Sure thing.
Just as soon as you give me that one example.
Since it’s literally 100x less difficult it should be easy for you.
Alex Jones is a total straw man as well.
There are tons of conservative commentators not banned.
And being banned isn’t not even the point here.
The point is people say he siphons people or brings them over.
No one has ever given me a single good example of this.
He’s not there to do that.
He’s there to erect the supposed “centrist” position for people too stupid to realize that conservatism is the actual centrist position in America.
He’s not actually centrist or accessible. He’s just hedging.
Furthermore he severely abuses this forum and wastes our time advertising his stupid channel here way too often.
Look at the premise here. I could name 100 people in media who have done more for Trump than Tim Pool simply off the top of my head.
This thread literally screams inorganic promotion.
Expose who. Tell me.
This is such a straw man.
The problem with him is he’s just being moderate for the money.
I don’t want this selfish dude on “our side” because his only principle is centrism as defined by the Democrats who continually push things left with their friends in the GOP establishment.
His opinions aren’t valuable and his personal value is directly tied to that.
It’s not just unpopular. It’s straight wrong, stupid, propaganda, and insulting.
I never thought it wasn’t real. But any early raid like this was likely an intelligence agency covering its ass.
Not a group of freedom minded Patriots.
I don’t understand why everyone is all worked up about this.
For no one understand they were holding the laptop for this timeframe so that they could use it as political leverage.
FBI sucks. Everyone knows that. This is their game now. They collect dirt in order to protect their own existence.
That’s probably why this China shit is being leaked as well.
Someone wasn’t going to support Wray sticking around so this gets leaked.
You’re not at all wrong but when arguing with libs I love using adjectives because it throws their bullshit back at them.
In a court it’s stupid. Online it reads like poetry when they have to suck down that type of ridiculous nonsense and read the truth at the same time.
Kind of a mistake to put this reply here as it needs more attention but this is a really good spot.
This is literally speaking to Roberts in every way imaginable.
“This is making you political! People will judge you.”
We will see how principled these judges are very soon.
I feel bad for that attorney. Imagine having a name that is one letter different than the presstitutes.
I mean you are wrong.
The Cuban missile crisis was manufactured by the Soviets to get us to negotiate missiles out of Turkey.
The Cold War itself was a reasonable reaction to the threat of war. This was a world which never really knew long periods of peace prior to 1945 AND which had used every means possible to wage war. Including the United States using nuclear bombs in a war situation.
It’s fair to argue if citizens should be afraid. But I think it’s fair to instill fear of mutually assured destruction as a survival mechanism.
Now if you want to argue that people manipulated that fear to achieve their own selfish desires I think that is at least an argument worth having.
Respectfully disagree.
I want the people with the intelligence and understanding of the law here who were smart enough and who had the proper initiative to file this in the first place to argue this.
I don’t want some random guy who decided he wanted in on something good and knows nothing about the issues here to say something stupid and give a guy like Roberts a reason to fuck us over.
Honestly QAnon is a huge straw man in this context and needs to be treated as such.
Nobody in congress has any type of meaningful policy being offered up or changed because of the shit QAnon people spout off about.
Next time Dems bring this up to you call it a straw man and have THEM explain what kind of actual meaningful effect QAnon has had.
Respectfully this is not good.
Anticipate serious GOPE meddling here.
Let Texas argue the case. Fuck this too many cooks in the kitchen nonsense.
If people want to help that’s great but if people want to interfere to introduce poor quality arguments or false evidence that’s not a thing I’m going to support.
Tim Pool is garbage.
WHY THE FLYING FUCK ARE WE JUST HEARING ABOUT THIS NOW.
Fucking Republican dipshits in government can’t even leak info in a reasonable or timely way.
This dude won’t resign. He’s protected now.
I agree with the sentiment.
Though it really has no place here as this is more of a result of lobbying and big government than anything.
Libertarianism has achieved the majority of its social goals. Where are you on limited government?
To me as an American it depends on the context.
Like there’s nothing wrong with having an opinion but if you’re peddling influence regardless of the law than it’s likely immoral if nothing else.
Like the Canadians on reddit who constantly cry about “this affects us all” is really an annoying excuse I have no patience for.
I can easily make the same claim about your election but you would tell me to F off.
Continue uploading.
There’s nothing misleading about facts.
I mean I really don’t like the first comment that much but Flu shot is very different.
Like flu shot covers like 4 strains of the flu that they guess about.
That’s why it’s randomly effective. They have no idea which one is going to spread.
There aren’t really “strains” of COVID though there are versions with very slight genetic differences and the 5% failure rate probably has more to do with how a person reacts to the vaccine itself.
That 5% being if I believe that is occurring, which really I’m not sure about.
To be honest you should reply and let him know this response is bullshit.
It’s clearly written two weeks ago.
This latest lawsuit involves disenfranchisement via the illegal methods other states are using.
The fact that Iowa has the ability to conduct its own fair election has nothing to do with this.
Yeah, going to be hard for example for an employer to mandate your use of a vaccine if it is actually not guaranteed to protect others.
Let’s all be honest and clear.
My own current AND the historical scientific definition of a vaccine is one which does NOT allow you to spread said disease once you are inoculated.
If you can still spread the virus then this shot is not definitionally a vaccine AND I further question it’s ability to prevent the disease at all based on history and common sense.
Pretty sure the idea is that Trump for instance polls at 95% in his own party.
Biden would likely poll even below that.
So the takeaway is that this consists of 100% Democrat votes.
I welcome people to our side.
My problem is he doesn’t actually have a side.
He has a monetized channel which doesn’t reflect real opinions.