3
SparrowHawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Petition to call her 'Cortez' instead of AOC or some other stupid shit.

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know bro - I've half a mind to look through each and every court case and write down what happened so I can prove it.

9
SparrowHawk 9 points ago +9 / -0

I tried explaining the court thing to a relative, and the answer I got was 'what, ALL of them refused to see evidence? Why?" and I can't answer that without looking like a conspiracy theorist. When the fraud is this ridiculous, some of it becomes unbelievable to normies

2
SparrowHawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did they actually say they can use it now? I researched it just a few days ago and all I could find was sources saying it didn't work

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. From looking briefly, though, a lot of the cases have 'Yes' on Decided on Merit. Are these different types of cases?

Just for my own clarification, lack of standing means that the court decided that the plaintiff did not have the right to file the case?

3
SparrowHawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there a way to show that none have allowed evidence to be shown? I've tried telling normies, but they can't believe that part

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a great one to show normies. I wish we could gather the best evidence in one spot

2
SparrowHawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lin Wood is probably just a nut. I'd like to know where Sidney Powell's lawsuits are going as well.

25
SparrowHawk 25 points ago +25 / -0

I don't think the Democrats cheated - I fucking KNOW they did!

2
SparrowHawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll have a look at these tomorrow, thank you. Any word on Giuliani's cases? What about the 2000 affidavits?

4
SparrowHawk 4 points ago +4 / -0

See that's weird to me. Isn't it worth it finding out if the office of the president has been won through fraud and telling the fucking people about it?

20
SparrowHawk 20 points ago +20 / -0

Real question - what's going on with all the lawsuits? Are they still on?

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

'worse than trump' means that you think trump is bad. Why the fuck are you here?

2
SparrowHawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I still think that Cruz is on our side, and he 'appeared' FURIOUS when interviewing Dorsey. What can a man in his position do?

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

What errors do you mean? maybe I missed something.

The problem with computer-'errors' is that they can usually be explained away by normies - "oh that's a glitch, it happens". "If there's an error, they adjudicate it, no problem". Now we all know that the adjudication process is bullshit, and that mail-in voting is ripe with fraud, but this is something that normie-land hasn't woken up to yet, and probably won't, because they refuse to believe that their own side cheated. Now if we had something like several recordings of the people in charge admitting to cheating, then that would be something else.

The 'hardest' proof I've personally seen is probably the Georgia videotapes, yet even those can be 'explained' away by saying that they were just normal votes, or that it's standard procedure (lies).

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say trust the plan - I said keep your chin up and continue to spread word of the fraud, because it's working

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say that it was - but a fradulent president is waay worse than a fradulent election campaign. If Biden and Harris have to resign due to fraud, then the shockwaves will destroy the Dems

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rot will continue untill the ground is salted underneath the Dems, but a proven false election? They won't be able to stop that. Imo of course.

1
SparrowHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

You've got a friend in me, pede.

3
SparrowHawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let us hope! The Trump-Mech marches on!

2
SparrowHawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I take it you're being sarcastic - I never followed Sessions at all, so no.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›