A new presidential precedent set by the president?
The ultimate, and only, failure of capitalism: It works too well.
Is that some kind of food?
People need to realize it's ok to admit that every policy position Biden holds isn't bad and still realize he would make a terrible president, has dementia, and is a racist pedophile.
And if Joe did really say that he would do that there's still nothing wrong with asking for a source.
But I guess downvotes are easier than intellectual consistency and proving your claims/even replying in the first place.
you do not know how close she is.
Neither do you. But we can guess.
The people in this image (https://imgur.com/a/EF7L4m3) look about the same as RBG does in the above image. Like they're almost right on top of the President, albeit slightly smaller/far away looking, just like RBG and the podium she's behind looks.
When you look from another angle it becomes clear they're not even slightly close. (https://imgur.com/a/KmbNJ1Q)
Now we can assume RBG is a fair bit closer based on the type of event but it's easy to see that she could be plenty far away and we have no real way of telling without a different photo.
But they still vote.
"if the police would stop enforcing the law for black people the black crime rate would go down"
Now do COVID testing.
Trump hired sessions and trusted him. So it follows that Q would say something similar at the time.
Agreed. It's crazy how we're forced to think in terms of "how is the corrupt, lying, America hating media going to spin this totally ok thing/what are they going to try and claim is mainstream opinion when it's not?". Fortunately, it seems more and more people are waking up from their bullshit and realizing just what the media in this country stands for.
Why should a bunch of retards give the normal people a bad name? That's like saying the KKK claiming to support Trump gives Trump a bad name. It doesn't.
Address people as individuals instead of assuming shit about them based on other people's actions.
This is leftist talk. "You're only disagreeing with me because you're too prideful to backtrack and admit I was right all along and that I have an inordinate amount of evidence to prove it."
Meanwhile, your evidence is half-baked, at best.
The probability of something happening doesn't change because it's happened multiple times. So the chance of multiple similar things happening being coincidences doesn't go down just because they happen a lot.
As for "coincidences "this" coincidental", big coincidences happen all the time and plenty of them can seem like overwhelming evidence of something more, despite the fact they're not.
There's also the fact Trump did NOT quote Q "word for word" or say the "exact same line". Trump made a very similar sentiment that was worded quite differently.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you're wrong. I find the way Trump responded to the Q question potentially indicative of something more. And the fact he did convey the same sentiment specifically when asked about Q is very interesting. I don't know if he's made the comment before but he could have said "If America falls, the world falls" whenever he wanted but he specifically said it when asked about Q. It's also entirely possible he just worded it slightly differently so he wasn't completely quoting the original comment as a way to let his followers know but try and keep the media in the dark or prevent "TrUmP dIReCtLy QuOtEs Q rEEEEE" from blowing up on social media.
My only problems are the claim that people only disagree or have a different opinion because they're just being "prideful" and refusing to backtrack, as well as the "mounting evidence" being insubstantial and not really proving anything.
Username checks out.
Looks like they forgot the orange filter in the second pic.
I'm logged in and still can't see it. Get the same "tweet unavailable" message.
Plenty of them know exactly what they're doing, they just don't care because they're rarely punished.
You don't know the god damn plan, so how can you comment on how well it's going?
Apparently they let him go. Honk honk.
The Obama economy is back, comrades.
Be based, get graced?
Become based, be embraced?
What's so hard for people to understand as to why the brand is being limited instead of just beans in general? Beans aren't in short supply, Goya beans are. The store is giving everyone the chance to buy them instead of letting just a few people waltz in and buy them all up for themselves.
Because beans aren't in short supply. Goya beans are in short supply. They're making it possible for as many people as possible to get their hands on the product, so a few people don't just come in and buy it all up at once.
As a cracker who likes cheese, I approve of this message.
What if someone launches their nuke?