our criticisms.

3
SovereigntyNow 3 points ago +5 / -2

Soldiers are mostly honorable. The brass is not.

It's not the fault of the naive and trusting soldiery that they've been misspent.

4
SovereigntyNow 4 points ago +5 / -1

Thank you for saying this. We should notice the issues being pointed out with disproportionate black criminality and other problems, but the tone we take shouldn't make less of them or us.

i also agree with other posters though that whites have become the only unprotected group in political discourse and subsequent policy.

We should also take care that in pursuing the best interests of blacks we aren't aping the left's pandering act for kudos. And that it isn't a disproportionate fuss while whites go under the bus.

I don't care about advancing white interests in particular but I do care about protecting people from that kind of attack. We need to advance both black interests and white interests in harmony as American interests. God knows the lapdog left won't and can't.

view more: Next ›