2
Spermythecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hated these guys since 2003.

5
Spermythecat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Judge wants to put this on the jury. He knows the mob will be after him if he grants acquittal.

39
Spermythecat 39 points ago +39 / -0

You know what’s funny even fucking Marx didn’t want the workers disarmed. Remember the elites never want you to be armed.

2
Spermythecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fucking appeal that order. This is bullshit and put pressure on the appeals court to follow the first amendment.

0
Spermythecat 0 points ago +1 / -1

Legally sanctioned racketeering

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +2 / -1

Isn’t this at its best appeasement and at its worst money laundering to political allies?

3
Spermythecat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck you Gardner. We don’t use criminal law to politically persecute people.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can understand questions that are dealing with ambiguity and other material as such that require debate to not have a correct answer. But for material that is cut and dry like this, it is ridiculous.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

You might be able to get Chauvin for excessive force, but certainly not murder. Fuck off.

3
Spermythecat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can’t trust the government with their history.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

They won’t take any case against Hillary Clinton. Courts, at least the major districts, most appeals if not all and the Supreme Court is compromised by black op agencies.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only way I would vote for that walking shit container is if Jesus told me to vote for that Cuck. Jesus hates cucks so that would never happen. Fuck Romney.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I go when I can. Finding a church is hard.

54
Spermythecat 54 points ago +54 / -0

Remember, they are doing it for political reasons. Also, they hate you.

1
Spermythecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

What kind of jobs? I don’t like gender studies either but I want to ensure anything vague doesn’t make it into law.

view more: Next ›