1
SpaceballsThePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Likely Snopes Fact Checker Requirements:

  1. Ability to write complete sentences in English
  2. Active Democratic voter registration
  3. Lack of conscience enabling one to deceive gullible readers
2
SpaceballsThePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah yes, the old, "We have investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing."

6
SpaceballsThePede 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can attest to that. I tried to boil a 2.5 gal pot of wort on our electric stove top when we lived in an apartment, and it took ages to get it slow rolling. Got fed up and bought a turkey fryer instead. The cost to heat that 700ft² space (all electric) was outrageous too, at about $100-110/month in the winter.

We now heat an 1800ft² home with natural gas, in addition to running all gas appliances (range, dryer, water heater, fireplace), and we've never seen a bill above $90 -- and that includes our provider's $30 monthly service charge.

10
SpaceballsThePede 10 points ago +10 / -0

Democrats were sold snake oil. Their prized news media giants refused to cover Joe's swampy baggage. It'll all start to click when he begins to surround himself with globalists. Last I saw, he was also considering turncoat John Kasich for a cabinet position. Unless Trump prevails, prepare for business as usual with garbage domestic and foreign policy decisions.

2
SpaceballsThePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree. It's not CNN maliciously re-working vote totals, it just happened to have been recorded on CNN's stream. The title could have been worded better, but I was trying to get it uploaded and posted before I ran out the door to work.

The main point to be made was that Hammer and Scorecard are designed to capture data mid-transfer and alter it between destinations. Theoretically, this would show the result in live view barring some other reason. Malicious or not, the American people are owed an explanation as to how a nearly 40k vote swing occurred, and whether or not the event is isolated.

5
SpaceballsThePede 5 points ago +5 / -0

It won't matter unless this particular whistle-blower (and others experiencing similar pressure to commit fraud) are willing to sacrifice their anonymity and testify.

Regardless where you live, if you see corruption, document and report it. The more we can expose the better.

11
SpaceballsThePede 11 points ago +11 / -0

Better start a 3 year investigation and pull all his bank account records for deposits from Smucker's.

52
SpaceballsThePede 52 points ago +52 / -0

Probably infected the USB drive. If I were Tucker, I'd only open it on some cheap burner computer offline without access to other shared drives.

13
SpaceballsThePede 13 points ago +13 / -0

My thoughts exactly. And then the media will thrash Trump for polarizing politics and making it difficult to reach across the aisle.

BTW, when in recent memory, has the left ever gone high?

3
SpaceballsThePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget their "temperament" argument they rode all the way up to the 2016 election.

MUh nUcleAr cOdeS!

3
SpaceballsThePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah, that's just California. Come to the Midwest, the weather has been fantastic for watching 410 sprints.

6
SpaceballsThePede 6 points ago +6 / -0

First thing the DOE should investigate is their admissions policy regarding test scores among different races.

2
SpaceballsThePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Amish have a significant financial stake in this election as well. With many being small businesses owners, they're savvy as to what could happen under a Biden tax plan.

3
SpaceballsThePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

You could buy a new, off-the-shelf Remington 700 or a Ruger Precision Rifle (on sale) for under $1,000. However, you'll still have to pony up for an optic. IMO if you want to stay cost effective, look for deals on Votex glass. They're not the most bombproof scopes out there, but they are certainly capable and come with a lifetime warranty.

8
SpaceballsThePede 8 points ago +8 / -0

Interesting that Orlando Health confirmed their positive rate was 9.4% as opposed to 98%. My original guess was a systematic or mathematical error that moved the decimal, but this clearly debunks that notion. This limits the explanation down to two possibilities: 1) Egregious mathematical error or 2) Falsified data reports to push an agenda.

view more: ‹ Prev